Law Society v Tay Eng Kwee Edwin: Solicitor Struck Off for Failing to Maintain Accounts

The Law Society of Singapore applied to show cause why Tay Eng Kwee Edwin should not be punished for professional transgression. Tay Eng Kwee Edwin, a solicitor, failed to maintain any books or accounts for one year, breaching the Legal Profession (Solicitors’ Accounts) Rules. The High Court of Singapore ordered that Tay Eng Kwee Edwin be struck off the roll of solicitors.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Respondent struck off the roll of solicitors.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Law Society's application to punish solicitor for failing to maintain accounts. The court ordered the solicitor be struck off the roll.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Law Society of SingaporeApplicantStatutory BoardJudgment for ApplicantWon
Tay Eng Kwee EdwinRespondentIndividualStruck off the roll of solicitorsLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chan Sek KeongChief JusticeNo
Andrew Phang Boon LeongJustice of the Court of AppealNo
V K RajahJustice of the Court of AppealYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The respondent failed to maintain any books or accounts for one year.
  2. The respondent was declared a bankrupt.
  3. The Law Society received information about the respondent's bankruptcy proceedings.
  4. The respondent admitted to not maintaining the required books of accounts.
  5. The respondent officially ceased practice.
  6. The respondent was unrepresented at the disciplinary committee proceedings and show cause hearing.
  7. The respondent secured employment in China with the Official Assignee’s permission.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Law Society of Singapore v Tay Eng Kwee Edwin, OS 64/2007, [2007] SGHC 114

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Respondent admitted as an advocate and solicitor of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Singapore.
Respondent set up his own legal practice, M/s Edwin Tay & Co.
Respondent declared a bankrupt.
Law Society received information that bankruptcy proceedings were pending against the respondent.
Ms Prabha Dube and Ms Yashodhara Dhoraisingam met the respondent.
Council intervened into the client account of M/s Edwin Tay & Co.
Respondent officially ceased practice.
An inquiry committee was appointed to look into the matter.
Disciplinary committee hearing.
Law Society obtained an order allowing it to effect service on the respondent.
Respondent struck off the roll of solicitors.
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Legal Profession (Solicitors’ Accounts) Rules
    • Outcome: The court found that the respondent had breached the Legal Profession (Solicitors’ Accounts) Rules by failing to maintain proper books and accounts.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to keep proper accounts
      • Failure to maintain cash books
      • Failure to maintain ledgers
      • Failure to reconcile client accounts
  2. Appropriate Penalty for Professional Misconduct
    • Outcome: The court determined that the appropriate penalty was to strike the respondent off the roll of solicitors, considering the severity and deliberate nature of the misconduct.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Striking off the roll of solicitors
  2. Censure
  3. Suspension from practice

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Legal Profession Act
  • Breach of Legal Profession (Solicitors’ Accounts) Rules

10. Practice Areas

  • Disciplinary Proceedings

11. Industries

  • Legal Services

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Law Society of Singapore v Chiong Chin May SelenaHigh CourtYes[2005] 4 SLR 320SingaporeCited for the principle that failure to comply with the Solicitors' Accounts Rules will attract serious consequences and that a breach of the SA Rules has to be treated extremely seriously.
Law Society of Singapore v Tan Sok LingHigh CourtYes[2007] SGHC 37SingaporeCited to reiterate how critical it is that all solicitors strictly comply with and uphold the Solicitors' Accounts Rules.
Law Society of Singapore v Ravindra SamuelHigh CourtYes[1999] 1 SLR 696SingaporeCited for the principle that even if no apparent dishonesty is involved, a solicitor may be struck off the roll if the lapse indicates a lack of requisite qualities of character and trustworthiness.
Bolton v Law SocietyCourt of AppealYes[1994] 1 WLR 512England and WalesCited for the principle that lawyers should discharge their professional duties with integrity, probity and complete trustworthiness.
In re A SolicitorMalaya High CourtYes(1962) 3 MC 323MalaysiaCited for the principle that the legal profession owes the public a duty involving an extremely high standard of probity and a way of conducting business, particularly in relation to financial matters, which is beyond suspicion.
Ex parte Attorney-General for the CommonwealthFederal CourtYes(1972) 20 FLR 234AustraliaCited for the test to be applied by the court in deciding whether to strike off a solicitor, namely, whether the legal practitioner is a fit and proper person to remain a member of the profession.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Legal Profession (Disciplinary Committee Proceedings) Rules (Cap 161, R 2, 2003 Rev Ed)

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2001 Rev Ed)Singapore
Section 83(2)(b) Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2001 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Solicitors’ Accounts Rules
  • Professional misconduct
  • Breach of duty
  • Books of accounts
  • Disciplinary proceedings
  • Striking off
  • Bankruptcy
  • Integrity
  • Probity
  • Trustworthiness

15.2 Keywords

  • Law Society
  • Solicitor
  • Accounts
  • Legal Profession
  • Singapore
  • Disciplinary
  • Struck Off

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Legal Ethics
  • Accounting
  • Professional Responsibility