Tan Siok Yee v Chong Voon Kee Ivan: Determining Liability in Negligence for Motor Accident Injuries
In Tan Siok Yee (suing by the committee of the person and estate, Liew Chee Kong) and Others v Chong Voon Kee Ivan, the High Court of Singapore addressed a negligence claim arising from a motor accident on 28 March 2002, where Tan Siok Yee sustained serious head injuries. The court, presided over by Lai Siu Chiu J, found both the defendant, Chong Voon Kee Ivan, and the first plaintiff, Tan Siok Yee, equally liable for the accident. The court directed the Registrar to assess damages and reserved the costs thereof to the Registrar.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Interlocutory judgment for the plaintiffs with costs based on 50% liability.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment reserved
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
High Court case involving a motor accident where Tan Siok Yee sustained serious injuries. The court found both the defendant motorist and the plaintiff pedestrian equally liable for the accident.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tan Siok Yee | Plaintiff | Individual | Interlocutory judgment | Partial | |
Liew Chee Kong | Plaintiff | Individual | Interlocutory judgment | Partial | |
Liew Hoe Peng | Plaintiff | Individual | Interlocutory judgment | Partial | |
Liew Yian Yee | Plaintiff | Individual | Interlocutory judgment | Partial | |
Liao Hao Yu | Plaintiff | Individual | Interlocutory judgment | Partial | |
Chong Voon Kee Ivan | Defendant | Individual | Interlocutory judgment | Partial |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Lai Siu Chiu | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Muthu Kumaran | Justicius Law Corporation |
Gan Seng Chee | Ang and Partners |
Anna Quah | Ang and Partners |
4. Facts
- The first plaintiff sustained serious head injuries after being hit by the defendant's car.
- The accident occurred on 28 March 2002 at Lorong Telok.
- The defendant was reversing his car when the accident occurred.
- The first plaintiff was on her way to the bank to deposit cash for the coffee shop where she worked.
- The defendant was reversing a long distance to get into a parking bay.
- The court found that the defendant did not see the first plaintiff before the collision.
- The first plaintiff stepped onto the road without looking out for traffic.
5. Formal Citations
- Tan Siok Yee (suing by the committee of the person and estate, Liew Chee Kong) and Others v Chong Voon Kee Ivan, Suit 608/2004, [2005] SGHC 157
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Motor accident occurred resulting in serious head injuries to Tan Siok Yee. | |
Liew Chee Kong was appointed the committee of the person and the estate of the first plaintiff. | |
The defendant paid a composition fine of $500 to compound the offence of failing to drive in an orderly and careful manner. | |
Suit 608/2004 filed. | |
Judgment reserved. |
7. Legal Issues
- Negligence
- Outcome: The court found both the defendant and the first plaintiff equally liable for negligence.
- Category: Substantive
- Contributory Negligence
- Outcome: The court found the first plaintiff contributorily negligent.
- Category: Substantive
- Duty of Care
- Outcome: The court considered the duty of care owed by motorists and pedestrians.
- Category: Substantive
- Res Ipsa Loquitur
- Outcome: The court found the plaintiffs' reliance on the maxim res ipsa loquitur to be misconceived.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Damages for personal injuries
9. Cause of Actions
- Negligence
10. Practice Areas
- Personal Injury
- Motor Vehicle Accidents
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zhang Wan Bo v Poh Kay Leong | High Court | Yes | [2002] SGHC 274 | Singapore | Cited by the plaintiffs' counsel to argue that the defendant should be solely liable for the accident, but the court found the case to be misplaced due to differing facts. |
Tremayne v Hill | N/A | Yes | [1987] RTR 131 | N/A | Cited for the principle that a pedestrian may cross a road at any point, provided they take reasonable care for their own safety. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Negligence
- Contributory negligence
- Duty of care
- Res ipsa loquitur
- Motor accident
- Reversing
- Blind spots
- Pedestrian
- Motorist
15.2 Keywords
- negligence
- motor accident
- pedestrian
- reversing
- contributory negligence
- singapore
- high court
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Negligence | 95 |
Automobile Accidents | 80 |
Personal Injury | 75 |
Evidence | 40 |
Civil Procedure | 30 |
16. Subjects
- Tort Law
- Negligence
- Motor Vehicle Accidents