Chong Long Hak Kee Construction Trading Co v IEC Global Pte Ltd: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration

In Chong Long Hak Kee Construction Trading Co v IEC Global Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal by the defendant, IEC Global Pte Ltd, against the Assistant Registrar's decision to dismiss their application for a stay of proceedings in favor of arbitration. The plaintiff, Chong Long Hak Kee Construction Trading Co, claimed $399,199.32 for works carried out under a sub-contract. The court dismissed the defendant's appeal, finding that the defendant had taken a step in the proceedings by serving a 48-hour notice regarding its counterclaim, thus affirming its intention to pursue the matter in court rather than through arbitration.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Defendant's appeal dismissed with costs.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal regarding stay of proceedings due to arbitration clause. Court dismissed stay, as defendant's actions affirmed court proceedings.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Chong Long Hak Kee Construction Trading CoPlaintiffCorporationJudgment for PlaintiffWon
IEC Global Pte LtdDefendant, AppellantCorporationAppeal dismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tay Yong KwangJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff claimed $399,199.32 for works carried out under a sub-contract.
  2. The sub-contract contained an arbitration clause.
  3. Defendant entered an appearance in the action.
  4. Defendant indicated intention to file application for stay of proceedings.
  5. Plaintiff served a 48-hour notice on the defendant to file and serve the Defence.
  6. Defendant filed its Defence and Counterclaim.
  7. Defendant gave its own 48-hour notice to the plaintiff in respect of its Counterclaim.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Chong Long Hak Kee Construction Trading Co v IEC Global Pte Ltd, Suit 527/2003, [2003] SGHC 234

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Sub-contract signed
Writ of summons filed
Writ of summons served on defendant
Defendant entered an appearance
Pre-trial conference held
Plaintiff served 48-hour notice on defendant
Defendant filed Defence and Counterclaim
Defendant filed application for stay of proceedings
Assistant Registrar dismissed defendant’s application
Defendant’s solicitors sent letter to plaintiff’s solicitors
Plaintiff filed Defence to Counterclaim
Defendant filed an appeal against the Assistant Registrar’s decision
Appeal dismissed

7. Legal Issues

  1. Stay of Court Proceedings
    • Outcome: The court held that the defendant had taken a step in the proceedings, thus nullifying their right to apply for a stay.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Taking a step in proceedings
      • Nullifying intention to arbitrate

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages
  2. Stay of Proceedings

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Arbitration
  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Yeoh Poh San & Anor v Won Siok WanHigh CourtYes[2002] 4 SLR 91SingaporeCited for the principle that a plaintiff's solicitor should not insist on filing a Defence pending the hearing of an appeal for a stay of proceedings.
Ting Ung Tuang v Lau Tiong Ik Construction Sdn BhdHigh CourtYes[2001] 6 MLJ 318MalaysiaCited to show that a Defence must be filed in every case.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Arbitration ActSingapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Arbitration clause
  • Stay of proceedings
  • Step in proceedings
  • 48-hour notice
  • Defence
  • Counterclaim

15.2 Keywords

  • Arbitration
  • Stay of proceedings
  • Construction
  • Singapore
  • High Court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Arbitration
  • Civil Procedure
  • Construction Dispute