Murali Rajaram

Murali Rajaram is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal revision and mistake. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Murali Rajaram has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Money Laundering	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Locus Standi	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Seizure of Property	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corruption	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Challenge against arbitrator	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duties of Legal Profession	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Murali Rajaram has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Murali Rajaram has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Straits Law Practice LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Prometheus Marine v. King: Challenge to Arbitrator & Setting Aside Award for Yacht Defects(Oct 2017) Mustafa Ahunbay v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Revision for Seized Accounts(Sep 2013)
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Societe Generale v Anwar Agus: Mistake in Mortgage Agreement & Personal Guarantee(Nov 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Murali Rajaram's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Murali Rajaram's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	15,013,718.99	7,506,859.502 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Prometheus Marine v. King: Challenge to Arbitrator & Setting Aside Award for Yacht Defects 23 Oct 2017 Ann Rita King (Respondent)Won	23 Oct 2017	Ann Rita King (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $55,000 plus disbursements of $1141.40 awarded to the Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Mustafa Ahunbay v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Revision for Seized Accounts 26 Sep 2013 Mustafa Ahunbay (Applicant)Lost	26 Sep 2013	Mustafa Ahunbay (Applicant): Application for criminal revision dismissedThe applicant's application for criminal revision to set aside the order made by DJ Sarah Tan was dismissed.
3	Societe Generale v Anwar Agus: Mistake in Mortgage Agreement & Personal Guarantee 25 Nov 2009 Societe Generale Bank & Trust, Singapore Branch (Plaintiff)Won	25 Nov 2009	Societe Generale Bank & Trust, Singapore Branch (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffFinal judgment in the sum of $14,958,718.99 together with contractual interest pursuant to cl. 9 of the Facility Terms and Conditions on the principal sum from 2 April 2009 to the date of full payment and costs on an indemnity basis for the appeal, the hearing below and the action. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.