Clark Jonathan Michael v Lee Khee Chung: Assessment of Damages for Motor Vehicle Accident

In Clark Jonathan Michael v Lee Khee Chung, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal regarding the assessment of damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff, Clark Jonathan Michael, in a motor vehicle accident caused by the defendant, Lee Khee Chung. The plaintiff claimed damages for pain and suffering, medical expenses, loss of income, and loss of earning capacity. The court partially allowed the plaintiff's appeal, increasing the award by $2,055.78 for contingent costs.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal allowed in part.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Assessment of damages for a motor vehicle accident resulting in whiplash injury. The court partially allowed the plaintiff's appeal, increasing the award by $2,055.78.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Clark Jonathan MichaelPlaintiff, AppellantIndividualAppeal allowed in partPartial
Lee Khee ChungDefendant, RespondentIndividualAppeal dismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Judith PrakashJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiff was injured in a collision between his motor vehicle and the defendant’s motor vehicle on 7 October 2002.
  2. The plaintiff suffered a whiplash injury as a result of the accident.
  3. The plaintiff experienced persistent pain and stiffness of the neck, headaches, and tinnitus.
  4. The plaintiff sought osteopathic and ayurvedic treatment.
  5. The plaintiff deferred his nursing studies due to his injuries.
  6. The plaintiff claimed for loss of income and loss of earning capacity.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Clark Jonathan Michael v Lee Khee Chung, Suit 698/2005, RA 306/2008, 311/2008, [2009] SGHC 204

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Motor vehicle collision occurred.
Interlocutory judgment against the defendant.
Judgment reserved.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Assessment of Damages
    • Outcome: The court partially allowed the plaintiff's appeal, increasing the award by $2,055.78 for contingent costs.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Pain and suffering
      • Loss of amenities
      • Medical expenses
      • Loss of income
      • Loss of earning capacity
  2. Causation
    • Outcome: The court found that the plaintiff's neck pain, headaches, and tinnitus were caused or triggered by the accident.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Whether the plaintiff's injuries were caused by the accident
  3. Reasonableness of Medical Treatment
    • Outcome: The court found that the plaintiff's adoption of osteopathic and ayurvedic treatment was not reasonable.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Whether it was reasonable for the plaintiff to seek osteopathic and ayurvedic treatment

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Damages for pain and suffering
  2. Medical expenses
  3. Loss of income
  4. Loss of earning capacity

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence

10. Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents
  • Assessment of Damages

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Ngiam Kong Seng v Lim Chiew HockCourt of AppealYes[2008] 3 SLR 674SingaporeCited regarding the appellate court's role in disturbing findings of fact.
PP v Mohammed Liton Mohammed Syeed MallikCourt of AppealYes[2008] 1 SLR 601SingaporeCited regarding the appellate court's role in assessing witness veracity.
Peh Eng Leng v Pek Eng LeongCourt of AppealYes[1996] 2 SLR 305SingaporeCited regarding the appellate judge's position in fact-finding.
Tan Siew Bin Ronnie v Chin Wee KeongHigh CourtYes[2008] 1 SLR 178SingaporeCited as a useful reference case with similar facts regarding whiplash injury.
Nirumalan V Kanapathi Pillay v Teo Eng ChuanHigh CourtYes[2003] 3 SLR 601SingaporeCited for reference to precedents in deciding on the proper quantum of damages.
Chew Poh Kwan Margaret v Toh Hong GuanHigh CourtYes[2004] SGHC 280SingaporeCited as another case of whiplash injuries leading to chronic tension-type headaches and depression.
Mei Yue Lan Margaret v Raffles City (Pte) LtdHigh CourtYes[2005] 4 SLR 740SingaporeCited as a case with injuries of a very different nature from those sustained by the plaintiff.
De Cruz Andrea Heidi v Guangzhou Yuzhhitang Health Products Co LtdHigh CourtYes[2003] 4 SLR 682SingaporeCited as a case with injuries of a very different nature from those sustained by the plaintiff.
Seah Yit Chen v Singapore Bus Service (1978) LtdHigh CourtYes[1990] SLR 530SingaporeCited for the test of whether it was reasonable for the plaintiff to seek traditional treatment.
Kuan Kian Seng v Wong Choon KehHigh CourtYes[1995] SGHC 43SingaporeCited regarding the recoverability of costs of traditional medicine.
Lim Yuen Li Eugene v Singapore Shuttle Bus Service Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2005] SGHC 189SingaporeCited regarding loss of income.
Hwang Soo Chiat v Salleh Bin Mustan SinthaDistrict CourtYes[2004] SGDC 165SingaporeCited regarding loss of earning capacity.
Karuppiah Nirmala v Singapore Bus Services LtdHigh CourtYes[2002] 3 SLR 415SingaporeCited regarding loss of earning capacity.
Koh Soon Pheng v Tan Kah EngHigh CourtYes[2003] 2 SLR 538SingaporeCited regarding loss of earning capacity.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Whiplash injury
  • Pain and suffering
  • Loss of amenities
  • Medical expenses
  • Loss of income
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Osteopathic treatment
  • Ayurvedic treatment
  • Contingent costs

15.2 Keywords

  • Motor vehicle accident
  • Whiplash
  • Damages
  • Personal injury
  • Singapore
  • High Court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Personal Injury
  • Motor Vehicle Accident
  • Damages Assessment