Sharmilee Shanmugam

Sharmilee Shanmugam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and winding up. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	15% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Search Warrant	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring Services	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sharmilee Shanmugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sharmilee Shanmugam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
CitiLegal LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	Econ Piling v Aviva & JTC: Performance Bond Call After Limitation Period(May 2006) Cigar Affair v Pacific Cigar Company: Trade Mark Offences & Search Warrants(Jun 2005) Wah Yuen Electrical Engineering v Singapore Cables: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Classes(May 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sharmilee Shanmugam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sharmilee Shanmugam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Econ Piling v Aviva & JTC: Performance Bond Call After Limitation Period 07 May 2006 Econ Piling Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	07 May 2006	Econ Piling Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Injunction to restrain payment under performance bond deniedThe plaintiff's application for an injunction to restrain the first defendant from making payment under the performance bond was denied.
2	Cigar Affair v Pacific Cigar Company: Trade Mark Offences & Search Warrants 30 Jun 2005 Pacific Cigar Company (Respondent)Won	30 Jun 2005	Pacific Cigar Company (Respondent): WonApplication to set aside search warrants was dismissed with costs.
3	Wah Yuen Electrical Engineering v Singapore Cables: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Classes 27 May 2003 Singapore Cables Manufacturers Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	27 May 2003	Singapore Cables Manufacturers Pte Ltd (Respondent): Successful OppositionSuccessfully opposed the scheme of arrangement.
4	Wah Yuen Electrical Engineering v Singapore Cables: Scheme of Arrangement Approval Dispute 09 Dec 2002 Singapore Cables Manufacturers Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	09 Dec 2002	Singapore Cables Manufacturers Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedSuccessfully opposed the application for court approval of the revised Scheme of Arrangement.