Nirmal Singh v Law Society: Reinstatement to Roll After Corruption Conviction

Nirmal Singh s/o Fauja Singh applied to the High Court of Singapore for reinstatement to the roll of advocates and solicitors, having been struck off in 1995 due to corruption convictions. The court, comprising Chao Hick Tin JA, Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA, and V K Rajah JA, allowed the application on 12 November 2010, finding that Singh had demonstrated sufficient rehabilitation and that his reinstatement would not harm public confidence in the legal profession. The Law Society of Singapore did not object to the application, provided certain conditions were imposed on Singh's practice.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Application Allowed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Nirmal Singh seeks reinstatement to the Singapore Roll of Advocates after being struck off for corruption. The court allowed the application, finding sufficient rehabilitation.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Nirmal Singh s/o Fauja SinghApplicantIndividualApplication AllowedWonDavinder Singh, Pardeep Singh Khosa, Nabil Mustafiz
The Law Society of SingaporeRespondentAssociationNeutralNeutralN Sreenivasan

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chao Hick TinJustice of the Court of AppealYes
Andrew Phang Boon LeongJustice of the Court of AppealNo
V K RajahJustice of the Court of AppealNo

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Davinder SinghDrew & Napier LLC
Pardeep Singh KhosaDrew & Napier LLC
Nabil MustafizDrew & Napier LLC
N SreenivasanStraits Law Practice LLC
Ching SannAttorney-General's Chambers

4. Facts

  1. The applicant was struck off the Roll in 1995 after being convicted of corruption and criminal breach of trust.
  2. The applicant was convicted of offering a bribe to a police officer and misappropriating funds from his firm.
  3. The applicant served 18 months' imprisonment and paid a fine of $5,000.
  4. The applicant disclosed his past convictions to subsequent employers.
  5. The applicant was entrusted with financial responsibilities by his employers after being struck off.
  6. The applicant volunteered with religious organizations and the Sikh Welfare Council.
  7. The Law Society did not object to the application, provided certain conditions were imposed.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Nirmal Singh s/o Fauja Singh v The Law Society of Singapore, Originating Summons No 472 of 2010, [2010] SGHC 336

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Applicant joined the Singapore Police Force
Applicant obtained law degree from the University of London
Applicant left the Singapore Police Force
Applicant admitted as an advocate and solicitor
Applicant became a partner at Gurdaib, Cheong & Narmal
Applicant convicted of corruption and criminal breach of trust
Applicant released from prison
Applicant struck off the Roll
Applicant employed at Sin Seng Huat International Group of Companies
Applicant commenced Master of Laws at University of London
Applicant obtained Master of Laws from the University of London
Applicant left Sin Seng Huat International Group of Companies
Applicant employed at Midwest Group of Companies
Applicant left Midwest Group of Companies
Applicant employed at Wei Yang Cosmetics International Pte Ltd & Antibac Laboratories Pte Ltd
Application for reinstatement allowed

7. Legal Issues

  1. Reinstatement to the Roll of Advocates and Solicitors
    • Outcome: The court exercised its discretion to allow the applicant's reinstatement, subject to certain conditions.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Rehabilitation of a Disbarred Lawyer
    • Outcome: The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient rehabilitation through his conduct and employment history since being struck off the Roll.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Reinstatement to the Roll of Advocates and Solicitors

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Legal Ethics

11. Industries

  • Legal

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Re Nirmal Singh s/o Fauja SinghHigh CourtYes[2001] 2 SLR(R) 494SingaporeDiscusses the previous application for reinstatement by the applicant and the reasons for its dismissal.
Re Chan Chow WangUnknownYes[1983-1984] SLR(R) 55SingaporeCited for the principles germane to an application for reinstatement to the Roll.
Re Lim Cheng PengUnknownYes[1987] SLR(R) 582SingaporeCited for the principles germane to an application for reinstatement to the Roll.
Re Ram KishanUnknownYes[1992] 1 SLR(R) 260SingaporeCited for the principles germane to an application for reinstatement to the Roll.
Knight Glenn Jeyasingam v Law Society of SingaporeUnknownYes[2007] 3 SLR(R) 704SingaporeCited for the principles germane to an application for reinstatement to the Roll.
Narindar Singh Kang v Law Society of SingaporeUnknownYes[2007] 4 SLR(R) 641SingaporeCited for the principles germane to an application for reinstatement to the Roll.
Gnaguru s/o Thamboo Mylvaganam v Law Society of SingaporeUnknownYes[2008] 3 SLR(R) 1SingaporeCited for the principles germane to an application for reinstatement to the Roll.
Kalpanath Singh s/o Ram Raj Singh v Law Society of SingaporeUnknownYes[2009] 4 SLR(R) 1018SingaporeCited for the principles germane to an application for reinstatement to the Roll.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2001 Rev Ed)Singapore
Prevention of Corruption Act (Cap 241, 1993 Rev Ed)Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 1985 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Reinstatement
  • Roll of Advocates and Solicitors
  • Corruption
  • Criminal Breach of Trust
  • Rehabilitation
  • Professional Misconduct
  • Public Interest

15.2 Keywords

  • reinstatement
  • law society
  • corruption
  • singapore
  • legal profession
  • advocate
  • solicitor

16. Subjects

  • Legal Profession
  • Ethics
  • Criminal Law

17. Areas of Law

  • Legal Profession
  • Reinstatement to Roll
  • Professional Misconduct