Lek Siang Pheng

Lek Siang Pheng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 33 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in medical malpractice and medical negligence. Their track record shows a 61.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 30% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated expertise across 108 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and medical malpractice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	17 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 17 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	13 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	11 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	11 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	10 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	8 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Informed consent	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patient Confidentiality	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tort	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Diagnosis	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Standard of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hospital Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pathology	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Diagnosis	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Surgical procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offshore Trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wealth Protection	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Concealment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Spinal Surgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Obstetrics and Gynaecology	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anaesthesiology	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Doctor's Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Altered Consent Form	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Policies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful life claim	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Urology	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accidental Drowning	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cost Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Infertility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Charitable Giving	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Failure to Diagnose	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hospital Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual discretions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Charitable trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offers to Settle	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claim	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Policy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lek Siang Pheng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lek Siang Pheng has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	14 cases	42% of cases	Kuntjoro Wibawa v Harianty Wibawa: Breach of Trust, Offshore Trusts, and Inheritance Dispute(May 2016) AXF v Koh Cheng Huat: Negligence Claim for Death During Childbirth & Limitation Defence(Apr 2016) AMZ v AXX: Breach of Contract, Repudiatory Breach, and Damages in Oil Supply Agreement Arbitration(Oct 2015)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	6 cases	18% of cases	Glenville v Quek Swee Chong: Validity of Writ of Summons Served After Expiry on Non-Working Day(Oct 2021) Goh Guan Sin v Yeo Tseng Tsai: Medical Negligence, Post-Surgery Care, Brain Tumour, Persistent Vegetative State(Nov 2019) Singapore Medical Council v BXR: Appeal Against Costs Order in Medical Disciplinary Proceedings(Sep 2019)
Helen Yeo & Partners	6 cases	18% of cases	Yap Chwee Khim v American Home Assurance: Insurance Claim Dispute over Accidental Drowning(Apr 2001) Harte v Tan: Negligence, Medical Malpractice & Costs in Fertility Treatment(Jan 2001) Harte v Tan: Medical Negligence, Varicocelectomy, and Testicular Atrophy(Nov 2000)
Dentons Rodyk & Davison LLP	2 cases	6% of cases	Noor Azlin v Changi General Hospital: Negligence Claim & Costs Allocation(Jun 2018) Noor Azlin v Changi General Hospital: Negligence in Lung Cancer Diagnosis(Feb 2018)
Rodyk & Davidson	2 cases	6% of cases	Sandar Aung v Parkway Hospitals: Contractual Terms & Hospital Bill Dispute(Mar 2007) Parkway Hospitals v Sandar Aung: Contractual Liability for Hospital Expenses Exceeding Initial Estimate(Nov 2006)
Rodyk and Davidson	2 cases	6% of cases	JU v See Tho Kai Yin: Negligence & Breach of Contract in Down Syndrome Birth(Aug 2005) Teo Chee Yeow v Tan Harry: Determining Benefit of Co-Appellant's Successful Appeal on Damages(Jul 2004)
Shen Meijun	1 cases	3% of cases	DFS v NUHS Fund Ltd: Lapse of Charitable Gift to Dissolved NUH Endowment Fund(Nov 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lek Siang Pheng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 10 (30%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	23.0 parties avg	3.0	6%
Lost	83.3 parties avg	3.3	24%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	3%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Won	204.1 parties avg	4.1	61%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	45.0 parties avg	5.0
2001	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	53.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	27.5 parties avg	7.5
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	34.7 parties avg	4.7
2019	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lek Siang Pheng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	2(6%)	6%
Lost	8(24%)	24%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	2(6%)	6%
Won	20(61%)	61%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,912,840.02	170,123.4823 cases	23

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	4 13	Dismissed: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2001	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	5 14	Neutral: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2019	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 33 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DFS v NUHS Fund Ltd: Lapse of Charitable Gift to Dissolved NUH Endowment Fund 27 Nov 2023 NUHS Fund Limited (Defendant)Won	27 Nov 2023	NUHS Fund Limited (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; costs of $30,000 plus reasonable disbursements awarded to the Defendant, to be paid out from the Estate (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Glenville v Quek Swee Chong: Validity of Writ of Summons Served After Expiry on Non-Working Day 25 Oct 2021 ASC Clinic for Women Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	25 Oct 2021	ASC Clinic for Women Pte Ltd (Defendant): Summons allowedSummons allowed and ordered to pay costs to the plaintiff of $5,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Goh Guan Sin v Yeo Tseng Tsai: Medical Negligence, Post-Surgery Care, Brain Tumour, Persistent Vegetative State 26 Nov 2019 Yeo Tseng Tsai (Defendant)Won	26 Nov 2019	Yeo Tseng Tsai (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed.
