Ramesh Appoo

Ramesh Appoo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 31 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in work injury compensation and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 16% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated expertise across 97 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	15 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	14 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	10 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	10 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	9 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Whiplash Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination of Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accident Reconstruction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traffic Incident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficiaries	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offer and Acceptance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Earning Capacity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Expenses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Motorcycle Accident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fibromyalgia	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Intervention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Motorcycle Accident Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Volenti non fit injuria	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Amenities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Exaggerated Injuries	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Distribution Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bias	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Supply of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Management Corporation Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Piracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgagee's power of sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Injure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quasi-Bailment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debtor and Creditor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ramesh Appoo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ramesh Appoo has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 25 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Just Law LLC	25 cases	81% of cases	Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd v Biswas Dipu: Work Injury Compensation - Principal's Liability(Oct 2019) Temasek Polytechnic v Poh Peng Ghee: Work Injury Compensation Appeal(Sep 2018) Hauque Enamul v China Taiping: Work Injury Compensation for Construction Worker's Back Injury(May 2018)
Anand T & Co	3 cases	10% of cases	Panatron v Lee: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Tort of Deceit in Share Subscription(Jul 2001) Panatron v Lee Cheow Lee: Conspiracy, Breach of Contract, and Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Coating Business(Oct 2000) Nuplex Industries v Panatron: Chemical Resins Supply Dispute(Oct 2000)
Brij Rai & RA Anthony	2 cases	6% of cases	Soeparto Nilam v Sit Ley Timber: Caveat Removal Dispute under Land Titles Act(Dec 2002) Healthy Living Marketing v Jeanrich Marketing: Breach of Contract & Termination of Sole Agency for Bionaire Fans(Oct 2002)
Netto & Netto	1 cases	3% of cases	Goh Chin Soon v Vickers Capital: Mortgagee's Duty of Care & Bankruptcy(Dec 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ramesh Appoo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 5 (16%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	152.8 parties avg	2.8	48%
Neutral	22.5 parties avg	2.5	6%
Partial	53.0 parties avg	3.0	16%
Won	93.2 parties avg	3.2	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2001	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2006	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2009	32.8 parties avg	2.8
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ramesh Appoo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	15(48%)	48%
Neutral	2(6%)	6%
Partial	5(16%)	16%
Won	9(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	797,964.40	36,271.1122 cases	22

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2006	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2009	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 31 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bintai Kindenko Pte Ltd v Biswas Dipu: Work Injury Compensation - Principal's Liability 13 Oct 2019 Bintai Kindenko Private Limited (Applicant)Lost	13 Oct 2019	Bintai Kindenko Private Limited (Applicant): Application dismissedThe application by Bintai Kindenko Private Limited was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Temasek Polytechnic v Poh Peng Ghee: Work Injury Compensation Appeal 27 Sep 2018 NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Ltd (Applicant)Won	27 Sep 2018	NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Ltd (Applicant): Appeal AllowedThe Amended Certificate of Order of Assistant Commissioner of Labour was set aside.
3	Hauque Enamul v China Taiping: Work Injury Compensation for Construction Worker's Back Injury 14 May 2018 Kim Technology & Systems Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	14 May 2018	Kim Technology & Systems Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. Required to pay compensation of $11,850.08 to the applicant.
4	Seow Hwa Chuan v Ong Wah Chuan: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injuries from Motor Vehicle Accidents 25 Jul 2016 Ong Wah Chuan (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	25 Jul 2016	Ong Wah Chuan (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe defendant's appeal was allowed in part, resulting in a reduction of the damages awarded to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Mykytowych v VIP Hotel: Damages Assessment for Slip and Fall Injury 13 Jul 2016 V I P Hotel (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	13 Jul 2016	V I P Hotel (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, resulting in increased damages payable to the Appellant.
6	Selvaganthan v Cheung: Road Accident, Negligence, and Spinal Injuries 29 Sep 2015 CHEUNG MAN WAI (Defendant)Lost	29 Sep 2015	CHEUNG MAN WAI (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant for damages in the sums of $7,000 as general damages and $4,950 as special damages. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Wang Jianbin v Hong De Development: Personal Injury Claim for Workplace Accident 24 Sep 2015 Hong De Development Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	24 Sep 2015	Hong De Development Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Partial LossThe defendant was found liable for 80% of the damages awarded to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Teo Gim Tiong v Krishnasamy Pushpavathi: Enforceability of Settlement Agreement After Plaintiff's Death 23 Jul 2014 Krishnasamy Pushpavathi (legal representative of the estate of Maran s/o Kannakasabai, deceased) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	23 Jul 2014	Krishnasamy Pushpavathi (legal representative of the estate of Maran s/o Kannakasabai, deceased) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court held that the victim's mother had no capacity to accept the offer.
9	Tan Boon Heng v Lau Pang Cheng David: Principles Governing Review of Registrar's Decision on Damages Assessment 03 Sep 2013 Tan Boon Heng (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	03 Sep 2013	Tan Boon Heng (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $12,000 to the respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Rashid Osman v Abdul Muhaimin: Negligence, Motorcycle Accident, and Illegality Defense 26 Feb 2013 NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Ltd (Co-Defendant)Neutral	26 Feb 2013	NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Ltd (Co-Defendant): Appeal to Court of AppealThe Co-Defendant has filed an appeal to the Court of Appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Zhu Shan Fu v China Construction Builders: Assessment of Damages for Workplace Injury 14 Mar 2012 China Construction Builders Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	14 Mar 2012	China Construction Builders Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed against the defendant.
