Cigar Affair v Pacific Cigar Company: Trade Mark Offences & Search Warrants

Cigar Affair applied to the High Court of Singapore to set aside two search warrants issued against it based on complaints by The Pacific Cigar Company (Singapore) Pte Ltd regarding trade mark infringements. The court dismissed the applications, finding no defect in the complaint and that the seizure of items and documents was within the scope of the warrants. The court held that mens rea is not required for establishing guilt under s 49 of the Trade Marks Act.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Application dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Cigar Affair's application to set aside search warrants for trade mark offences is dismissed. The court found no defect in the complaint.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Cigar AffairApplicantCorporationApplication dismissedLostKirpal Singh
Pacific Cigar CompanyRespondentCorporationWonWonSharmilee Shanmugam

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Woo Bih LiJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Kirpal SinghKirpal and Associates
Sharmilee ShanmugamCitilegal LLC

4. Facts

  1. Cigar Affair is the applicant seeking to set aside search warrants.
  2. The Pacific Cigar Company (Singapore) Pte Ltd is the respondent and exclusive distributor of Cuban cigars.
  3. PCC Singapore received a power of attorney from Corporacion Habanos SA to protect its trade marks.
  4. Private investigators were engaged to investigate the possible sale of counterfeit cigars by Cigar Affair.
  5. Operatives purchased a box of Cohiba cigars with the label “Edicion Limitada 2001” from Cigar Affair.
  6. Mr Callaba concluded that the cigars were counterfeit goods.
  7. A search warrant was issued authorizing the police to enter the Shop and to seize goods and documents.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Cigar Affair v Pacific Cigar Company, Cr M 23/2004, [2005] SGHC 108

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Private investigators visited the Shop.
Search warrant issued and executed.
Return hearing.
No 23 was filed to quash the search warrant.
Judgment issued.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Trade Mark Infringement
    • Outcome: The court found that mens rea is not required for establishing guilt under s 49 of the Trade Marks Act.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Validity of Search Warrant
    • Outcome: The court found no defect in the complaint and that the seizure of items and documents was within the scope of the warrants.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Setting aside of search warrants

9. Cause of Actions

  • Trade Mark Infringement

10. Practice Areas

  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Criminal Law

11. Industries

  • Tobacco

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Heng Lee Handbags Co Pte Ltd v PPHigh CourtYes[1994] 2 SLR 760SingaporeCited regarding the appropriate mode of application to quash a search warrant.
Lance Court Furnishings Pte Ltd v PPHigh CourtYes[1993] 3 SLR 969SingaporeCited regarding the requirement of mens rea in copyright infringement and the scope of search warrants.
SM Summit Holdings Ltd v PPHigh CourtYes[1997] 3 SLR 922SingaporeCited regarding the test for issuing search warrants and the seizure of documents.
Microsoft Corporation v SM Summit Holdings LtdHigh CourtYes[2000] 1 SLR 343SingaporeCited regarding the awarding of costs in quasi-civil criminal motions.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Section 49 Trade Marks Act (Cap 332, 1999 Rev Ed)Singapore
Section 136(1) Copyright Act (Cap 63, 1999 Rev Ed)Singapore
Section 53A Trade Marks Act (Cap 332, 1999 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Trade mark
  • Search warrant
  • Counterfeit cigars
  • Mens rea
  • Infringement
  • Seizure
  • Reasonable cause for suspecting

15.2 Keywords

  • Trade mark infringement
  • Search warrant
  • Counterfeit goods
  • Cigars
  • Cohiba

16. Subjects

  • Trade Marks
  • Criminal Law
  • Intellectual Property

17. Areas of Law

  • Trade Mark Law
  • Criminal Procedure