4	Singapore Medical Council v BXR: Appeal Against Costs Order in Medical Disciplinary Proceedings 03 Sep 2019 BXR (Respondent)Won	03 Sep 2019	BXR (Respondent): Costs Order UpheldThe Disciplinary Tribunal's decision to order costs against the SMC was upheld, and the respondent was awarded $20,000 in costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Noor Azlin v Changi General Hospital: Negligence, Breach of Duty, and Delayed Lung Cancer Diagnosis 25 Feb 2019 Soh Wei Wen, Jason (Respondent, Defendant)Won	25 Feb 2019	Soh Wei Wen, Jason (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed against Soh Wei Wen Jason.
6	Noor Azlin v Changi General Hospital: Negligence Claim & Costs Allocation 20 Jun 2018 Soh Wei Wen, Jason (Defendant)Won	20 Jun 2018	Soh Wei Wen, Jason (Defendant): Costs awardedLegal costs of $320,000.00, 5% uplift for Offer to Settle of $16,000.00, GST of $23,520.00 and Disbursements of $68,123.31. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Armstrong v Quest Laboratories: Negligence, Causation, and Damages in Medical Tort 20 Mar 2018 Quest Laboratories Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	20 Mar 2018	Quest Laboratories Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against the DefendantThe defendant was ordered to pay $1,241,334 in damages to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Noor Azlin v Changi General Hospital: Negligence in Lung Cancer Diagnosis 13 Feb 2018 Soh Wei Wen, Jason (Defendant)Won	13 Feb 2018	Soh Wei Wen, Jason (Defendant): Action dismissedPlaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed.
9	Lam Kwok Tai Leslie v. Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Suspension for Failure to Obtain Informed Consent 19 Oct 2017 Lam Kwok Tai Leslie (Appellant)Won	19 Oct 2017	Lam Kwok Tai Leslie (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against conviction for professional misconduct allowed; sentence and costs orders set aside.
10	Kuntjoro Wibawa v Harianty Wibawa: Breach of Trust, Offshore Trusts, and Inheritance Dispute 31 May 2016 Harianty Wibawa (Defendant)Won	31 May 2016	Harianty Wibawa (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the first defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	AXF v Koh Cheng Huat: Negligence Claim for Death During Childbirth & Limitation Defence 05 Apr 2016 DR KOH CHENG HUAT (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	05 Apr 2016	DR KOH CHENG HUAT (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs against the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	AMZ v AXX: Breach of Contract, Repudiatory Breach, and Damages in Oil Supply Agreement Arbitration 29 Oct 2015 AXX (Defendant, Respondent)Won	29 Oct 2015	AXX (Defendant, Respondent): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the tribunal's award was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	AXF v Koh Cheng Huat: Dependency Claims, Time-Bar under Civil Law Act 13 Sep 2015 Koh Cheng Huat (Defendant, Respondent)Won	13 Sep 2015	Koh Cheng Huat (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $7,500 (excluding disbursements) to be paid by the plaintiffs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Chua Thong Jiang Andrew v Yue Wai Mun: Joinder of Parties & Vicarious Liability in Medical Negligence 28 Jun 2015 Yue Wai Mun (Defendant)Neutral	28 Jun 2015	Yue Wai Mun (Defendant): Reasons for suing both defendants deemed insufficientThe court found the plaintiff's reasons for suing both Dr. Yue and SGHPL to be insufficient.
15	Chua Thong Jiang Andrew v Yue Wai Mun: Negligence in Spine Surgery 03 May 2015 Yue Wai Mun (Defendant)Won	03 May 2015	Yue Wai Mun (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against the first defendant, Dr. Yue, was dismissed.
16	Ang Pek San Lawrence v Singapore Medical Council: Disciplinary Proceedings & Costs 04 Mar 2015 Ang Pek San Lawrence (Appellant)Won	04 Mar 2015	Ang Pek San Lawrence (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; conviction and all orders made by the Disciplinary Committee, including the costs order, were set aside. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	Ang Pek San Lawrence v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct & Standard of Care in VBAC Delivery 18 Nov 2014 Ang Pek San Lawrence (Appellant)Won	18 Nov 2014	Ang Pek San Lawrence (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against conviction for professional misconduct allowed; orders made by the Disciplinary Committee set aside. Appellant to have costs and disbursements of the inquiry and proceedings (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Lee Kim Kwong v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct in Caesarean Section 29 Jul 2014 Lee Kim Kwong (Appellant)Partial	29 Jul 2014	Lee Kim Kwong (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in partAppeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part, reducing the period of suspension from nine to five months. Financial penalty of $10,000 remains (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Li Siu Lun v Looi Kok Poh: Gleneagles Hospital Conspiracy & Damages Assessment 13 Nov 2013 Gleneagles Hospital (Defendant)Lost	13 Nov 2013	Gleneagles Hospital (Defendant): Interlocutory judgment entered against defendantInterlocutory judgment entered against Gleneagles; compensatory damages of $10,000 and aggravated damages of $240,000 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Tong Seok May Joanne v Yau Hok Man Gordon: Medical Negligence, Anaesthesia, Informed Consent, Neck Injury 18 Dec 2012 Yau Hok Man Gordon (Defendant)Won	18 Dec 2012	Yau Hok Man Gordon (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs.
