Swee Hong Investment v Collector of Land Revenue: Land Acquisition Compensation & En Bloc Sale Potential

Swee Hong Investment Pte Ltd appealed against the Land Acquisition Appeals Board's award of compensation for the compulsory acquisition of their five strata lots in an industrial building. The Court of Appeal of Singapore, on 12 February 2004, dismissed the appeal, holding that the Board did not err in valuing the lots separately and that the potential for a future en bloc sale should not be considered in determining the compensation payable.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal

1.2 Outcome

Appeal dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal regarding land acquisition compensation. Court held that the potential for future en bloc sale should not be considered when valuing individual strata lots.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Swee Hong Investment Pte LtdAppellantCorporationAppeal dismissedLostJeffrey Beh, Lee Bon Leong
Collector of Land RevenueRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal dismissedWonLeonard Goh

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chao Hick TinJustice of AppealYes
Woo Bih LiJudgeNo
Yong Pung HowChief JusticeNo

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Jeffrey BehLee Bon Leong and Co
Lee Bon LeongLee Bon Leong and Co
Leonard GohAttorney-General's Chambers

4. Facts

  1. Swee Hong Investment Pte Ltd owned five strata lots in Swee Hong Industrial Building.
  2. The land was acquired for the construction of the Circle Line and comprehensive development.
  3. The Collector of Land Revenue initially awarded $9,066,000 to Swee Hong.
  4. Swee Hong claimed that the proper compensation was $25,909,000.
  5. The Land Acquisition Appeals Board awarded Swee Hong $10,785,000.
  6. Swee Hong appealed, arguing that the land should have been valued as a whole.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Swee Hong Investment Pte Ltd v Collector of Land Revenue, CA 7/2003, [2004] SGCA 5

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Notification under s 5 of the Land Acquisition Act published in the Gazette.
Collector of Land Revenue made a total award of $9,066,000 to Swee Hong.
Appeal heard by the Court of Appeal.
Appeal dismissed.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Valuation of Land
    • Outcome: The court held that the Board did not err in valuing the lots separately and that the potential for a future en bloc sale should not be considered.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Consideration of potential en bloc sale
      • Valuation of strata lots

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Increased compensation for land acquisition

9. Cause of Actions

  • Appeal against award of compensation

10. Practice Areas

  • Real Estate Law
  • Land Acquisition
  • Appeals

11. Industries

  • Real Estate
  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Tiessen Trading Pte Ltd v Collector of Land RevenueCourt of AppealYes[2000] 3 SLR 1SingaporeCited regarding the proper method of land valuation and whether it constitutes a question of law or fact.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Land Acquisition Act (Cap 152, 1985 Rev Ed)Singapore
Planning Act (Cap 232, 1998 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Land acquisition
  • Compensation
  • En bloc sale
  • Strata lots
  • Market value
  • Gross plot ratio

15.2 Keywords

  • land acquisition
  • compensation
  • en bloc sale
  • strata title
  • valuation
  • Swee Hong

16. Subjects

  • Land Law
  • Compulsory Acquisition
  • Valuation

17. Areas of Law

  • Land Acquisition Law
  • Valuation Law