Law Society v Fun Huay Yew: Advocate Striking Off for Misappropriation of Client Funds

The Law Society of Singapore applied to make absolute an order to show cause against Fun Huay Yew, an advocate and solicitor, for grossly improper and fraudulent conduct. Fun Huay Yew misappropriated $635,000 held as stakeholder for Toshiba Machine S E Asia Pte Ltd and issued a dishonored cheque. The High Court ordered Fun Huay Yew to be struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

The respondent was struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors of the Supreme Court of Singapore.

1.3 Case Type

Regulatory

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Fun Huay Yew, an advocate and solicitor, was struck off the roll for misappropriating client funds and issuing a dishonored cheque.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Law Society of SingaporeApplicantAssociationOrder to show cause made absoluteWonC R Rajah SC, Tan Beng Swee
Fun Huay YewRespondentIndividualStruck off the rollLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Belinda Ang Saw EanJudgeYes
Chao Hick TinJustice of the Court of AppealNo
Yong Pung HowChief JusticeNo

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
C R Rajah SCTan Rajah and Cheah
Tan Beng SweeTan Beng Swee

4. Facts

  1. The respondent was retained as instructing solicitor for Toshiba in a claim against Reliance.
  2. The respondent held $650,000 as stakeholder from the sale of machines.
  3. The Malaysian proceedings were settled, and Toshiba was to be paid $635,000.
  4. The respondent issued a post-dated cheque for $635,000, which was dishonored.
  5. The respondent vacated his office and moved from his last known residential address.
  6. The Disciplinary Committee found the respondent guilty of grossly improper and fraudulent conduct.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Law Society of Singapore v Fun Huay Yew, OS 414/2005, NM 25/2005, [2005] SGHC 96

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Respondent called to the Singapore Bar.
Respondent's letter to Toshiba regarding stakeholder funds.
Respondent's letter to Toshiba regarding stakeholder funds.
Malaysian action settled.
Respondent gave Toshiba a post-dated cheque.
Cheque dishonoured upon presentation for payment.
Toshiba made a police report against the respondent.
Tay Yong Kwang J made an order to show cause against the respondent.
High Court ordered that the respondent be struck off the roll.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Grossly Improper Conduct
    • Outcome: The court found the respondent guilty of grossly improper conduct.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [1972–1974] SLR 132
      • [2001] 3 SLR 616
  2. Fraudulent Conduct
    • Outcome: The court found the respondent guilty of fraudulent conduct.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2001] 1 SLR 721

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Striking off from the roll of advocates and solicitors

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Professional Undertaking
  • Fraud

10. Practice Areas

  • Disciplinary Proceedings

11. Industries

  • Legal Services

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Re Marshall DavidHigh CourtYes[1972–1974] SLR 132SingaporeCited for the definition of 'grossly improper conduct' as conduct dishonourable to the solicitor as a man and in his profession.
Law Society of Singapore v Lim Kiap KheeCourt of AppealYes[2001] 3 SLR 616SingaporeCited for the principle that deliberately breaching an undertaking to pay over moneys held as stakeholder constitutes grossly improper conduct.
Law Society of Singapore v Lim Yee KaiCourt of AppealYes[2001] 1 SLR 721SingaporeCited for the principle that a solicitor who has acted dishonestly will be struck off the roll.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2001 Rev Ed)Singapore
Section 83(2)(b) Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2001 Rev Ed)Singapore
Section 90 of the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2001 Rev Ed)Singapore
Section 98(5) of the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2001 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Stakeholder
  • Grossly improper conduct
  • Fraudulent conduct
  • Dishonoured cheque
  • Professional undertaking
  • Misappropriation

15.2 Keywords

  • Law Society
  • Fun Huay Yew
  • Advocate
  • Solicitor
  • Misappropriation
  • Striking off
  • Singapore

16. Subjects

  • Legal Ethics
  • Professional Responsibility

17. Areas of Law

  • Legal Profession
  • Professional Misconduct
  • Regulatory Law