Madhavan Partnership

Madhavan Partnership is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2009. The firm has handled 26 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and automobile accidents. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 23.1% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Madhavan Partnership has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	6 cases	10.2% of total caseload	Experienced67.50% relevance score	Madhavan Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10.2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	8.5% of total caseload	Experienced73.21% relevance score	Madhavan Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8.5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	4 cases	6.8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84.00% relevance score	Madhavan Partnership has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6.8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	6.8% of total caseload	Experienced65.00% relevance score	Madhavan Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6.8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	6.8% of total caseload	Experienced61.82% relevance score	Madhavan Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6.8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	6.8% of total caseload	Experienced70.56% relevance score	Madhavan Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6.8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	5.1% of total caseload	General Practice38.75% relevance score	Madhavan Partnership has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	3 cases	5.1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Madhavan Partnership has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.1% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	5.1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79.38% relevance score	Madhavan Partnership has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	3 cases	5.1% of total caseload	Experienced70.83% relevance score	Madhavan Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.1% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Madhavan Partnership has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 7 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Zaheer K Merchant	7 cases	26.9% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 132(Jul 2006) 2006 sghc 68(Apr 2006) 2005 sghc 7(Jan 2005)
Zaheer Merchant	6 cases	23.1% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 93(Jun 2006) 2006 sghc 99(Jun 2006)
Peter Madhavan	5 cases	19.2% of firm's cases	2008 sghc 110(Jul 2008) 2004 sghc 103(May 2004)
Brian Tan	4 cases	15.4% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 131(Jul 2005) 2004 sghc 110(May 2004)
Parveen Kaur Nagpal	4 cases	15.4% of firm's cases	2009 sgca 5(Jan 2009) 2008 sghc 110(Jul 2008)
Sophine Chin	3 cases	11.5% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 93(Jun 2006) 2006 sghc 99(Jun 2006)
Cheva Yu	2 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2003 sghc 286(Nov 2003)
K Jayabalan	2 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 82(Apr 2004) 2003 sghc 134(Jun 2003)
Sivakumar Murugaiyan	2 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2009 sgca 5(Jan 2009) 2007 sghc 172(Nov 2007)
Goh Aik Song	1 cases	3.8% of firm's cases	2006 sghc 132(Jul 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Madhavan Partnership's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 6 (23.1%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	163.8 parties avg	3.8	59.3%
Won	92.7 parties avg	2.7	33.3%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3.7%
Withdrawn	13.0 parties avg	3.0	3.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.8 parties avg	2.8
2003	54.8 parties avg	4.8
2004	62.9 parties avg	2.9
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	52.8 parties avg	2.8
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Madhavan Partnership's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	16(59.3%)	59.3%
Won	9(33.3%)	33.3%
Partial	1(3.7%)	3.7%
Withdrawn	1(3.7%)	3.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	441051.49	12251.4318 cases	18
USD	1310774.76	655387.381 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (4.8%)
2003	041 41	Lost: 4 cases (9.8%) Won: 1 cases (2.4%)
2004	033 33	Lost: 3 cases (9.1%) Won: 3 cases (9.1%)
2005	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2006	032 32	Lost: 3 cases (9.4%) Won: 2 cases (6.3%)
2007	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2008	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2009	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Madhavan Partnership in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Law Society of SingaporeApplicant Won (5)	Applicant	5 cases	Won (5)
Ubin Lagoon Resort Pte LtdRespondent, Defendant, Defendant Won (1)Lost (1)	Respondent, Defendant, Defendant	2 cases	Won (1)Lost (1)
AmBank (M) BhdAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Lee PhengDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Quek Kheng Leong NickyDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Collars Marina Bernardette Das Dores Alias Marina Bernardette Das Dores CollarsPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Collars Muriel Esther de JesusPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
AmBank (M) BerhadApplicant, Respondent Lost (1)	Applicant, Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Lal HiranandAppellant Won (1)	Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
Tiong Sing LeanDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Teng Fuh Holdings Pte LtdPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Boston Asset Management Pte Ltd (formerly known as Universal Network Education Pte Ltd)Defendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tan Hong Liat RonaldDefendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tradelink Hardware Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Chong Ken Ban (alias Chong Johnson)Appellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Masami IwaseAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Male persons in the exclusively male lineClaimant Won (1)	Claimant	1 case	Won (1)
Tan Chee NingDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Motor Insurers’ Bureau of SingaporeDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Da Zhong Investment Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Falcon Piling Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ong Hoo Kim Construction (Pte) LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Chembell Technology Sdn BhdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ganesan KrishnanRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Poh Choon Ann (Pte) LtdDefendant Withdrawn (1)	Defendant	1 case	Withdrawn (1)
Poh Kay LeongDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Fong Weng Sun Peter VincentRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Global Energy (Asia) Pte LtdPlaintiff, Respondent Partial (1)	Plaintiff, Respondent	1 case	Partial (1)