Sadique Marican

Sadique Marican is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and prevention of corruption act. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sadique Marican has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	16% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Total failure of consideration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loans	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Computation of Time	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bribes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Franchises and Franchising	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trade Secrets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sadique Marican has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sadique Marican has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Frontier Law Corporation	4 cases	40% of cases	Mohamed Nizam v Sadique Marican: Recovery of Entrusted Funds in Property Purchase(Jul 2009) Downeredi Works v Holcim: Interpretation of Contractual Terms and Jurisdiction of High Court(Nov 2008) Mohamed Nizam v Sadique Marican: Summary Judgment, Extension of Time, and Waiver of Irregularity(Oct 2008)
Tito Isaac & Co	2 cases	20% of cases	Asia Business Forum v. Long Ai Sin: Employee Duties & Confidentiality(Aug 2003) Chua Siew Moi v Oh Thai Nan: Loan Dispute & Share Investment Claim(May 2003)
Sadique Marican & Z M Amin	2 cases	20% of cases	Leong Wai Kay v Carrefour Singapore: Recovery of Bribes Under Prevention of Corruption Act(Apr 2007) Carrefour Singapore v Leong Wai Kay: Recovery of Bribes under Prevention of Corruption Act(Sep 2006)
Tito Isaac and Co	1 cases	10% of cases	Chong Long Hak Kee Construction Trading Co v IEC Global Pte Ltd: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration(Oct 2003)
Madhavan Parnership	1 cases	10% of cases	Flagship Agencies v BBQ Express: Franchise Agreement Dispute over Opt-Out Clause and Damages(Aug 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sadique Marican's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 2 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	22.5 parties avg	2.5	20%
Lost	42.5 parties avg	2.5	40%
Won	42.8 parties avg	2.8	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sadique Marican's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	2(20%)	20%
Lost	4(40%)	40%
Won	4(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,163,200.00	145,400.008 cases	8

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mohamed Nizam v Sadique Marican: Recovery of Entrusted Funds in Property Purchase 09 Jul 2009 Sadique Marican bin Ibrahim Marican (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	09 Jul 2009	Sadique Marican bin Ibrahim Marican (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; summary judgment against the first and second defendants for $380,600 with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Downeredi Works v Holcim: Interpretation of Contractual Terms and Jurisdiction of High Court 10 Nov 2008 Downeredi Works Pte Ltd (formerly known as Works Infrastructure Pte Ltd) (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Nov 2008	Downeredi Works Pte Ltd (formerly known as Works Infrastructure Pte Ltd) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs of $30,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be agreed or taxed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Mohamed Nizam v Sadique Marican: Summary Judgment, Extension of Time, and Waiver of Irregularity 28 Oct 2008 Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar (Defendant, Appellant)Won	28 Oct 2008	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the court held that the Assistant Registrar's decision to extend time for service was correct (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Citiraya Technology v Centillion Environment: Claim for Refund Due to Failure of Consideration 21 Oct 2008 Citiraya Technology Sdn Bhd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Dismissed	21 Oct 2008	Citiraya Technology Sdn Bhd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for a refund of $2,000,000 was dismissed.
5	Leong Wai Kay v Carrefour Singapore: Recovery of Bribes Under Prevention of Corruption Act 29 Apr 2007 Carrefour Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	29 Apr 2007	Carrefour Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent to recover $292,800, the amount of gratification received by the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Carrefour Singapore v Leong Wai Kay: Recovery of Bribes under Prevention of Corruption Act 05 Sep 2006 Carrefour Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	05 Sep 2006	Carrefour Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and final judgment entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $292,800 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Chong Long Hak Kee Construction Trading Co v IEC Global Pte Ltd: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration 09 Oct 2003 Chong Long Hak Kee Construction Trading Co (Plaintiff)Won	09 Oct 2003	Chong Long Hak Kee Construction Trading Co (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffCosts awarded to the plaintiff fixed at $300 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Asia Business Forum v. Long Ai Sin: Employee Duties & Confidentiality 27 Aug 2003 Asia Business Forum Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	27 Aug 2003	Asia Business Forum Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's action was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Chua Siew Moi v Oh Thai Nan: Loan Dispute & Share Investment Claim 02 May 2003 Oh Thai Nan (Defendant)Lost	02 May 2003	Oh Thai Nan (Defendant): Partial LossDefendant ordered to pay the plaintiff $166,700 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Flagship Agencies v BBQ Express: Franchise Agreement Dispute over Opt-Out Clause and Damages 12 Aug 2001 Flagship Agencies Pte Ltd (formerly known as Adena Trading & Engineering Pte Ltd) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	12 Aug 2001	Flagship Agencies Pte Ltd (formerly known as Adena Trading & Engineering Pte Ltd) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal was dismissed.