Peter Low Partnership

Peter Low Partnership is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2007. The firm has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 4 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and cannabis law. Their track record shows a 37.5% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 28.6% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Peter Low Partnership has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and appellate practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	2 cases	9.1% of total caseload	Experienced54.00% relevance score	Peter Low Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9.1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	9.1% of total caseload	General Practice28.00% relevance score	Peter Low Partnership has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9.1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	4.5% of total caseload	General Practice5.00% relevance score	Peter Low Partnership has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	Peter Low Partnership has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.5% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	4.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Peter Low Partnership has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.5% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	4.5% of total caseload	General Practice20.00% relevance score	Peter Low Partnership has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.5% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	4.5% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	Peter Low Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.5% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4.5% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Peter Low Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4.5% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Peter Low Partnership has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.5% of their total caseload.
Defamation Law	1 cases	4.5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95.00% relevance score	Peter Low Partnership has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.5% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Peter Low Partnership has 4 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 4 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Peter Cuthbert Low	4 cases	57.1% of firm's cases	2007 sghc 178(Oct 2007)
Philip Ling	1 cases	14.3% of firm's cases	2007 sghc 126(Aug 2007)
Bhargavan Sujatha	1 cases	14.3% of firm's cases	2007 sghc 114(Jul 2007)
Peter Low	1 cases	14.3% of firm's cases	2007 sghc 192(Nov 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Peter Low Partnership's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 2 (28.6%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	45.0 parties avg	5.0	50.0%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	37.5%
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	12.5%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	74.1 parties avg	4.1

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Peter Low Partnership's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	3(37.5%)	37.5%
Dismissed	1(12.5%)	12.5%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	0143 143	Dismissed: 1 cases (0.7%) Lost: 4 cases (2.8%) Won: 3 cases (2.1%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Peter Low Partnership in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Hugo RestallDefendant, Defendant, Appellant Lost (2)	Defendant, Defendant, Appellant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Engineering Computer Services (S) Pte LtdDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Tan Siew Meng AaronDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Millar Gavin James QCApplicant Lost (1)	Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)
Review Publishing Company LimitedDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Narindar Singh KangApplicant Dismissed (1)	Applicant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
B-Gold Interior Design & Construction Pte LtdAppellant Won (1)	Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
Law Society of SingaporeApplicant Won (1)	Applicant	1 case	Won (1)
Gavin James MillarApplicant Lost (1)	Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)
Review Publishing Co LtdDefendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)