SeaCAD Technologies v Tan Siew Meng Aaron: Misappropriation of Confidential Info & Breach of Non-Competition Clause

SeaCAD Technologies Pte Ltd sued its former employee, Tan Siew Meng Aaron, and his current employer, Engineering Computer Services (S) Pte Ltd, in the High Court of Singapore, alleging misappropriation of confidential information and breach of a non-competition clause. The court, presided over by Justice Kan Ting Chiu, dismissed the claim for misappropriation of confidential information due to lack of evidence. However, the court found that Tan Siew Meng Aaron breached the non-competition clause in his employment contract by joining a competitor within one year of leaving SeaCAD Technologies. The court ordered damages to be assessed by the Registrar and costs to be paid by the first defendant.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for Plaintiff in part; claim for breach of non-competition clause allowed; claim for misappropriation of confidential information dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment reserved

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

SeaCAD Technologies sued Tan Siew Meng Aaron for misappropriating confidential information and breaching a non-competition clause. The court dismissed the claim for misappropriation but found a breach of the non-competition clause.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
SeaCAD Technologies Pte LtdPlaintiffCorporationJudgment for Plaintiff in partPartialGodwin Campos
Tan Siew Meng AaronDefendantIndividualClaim Dismissed, Breach of non-competition clauseLost, LostPeter Low
Engineering Computer Services (S) Pte LtdDefendantCorporationClaim DismissedWonPeter Low

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Kan Ting ChiuJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Godwin CamposGodwin Campos & Co
Peter LowPeter Low Partnership

4. Facts

  1. SeaCAD Technologies deals in computer hardware, software, and accessories.
  2. Tan Siew Meng Aaron was employed by SeaCAD Technologies as an account manager.
  3. Tan Siew Meng Aaron's employment contract contained a non-competition clause.
  4. Tan Siew Meng Aaron resigned from SeaCAD Technologies and joined Engineering Computer Services (S) Pte Ltd.
  5. Engineering Computer Services (S) Pte Ltd is a competitor of SeaCAD Technologies.
  6. SeaCAD Technologies alleged that Tan Siew Meng Aaron misappropriated confidential information before resigning.
  7. SeaCAD Technologies claimed Tan Siew Meng Aaron breached the non-competition clause.

5. Formal Citations

  1. SeaCAD Technologies Pte Ltd v Tan Siew Meng Aaron and Another, Suit 250/2006, [2007] SGHC 192

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Letter of appointment issued to Tan Siew Meng Aaron
Tan Siew Meng Aaron tendered resignation
Tan Siew Meng Aaron retracted resignation
Tan Siew Meng Aaron tendered another letter of resignation
Tan Siew Meng Aaron joined Engineering Computer Services (S) Pte Ltd
Suit filed by SeaCAD Technologies Pte Ltd
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Misappropriation of Confidential Information
    • Outcome: The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove that the first defendant had downloaded or made copies of the plaintiff's confidential information.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Breach of Non-Competition Clause
    • Outcome: The court found that the first defendant breached the non-competition clause by joining a competitor within one year of leaving the plaintiff.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Restraint of Trade
    • Outcome: The court found the restraint in respect of Malaysia unjustified and invalid and is to be severed from the non-competition clause.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Damages
  2. Injunction

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Misappropriation of Confidential Information

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Technology

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Buckman Laboratories (Asia) Pte Ltd v Lee Wei HoongHigh CourtYes[1999] 3 SLR 333SingaporeCited for the principle that a restraint of trade clause must protect legitimate interests and be reasonable.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Non-Competition Clause
  • Confidential Information
  • Misappropriation
  • Restraint of Trade
  • Employment Contract

15.2 Keywords

  • Non-competition
  • confidential information
  • misappropriation
  • employment
  • contract
  • restraint of trade

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Employment Law
  • Tort Law
  • Confidentiality
  • Competition Law

17. Areas of Law

  • Contract Law
  • Tort
  • Restraint of Trade
  • Employment Law