MCI Worldcom v Chembell: Breach of Contract and Illegality under Malaysian Law

In Suit 819/2002, MCI Worldcom Asia Pte Ltd, a Singapore-incorporated company, sued Chembell Technology Sdn Bhd, a Malaysian company, in the High Court of Singapore before S Rajendran J, for breach of contract. MCI sought US$136,640.87 for unpaid invoices and US$227,407.13 in damages. Chembell argued the services were illegal under Malaysian law. The court allowed MCI’s claim for unpaid services and damages to be assessed, dismissing Chembell’s counterclaim.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Plaintiffs’ claim allowed with costs. Defendants’ counterclaim dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore court case involving MCI Worldcom and Chembell Technology over unpaid invoices and alleged illegality of services under Malaysian law. Claim allowed.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
MCI Worldcom Asia Pte LtdPlaintiffCorporationClaim allowedWonLim Yee Ming
Chembell Technology Sdn BhdDefendantCorporationCounterclaim dismissedLostZaheer K Merchant, Christina Lee

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
S RajendranJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Lim Yee MingNg Chong Hue LLC
Zaheer K MerchantMadhavan Partnership
Christina LeeMadhavan Partnership

4. Facts

  1. MCI and Chembell entered into a Master Services Agreement on 16 December 1999.
  2. MCI was to provide international communication services to Chembell to and from Malaysia.
  3. Chembell paid invoices up to November 2001 but failed to pay invoices issued thereafter.
  4. MCI terminated its services to Chembell and commenced proceedings to recover unpaid amounts.
  5. Chembell alleged the services were illegal under Malaysian law.
  6. MCI provided services through Vads Sdn Bhd, which claimed to be duly licensed in Malaysia.

5. Formal Citations

  1. MCI Worldcom Asia Pte Ltd v Chembell Technology Sdn Bhd, Suit 819/2002, [2003] SGHC 251

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Master Services Agreement signed
Chembell stopped paying invoices
Chembell realised services provided by MCI was tainted with illegality
Suit filed
Hearing adjourned
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court allowed MCI’s claim for breach of contract.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Illegality of Contract
    • Outcome: The court found that the services provided by MCI were not in contravention of Malaysian law.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Stay of Proceedings
    • Outcome: The court refused the application for a stay of proceedings.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Telecommunications

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Order 14 Rule 12 of the Rules of Court

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Communications and Multimedia Act 1998Malaysia
Telecommunications Act 1950Malaysia

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Master Services Agreement
  • Communications and Multimedia Act 1998
  • Telecommunications Act 1950
  • Value Added Data Network Licence
  • Applications Service Provider Individual Licence
  • Illegality
  • Vads Sdn Bhd

15.2 Keywords

  • breach of contract
  • illegality
  • Malaysian law
  • telecommunications services
  • stay of proceedings

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Telecommunications Law
  • Civil Procedure

17. Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure
  • Contract Law
  • Commercial Transactions
  • Telecommunications Law