21	Ho Wah Nam v Tan Kim Siang Luke: Assessment of Damages for Cardiac Arrest During Stapedectomy 06 Nov 2012 Third defendant (Defendant)Lost	06 Nov 2012	Third defendant (Defendant): Damages AssessedDamages assessed against the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Hwa Lai Heng Ricky v DBS Bank: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Damages 21 Feb 2010 DBS Bank Ltd (Respondent)Partial	21 Feb 2010	DBS Bank Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for Respondent to the extent of 30% of its claimJudgment be given for the Respondent to the extent of 30 per cent of its claim against the Appellant, and that the Appellant be granted leave to defend the remaining 70 per cent of the same.
23	Zhong Da Chemical v Lanco Industries: Security for Costs in Setting Aside Arbitration Award 06 May 2009 Zhong Da Chemical Development Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	06 May 2009	Zhong Da Chemical Development Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Security for costs orderedPlaintiff ordered to provide security for the defendant’s costs in the amount of S$75,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
24	Sandar Aung v Parkway Hospitals: Contractual Terms & Hospital Bill Dispute 29 Mar 2007 Mount Elizabeth Medical Holdings Ltd (formerly known as Mount Elizabeth Hospital Ltd) (Respondent)Lost	29 Mar 2007	Mount Elizabeth Medical Holdings Ltd (formerly known as Mount Elizabeth Hospital Ltd) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the judgment in favor of the respondent was allowed.
25	Parkway Hospitals v Sandar Aung: Contractual Liability for Hospital Expenses Exceeding Initial Estimate 06 Nov 2006 Mount Elizabeth Medical Holdings Ltd (formerly known as Elizabeth Hospital Ltd.) (Plaintiff)Won	06 Nov 2006	Mount Elizabeth Medical Holdings Ltd (formerly known as Elizabeth Hospital Ltd.) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $320,083.77 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26	JU v See Tho Kai Yin: Negligence & Breach of Contract in Down Syndrome Birth 07 Aug 2005 See Tho Kai Yin (Defendant)Won	07 Aug 2005	See Tho Kai Yin (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant.
27	Teo Chee Yeow v Tan Harry: Determining Benefit of Co-Appellant's Successful Appeal on Damages 13 Jul 2004 Gleneagles Hospital Ltd (Appellant)Lost	13 Jul 2004	Gleneagles Hospital Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe second appellant's appeal was dismissed, and they did not receive the benefit of the first appellant's successful appeal.
28	Yap Chwee Khim v American Home Assurance: Insurance Claim Dispute over Accidental Drowning 08 Apr 2001 American Home Assurance Co (Respondent)Won	08 Apr 2001	American Home Assurance Co (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment in favour of the respondent. The court dismissed the appeal with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
29	Harte v Tan: Negligence, Medical Malpractice & Costs in Fertility Treatment 30 Jan 2001 Gleneagles Hospital Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	30 Jan 2001	Gleneagles Hospital Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against Gleneagles Hospital Ltd dismissed.
30	Harte v Tan: Medical Negligence, Varicocelectomy, and Testicular Atrophy 23 Nov 2000 Gleneagles Hospital Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	23 Nov 2000	Gleneagles Hospital Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against Gleneagles Hospital Ltd dismissed.
31	Yap Chwee Khim v American Home Assurance: Insurance Claim Dispute over Accidental Drowning 07 Sep 2000 Winterthur Insurance (Far East) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	07 Sep 2000	Winterthur Insurance (Far East) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the Defendant; Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
32	Silver Stream v Ong: Partnership Dissolution & Account Dispute 23 Jul 2000 Silver Stream Air-Conditional Restaurant (In Receivership) (Plaintiff)Won	23 Jul 2000	Silver Stream Air-Conditional Restaurant (In Receivership) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the sum of $339,200, plus interest from the date of writ and costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
33	Winpac Paper Products Pte Ltd v. Directors: Derivative Action & Director's Duties under Companies Act 07 Mar 2000 Third defendant (Defendant)Won	07 Mar 2000	Third defendant (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against the third defendant was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.