Parkway Hospitals v Sandar Aung: Contractual Liability for Hospital Expenses Exceeding Initial Estimate

In the High Court of Singapore, Parkway Hospitals Singapore Pte Ltd and Mount Elizabeth Medical Holdings Ltd sued Sandar Aung to recover $537,432.34 for medical services rendered to Aung's mother. Aung signed an agreement to be liable for her mother's hospital expenses. The court, presided over by Judith Prakash J, found Aung liable for $320,083.77, representing hospital charges incurred before the transfer of the hospital's business to Parkway, but not for the doctors' fees.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for the plaintiffs.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Parkway Hospitals sued Sandar Aung for unpaid medical bills of her mother. The court found Aung liable for hospital charges incurred.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Parkway Hospitals Singapore Pte Ltd (trading as Mount Elizabeth Hospital)PlaintiffCorporationJudgment for PlaintiffWonLek Siang Pheng, Mar Seow Hwei
Mount Elizabeth Medical Holdings Ltd (formerly known as Elizabeth Hospital Ltd.)PlaintiffCorporationJudgment for PlaintiffWonLek Siang Pheng, Mar Seow Hwei
Sandar AungDefendantIndividualJudgment against DefendantLostJames Leslie Ponniah, Leong Sue Lynn

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Judith PrakashJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Lek Siang PhengRodyk & Davidson
Mar Seow HweiRodyk & Davidson
James Leslie PonniahWong & Lim
Leong Sue LynnWong & Lim

4. Facts

  1. Mdm Tin Nyunt was admitted to Mount Elizabeth Hospital for an angioplasty.
  2. Sandar Aung signed an agreement to be liable for her mother's hospital expenses.
  3. The initial estimated hospital charges were $15,227.30.
  4. Mdm Tin Nyunt suffered complications and had a lengthy stay in the hospital.
  5. The final hospital bill was $537,432.34.
  6. MEM Holdings assigned its business and assets to Parkway.
  7. Parkway sued Sandar Aung for the unpaid medical bill.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Parkway Hospitals Singapore Pte Ltd (trading as Mount Elizabeth Hospital) and Another v Sandar Aung, Suit 68/2006, [2006] SGHC 200

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Mdm Tin Nyunt admitted to Mount Elizabeth Hospital for angioplasty.
Sandar Aung signed an agreement with Mount Elizabeth Medical Holdings Ltd agreeing to be liable for expenses incurred by Mdm Tin Nyunt.
Hospital business, assets, and liabilities of MEM Holdings transferred to Parkway Hospitals Singapore Pte Ltd.
Mdm Tin Nyunt discharged from the hospital.
Parkway sent Mdm Tin Nyunt an invoice for $537,432.34.
Action commenced against Sandar Aung.
Judgment given in favor of the plaintiffs.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court found the defendant liable for breach of contract.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Enforceability of Assignment
    • Outcome: The court held that the assignment was enforceable after MEM Holdings was added as a plaintiff.
    • Category: Procedural
  3. Construction of Contractual Terms
    • Outcome: The court construed the agreement to mean that the defendant was liable for all hospital charges incurred, not just the estimated amount.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Healthcare

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Lexi Holdings plc v Garth Scott StainforthEnglish Court of AppealYes[2006] EWCA Civ 988England and WalesCited for the application of the contra proferentem rule.
Tam Wing Chuen v Bank of Credit and Commerce Hong Kong LtdN/AYes[1996] 2 BCLC 69Hong KongCited for the basis of the contra proferentem principle.
Pacific Century Regional Developments Ltd v Estate of Seow Khoon SengCourt of AppealYes[1997] 3 SLR 761SingaporeCited for the objective approach to construing a contract.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Assignment
  • Contractual Liability
  • Hospital Expenses
  • Medical Services
  • Estimate
  • Financial Obligation
  • Undertaking

15.2 Keywords

  • contract
  • hospital
  • medical
  • expenses
  • liability
  • assignment

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Healthcare
  • Debt Recovery

17. Areas of Law

  • Contract Law
  • Assignment