Justicius Law Corporation

Justicius Law Corporation is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2022. The firm has handled 20 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 8 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and civil practice. Their track record shows a 28.6% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 35% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Justicius Law Corporation has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	6 cases	10.5% of total caseload	General Practice39.23% relevance score	Justicius Law Corporation has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10.5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	6 cases	10.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78.33% relevance score	Justicius Law Corporation has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10.5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	10.5% of total caseload	Experienced66.88% relevance score	Justicius Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10.5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	7.0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Justicius Law Corporation has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7.0% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	7.0% of total caseload	General Practice45.00% relevance score	Justicius Law Corporation has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7.0% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	5.3% of total caseload	General Practice18.75% relevance score	Justicius Law Corporation has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	3 cases	5.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.00% relevance score	Justicius Law Corporation has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5.3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	3.5% of total caseload	General Practice40.00% relevance score	Justicius Law Corporation has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3.5% of total caseload	General Practice25.00% relevance score	Justicius Law Corporation has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.5% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	2 cases	3.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85.00% relevance score	Justicius Law Corporation has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.5% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Justicius Law Corporation has 8 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 9 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Nicholas Lazarus	9 cases	45.0% of firm's cases	2022 sghc 77(Apr 2022) 2020 sghc 165(Aug 2020) 2018 sgca 19(Apr 2018)
Lazarus Nicholas Philip	7 cases	35.0% of firm's cases	2022 sghc 152(Jun 2022) 2022 sghca 18(Apr 2022)
Elizabeth Toh Guek Li	5 cases	25.0% of firm's cases	2022 sghc 152(Jun 2022) 2022 sghca 18(Apr 2022)
Nicholas Philip Lazarus	3 cases	15.0% of firm's cases	2017 sghc 247(Oct 2017) 2017 sgca 23(Mar 2017) 2016 sghc 15(Feb 2016)
Toh Yee Lin Jocelyn	2 cases	10.0% of firm's cases	2018 sghc 61(Mar 2018) 2018 sghc 17(Jan 2018)
Jocelyn Toh	1 cases	5.0% of firm's cases	2018 sgca 19(Apr 2018)
Elizabeth Toh	1 cases	5.0% of firm's cases	2017 sgca 23(Mar 2017)
Muthu Kumaran	1 cases	5.0% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 157(Aug 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Justicius Law Corporation's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 7 (35%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	102.8 parties avg	2.8	47.6%
Won	63.0 parties avg	3.0	28.6%
Partial	45.0 parties avg	5.0	19.0%
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	4.8%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2005	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2007	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2010	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2011	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2016	32.5 parties avg	2.5
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	42.4 parties avg	2.4
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	33.3 parties avg	3.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Justicius Law Corporation's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	10(47.6%)	47.6%
Won	6(28.6%)	28.6%
Partial	4(19.0%)	19.0%
Dismissed	1(4.8%)	4.8%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4309967.11	143665.5715 cases	15
USD	776562.44	388281.221 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Partial: 1 cases (9.1%)
2010	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	03 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2017	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2018	013 13	Lost: 1 cases (7.7%) Won: 3 cases (23.1%)
2020	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	011 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2022	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Won: 1 cases (4.8%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Justicius Law Corporation in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
OGSP ENGINEERING PTE LTDDefendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim, Respondent, Applicant, Respondent Lost (1)Partial (1)Won (2)	Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim, Respondent, Applicant, Respondent	4 cases	Lost (1)Partial (1)Won (2)
Gunaratnam Sakunthar RajRespondent, Defendant Won (1)Dismissed (1)	Respondent, Defendant	2 cases	Won (1)Dismissed (1)
Loganathan RavishankarRespondent, Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim Won (2)	Respondent, Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim	2 cases	Won (2)
Wee Shuo WoonAppellant, Defendant, Defendant, Appellant Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant, Defendant, Appellant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Woon Brothers Investments Pte LtdAppellant, Plaintiff, Appellant Lost (1)Partial (1)	Appellant, Plaintiff, Appellant	2 cases	Lost (1)Partial (1)
MDR LimitedDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
BREAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
BENLEN PTE LTDApplicant Won (1)	Applicant	1 case	Won (1)
Beh Chin JooPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Chong Paik LinPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
BDHDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Venkatraman KalyanaramanPlaintiff, Appellant Lost (1)	Plaintiff, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
BAppellant Partial (1)	Appellant	1 case	Partial (1)
NPAppellant Partial (1)	Appellant	1 case	Partial (1)
Yeo Pia Thian (trading as System Aluminium Works)Defendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Liao Hao YuPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Liew Chee KongPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Liew Hoe PengPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Liew Yian YeePlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Tan Siok YeePlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
SIS Technologies Pte LtdPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)