Tan Rajah and Cheah

Tan Rajah and Cheah is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2012. The firm has handled 24 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and legal malpractice. Their track record shows a 41.7% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 12.5% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Rajah and Cheah has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	6 cases	14.6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76.67% relevance score	Tan Rajah and Cheah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 14.6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	4 cases	9.8% of total caseload	Experienced74.12% relevance score	Tan Rajah and Cheah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9.8% of their total caseload.
Family Law	3 cases	7.3% of total caseload	General Practice48.75% relevance score	Tan Rajah and Cheah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7.3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7.3% of total caseload	Experienced72.00% relevance score	Tan Rajah and Cheah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7.3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	4.9% of total caseload	General Practice15.00% relevance score	Tan Rajah and Cheah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.9% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	2 cases	4.9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85.00% relevance score	Tan Rajah and Cheah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.9% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4.9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Tan Rajah and Cheah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4.9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78.00% relevance score	Tan Rajah and Cheah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.9% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4.9% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Tan Rajah and Cheah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.9% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2.4% of total caseload	Experienced65.00% relevance score	Tan Rajah and Cheah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.4% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Tan Rajah and Cheah has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 4 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
C R Rajah	4 cases	16.7% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 194(Oct 2005) 2005 sghc 120(Jul 2005) 2005 sgca 21(Apr 2005)
Chew Kei-Jin	3 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 220(Nov 2005) 2005 sghc 203(Oct 2005)
Imran H Khwaja	3 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2010 sghc 353(Dec 2010) 2005 sghc 54(Mar 2005)
Chelva Rajah	3 cases	12.5% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 115(May 2004)
C R Rajah SC	2 cases	8.3% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 96(May 2005) 2005 sghc 54(Mar 2005)
Cheryl Lim	2 cases	8.3% of firm's cases	2004 sghc 162(Aug 2004) 2004 sghc 3(Jan 2004)
Rudy Gunaratnam	2 cases	8.3% of firm's cases	2004 sgca 36(Aug 2004) 2004 sghc 67(Mar 2004)
Moiz Sithawalla	1 cases	4.2% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 194(Oct 2005)
Michelle Ong	1 cases	4.2% of firm's cases	2012 sghcr 18(Nov 2012)
Chelva R Rajah	1 cases	4.2% of firm's cases	2005 sghc 231(Dec 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Rajah and Cheah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.4
Complex Cases: 3 (12.5%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	132.8 parties avg	2.8	54.2%
Won	102.8 parties avg	2.8	41.7%
Neutral	120.0 parties avg	20.0	4.2%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	1110.1 parties avg	10.1
2005	113.1 parties avg	3.1
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Rajah and Cheah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	13(54.2%)	54.2%
Won	10(41.7%)	41.7%
Neutral	1(4.2%)	4.2%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	60000	1395.3513 cases	13

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	0614 614	Lost: 6 cases (1.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (0.2%) Won: 4 cases (0.7%)
2005	065 65	Lost: 6 cases (9.2%) Won: 5 cases (7.7%)
2010	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Tan Rajah and Cheah in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Korea Exchange BankAppellant, Defendant, Applicant, Defendant Lost (1)Won (1)	Appellant, Defendant, Applicant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (1)Won (1)
Mohd Arsad bin HassanAppellant, Defendant Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
IPCO International LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ang Hai San HenryPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Tham Kok Leong ThomasRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Iwuchukwu Amara TochiDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ng Chek SengPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Tan Chwee ChyePlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Tan Sin EngPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Cheng-Wong Mei Ling TheresaPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Ong Ying PingRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Law Society of SingaporeApplicant Won (1)	Applicant	1 case	Won (1)
Govitex Enterprises Pte LtdPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Kunal Gobind LalchandaniPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Full Fledge Holdings LtdRespondent, Appellant, Plaintiff Won (1)	Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Multico-Orchids (S) Pte LtdDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Thio Su MienDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Chooket PrasongDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Excel Golf Pte LtdPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Betty Pai alias Pai ShaDefendant Neutral (1)	Defendant	1 case	Neutral (1)
Borneo Jaya Pte LtdDefendant Neutral (1)	Defendant	1 case	Neutral (1)
Burhan Uray (alias Wong Ming Kiong)Defendant Neutral (1)	Defendant	1 case	Neutral (1)
DGS International Finance Company BVDefendant Neutral (1)	Defendant	1 case	Neutral (1)
H. Sudradjat Djajapert JundaDefendant Neutral (1)	Defendant	1 case	Neutral (1)
Handforth Profits LimitedDefendant Neutral (1)	Defendant	1 case	Neutral (1)
Hendrik BurhanDefendant Neutral (1)	Defendant	1 case	Neutral (1)
Joseph SiswantoDefendant Neutral (1)	Defendant	1 case	Neutral (1)
Joseph Wong Kiia TaiDefendant Neutral (1)	Defendant	1 case	Neutral (1)
Natura Holdings Pte LtdDefendant Neutral (1)	Defendant	1 case	Neutral (1)
P.T. Daya Guna Samudera TBKDefendant Neutral (1)	Defendant	1 case	Neutral (1)
Soejono VarinataDefendant Neutral (1)	Defendant	1 case	Neutral (1)
WMP Trading Pte LtdDefendant Neutral (1)	Defendant	1 case	Neutral (1)
Lobo Carlos Manuel RosadoRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Kertar and CoDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Teo Yeow ChuahAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Northern Elevator Manufacturing Sdn BhdAppellant Won (1)	Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
Ezekiel Caleb Charles JamesRespondent Lost (1)	Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Lai Min FeePlaintiff, Respondent Won (1)	Plaintiff, Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
Lai Min TetPlaintiff, Respondent Won (1)	Plaintiff, Respondent	1 case	Won (1)