Jeffrey Beh

Jeffrey Beh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in damages and wills and probate. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated expertise across 44 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of damage	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sex Crimes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Detinue	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Property	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit Facilities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loss of Profit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Eminent Domain	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Land Acquisition	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jeffrey Beh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jeffrey Beh has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee Bon Leong & Co	7 cases	78% of cases	GHI v Public Prosecutor: Aggravated Outrage of Modesty & Cross-Examination of Vulnerable Witnesses(Aug 2024) PT Master Mandiri v Yamazaki Construction: Mitigation of Loss in Breach of Contract(Nov 2000) PT Master Mandiri v Yamazaki Construction: Breach of Contract & Damages for Heavy Machinery(Oct 2000)
Lee Bon Leong and Co	1 cases	11% of cases	Swee Hong Investment v Collector of Land Revenue: Land Acquisition Compensation & En Bloc Sale Potential(Feb 2004)
Sheila Lopez & Co	1 cases	11% of cases	Societe Generale v Tai Kee Sing: Forum Non Conveniens & Jurisdiction Clause Dispute(Jun 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jeffrey Beh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	44%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	22%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	62.3 parties avg	2.3
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jeffrey Beh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(44%)	44%
Partial	2(22%)	22%
Won	3(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	805,150.00	134,191.676 cases	6
USD	560,000.00	560,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	6 123	Lost: 1 cases (16.7%) Partial: 2 cases (33.3%) Won: 3 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	GHI v Public Prosecutor: Aggravated Outrage of Modesty & Cross-Examination of Vulnerable Witnesses 28 Aug 2024 GHI (Appellant)Lost	28 Aug 2024	GHI (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
2	Swee Hong Investment v Collector of Land Revenue: Land Acquisition Compensation & En Bloc Sale Potential 11 Feb 2004 Swee Hong Investment Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	11 Feb 2004	Swee Hong Investment Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; no monetary amount awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Societe Generale v Tai Kee Sing: Forum Non Conveniens & Jurisdiction Clause Dispute 25 Jun 2003 Tai Kee Sing @ Tai Hean Sing (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	25 Jun 2003	Tai Kee Sing @ Tai Hean Sing (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
4	PT Master Mandiri v Yamazaki Construction: Mitigation of Loss in Breach of Contract 28 Nov 2000 PT Master Mandiri (Appellant)Won	28 Nov 2000	PT Master Mandiri (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; the court set aside the part of the judgment under appeal and reinstated the assistant registrar's order to award a sum of $612,000 to the appellants as damages (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	PT Master Mandiri v Yamazaki Construction: Breach of Contract & Damages for Heavy Machinery 24 Oct 2000 PT Master Mandiri (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Oct 2000	PT Master Mandiri (Plaintiff): Damages AwardedDamages of $183,150 awarded with interest. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	UOB v Sim Marine: Mortgagee's Claim for Vessel Delivery & Damages for Detinue 18 Sep 2000 Sim Marine Services Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	18 Sep 2000	Sim Marine Services Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be paid to the plaintiff in the amount of $560,000 (USD). This amount includes damages for detention at US$400 per day from 1 September 1998 up to the date of judgment (US$300,000), the value of the vessel as of the date of judgment (US$270,000), less the estimated cost of paying the crew to sail the Vessel back to Singapore and other expenses (US$10,000). The currency is assumed to be USD as the damages were calculated in USD.
7	Kamla Lal Hiranand v Harilela Padma Hari: Validity of 1988 Will & Secret Trusts 07 Aug 2000 Others (Respondent)Won	07 Aug 2000	Others (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	PT Master Mandiri v Yamazaki Construction: Damages for Breach of Contract & Mitigation of Loss 05 May 2000 PT Master Mandiri (Plaintiff)Partial	05 May 2000	PT Master Mandiri (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; case remitted to registrar to assess damages for non-delivery of six machines. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Kamla Lal Hiranand v Harilela Padma Hari: Probate Dispute over Validity of Wills and Trust 30 Jan 2000 Harilela Padma Hari (Defendant, Respondent)Won	30 Jan 2000	Harilela Padma Hari (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. The plaintiff was ordered to pay the first and third defendants $10,000 in costs for the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.