Societe Generale v Anwar Agus: Mistake in Mortgage Agreement & Personal Guarantee

In Societe Generale Bank & Trust, Singapore Branch v Anwar Agus and Others, the High Court of Singapore heard a claim by Societe Generale Bank & Trust, Singapore Branch ('the Plaintiff') against Anwar Agus's sons, Patrick Adrian Anwar and Andrew Francis Anwar ('the Defendants'), regarding mortgage agreements and deeds of assignment. The Plaintiff sought to enforce payment from the Defendants based on covenants in the mortgages and deeds of assignment, where the Defendants agreed to pay sums owed by their father, Anwar Agus, to the Plaintiff. The Defendants raised a defense of mistake, claiming they did not intend to be personally liable for their father's debts. The High Court allowed the appeal and granted final judgment in favor of the Plaintiff, finding the defense of mistake unmeritorious.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Allowed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Societe Generale sues Anwar Agus's sons for defaulting on mortgage agreements. The court found no mistake in the agreements and ruled in favor of the bank.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Societe Generale Bank & Trust, Singapore BranchPlaintiffCorporationJudgment for PlaintiffWonNair Suresh Sukumaran, Murali Rajaram
Anwar AgusDefendantIndividualJudgment in DefaultLostEddee Ng, Emmeline Lim
Patrick Adrian AnwarDefendant, AppellantIndividualAppeal LostLostEddee Ng, Emmeline Lim
Andrew Francis AnwarDefendant, AppellantIndividualAppeal LostLostEddee Ng, Emmeline Lim
Scotts Skyline Trust Pte LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment in DefaultLost
Scotts Island Trust Pte LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment in DefaultLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Steven ChongJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Nair Suresh SukumaranAllen & Gledhill LLP
Murali RajaramAllen & Gledhill LLP
Eddee NgTan Kok Quan Partnership
Emmeline LimTan Kok Quan Partnership

4. Facts

  1. Societe Generale Bank & Trust extended credit facilities to Anwar Agus.
  2. Anwar Agus defaulted on payments, leading to termination of credit facilities.
  3. The bank agreed to forbear from legal proceedings under a Forbearance Agreement.
  4. The Forbearance Agreement required mortgages from Anwar Agus's sons.
  5. The mortgages included provisions for the sons to pay all sums due from their father.
  6. Anwar Agus's sons signed the Forbearance Agreement and executed mortgages.
  7. Anwar Agus defaulted on his obligations under the Forbearance Agreement.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Societe Generale Bank & Trust, Singapore Branch v Anwar Agus and Others, Suit 365/2009, RA 316/2009, [2009] SGHC 271

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Investment account opened
Credit facilities extended
Credit facilities terminated
Forbearance Agreement dated
Letter of demand sent
Judgment in default entered against first, fourth and fifth defendants
Sum due from the defendants was $17,232,552.56
Unconditional leave to defend given to second and third defendants
Appeal allowed and final judgment granted in favour of the bank

7. Legal Issues

  1. Mistake
    • Outcome: The court found that the defence of mistake was not borne out by the objective evidence or the defendants' affidavits.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Unilateral Mistake
      • Common Mistake
      • Mutual Mistake
    • Related Cases:
      • [2005] 1 SLR 502
  2. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court found that the defendants were liable for breach of contract under the terms of the mortgages and deeds of assignment.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages
  2. Enforcement of Guarantee

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract
  • Enforcement of Mortgage

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Banking Litigation

11. Industries

  • Banking
  • Finance

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Chwee Chin Keong v Digilandmall.com Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[2005] 1 SLR 502SingaporeCited for the principle that for a defence of unilateral mistake to succeed, it is incumbent on the party alleging mistake to show that the other party had actual or 'Nelsonian' knowledge of their mistake.
L’Estrange v F. Graucob, LimitedKing's BenchYes[1934] 2 KB 394England and WalesCited for the general principle that a party is bound by the terms of a contract which he signs and cannot avoid the contractual obligations by claiming that he did not read or understand it.
Royal Bank of Scotland plc v EtridgeHouse of LordsYes[2001] 3 WLR 1021England and WalesCited regarding the issue of undue influence and the requirements for establishing a presumption of undue influence in cases involving special relationships.
Motor Oil Hellas (Corinth) Refineries SA v Shipping Corporation of India (The Kanchenjunga)N/AYes[1990] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 391N/ACited for the elements required for a defence of promissory estoppel to succeed, including the need for an unequivocal representation that a party would not enforce its legal rights.
Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group LtdEnglish Court of AppealYes[2006] 2 Lloyd’s Report 511England and WalesCited regarding the principle that a party is bound by the documents they sign, even if there was a prior misrepresentation, if the terms of the documents clearly contradict the misrepresentation and the party had the opportunity to read and understand them.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Mortgage
  • Forbearance Agreement
  • Personal Guarantee
  • Credit Facilities
  • Mistake
  • Deeds of Assignment
  • Unilateral Mistake
  • Mutual Mistake
  • Common Mistake

15.2 Keywords

  • Mortgage
  • Mistake
  • Guarantee
  • Contract
  • Singapore
  • Bank
  • Societe Generale

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Banking Law
  • Mortgages
  • Civil Procedure

17. Areas of Law

  • Contract Law
  • Mistake
  • Mortgages
  • Banking Law