12	Ong Wah Chuan v Seow Hwa Chuan: Leave to Appeal & Supreme Court of Judicature Act Interpretation 25 Apr 2011 Ong Wah Chuan (Applicant)Neutral	25 Apr 2011	Ong Wah Chuan (Applicant): NeutralThe applicant sought a declaration that leave is not required to appeal against the learned DJ’s decision on liability or alternatively, that leave be granted to the defendant pursuant to section 21(1) SCJA to file an appeal against the DJ’s decision on liability.
13	Selvam Raju v Camelron General Contractors: Workmen's Compensation Claim Dispute 02 Mar 2010 Another (Respondent)Won	02 Mar 2010	Another (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the respondent was dismissed.
14	Mohit Singh v Sim Han Khoon: Negligence and Liability in Car Accident 03 Dec 2009 Mohit Singh (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	03 Dec 2009	Mohit Singh (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal awarded against the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Clark Jonathan Michael v Lee Khee Chung: Assessment of Damages for Motor Vehicle Accident 14 Sep 2009 Lee Khee Chung (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	14 Sep 2009	Lee Khee Chung (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedDefendant's appeal against the AR's decision was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Lu Bang Song v Teambuild Construction: Employee Injury Claim Dismissed 02 Mar 2009 Grandbuild Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Won	02 Mar 2009	Grandbuild Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Cross-Appeal AllowedCross-appeal allowed; no negligence proven on the part of the employer. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Kanuvunaidu v Goh Chan How: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury 19 Jul 2006 Goh Chan How (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	19 Jul 2006	Goh Chan How (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partDefendant's appeal in relation to the awards for pain and suffering succeeds. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Vaswani v Vaswani: Dispute over Insurance Policy Beneficiaries Before Marriage 14 Feb 2006 Vaswani Roshni Anilkumar (Appellant)Lost	14 Feb 2006	Vaswani Roshni Anilkumar (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
19	Si-Hoe Kok Chun v Ramesh Ramchandani: Strata Title Dispute over Management Corporation Affairs 23 Jan 2006 Ramesh Ramchandani (Respondent)Won	23 Jan 2006	Ramesh Ramchandani (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to be taxed unless agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Bayswater Carriers v QBE Insurance: Marine Insurance, Piracy & Violent Theft Claim 28 Sep 2005 Bayswater Carriers Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	28 Sep 2005	Bayswater Carriers Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $730,000 with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the Writ of Summons and costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Vaswani v. Vaswani: Insurance Policy Beneficiaries & Estate Claims 28 Jun 2005 Vaswani Roshni Anilkumar (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	28 Jun 2005	Vaswani Roshni Anilkumar (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed against the Defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
22	Skading Anne v Yeo Kian Seng: Transfer of Action from Magistrate's Court to District Court for Personal Injury Claim 07 Mar 2005 Yeo Kian Seng (Defendant, Respondent)Won	07 Mar 2005	Yeo Kian Seng (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe defendant's appeal against the decision to transfer the proceedings to the District Court was allowed.
23	Zubaida Binte Hussain v Tan Sze Joo: Personal Injury Claim for Road Accident 14 Sep 2004 Tan Sze Joo (Defendant)Partial	14 Sep 2004	Tan Sze Joo (Defendant): Partial LossDefendant found liable for a portion of the Plaintiff's claim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	Pan United Shipping v Cendrawasih Shipping: Liability for Lost Cargo & Demise Charter 22 Feb 2004 Cendrawasih Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	22 Feb 2004	Cendrawasih Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the Defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
25	Mohammed Aziz v Pertubohan Kebangsaan Melayu Singapura: Breach of Natural Justice in Expulsion from Political Party 25 Nov 2003 Mohamed Rahizan Bin Yaacob (Plaintiff)Won	25 Nov 2003	Mohamed Rahizan Bin Yaacob (Plaintiff): Declaration GrantedDeclaration that the decision of the PKMS Supreme Council to expel the plaintiff on 9 June 2003 is null and void.
26	Soeparto Nilam v Sit Ley Timber: Caveat Removal Dispute under Land Titles Act 12 Dec 2002 Soeparto Nilam (Plaintiff)Lost	12 Dec 2002	Soeparto Nilam (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application to remove the caveat was not allowed; the originating summons will be heard together with Suit 798 of 2002.
27	Healthy Living Marketing v Jeanrich Marketing: Breach of Contract & Termination of Sole Agency for Bionaire Fans 13 Oct 2002 Healthy Living Marketing Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	13 Oct 2002	Healthy Living Marketing Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the Defendant is ordered to render an account of profits made from the sale of fans after the termination date, to pay nominal damages of $1 for breach of the non-competition clause, and to pay the Plaintiff's costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	Panatron v Lee: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Tort of Deceit in Share Subscription 03 Jul 2001 Phua Mong Seng (Appellant)Lost	03 Jul 2001	Phua Mong Seng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
29	Goh Chin Soon v Vickers Capital: Mortgagee's Duty of Care & Bankruptcy 29 Dec 2000 Goh Teck Beng (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	29 Dec 2000	Goh Teck Beng (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
30	Panatron v Lee Cheow Lee: Conspiracy, Breach of Contract, and Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Coating Business 10 Oct 2000 Panatron Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Oct 2000	Panatron Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claims dismissedPanatron's claims against the defendants are dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
31	Nuplex Industries v Panatron: Chemical Resins Supply Dispute 10 Oct 2000 Panatron Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	10 Oct 2000	Panatron Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaims DismissedDefendant's counterclaims are dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).