Chai Cher Watt v SDL Technologies: Refund of Deposits & Damages for Breach of Drilling & Lathe Machine Contracts
Chai Cher Watt, trading as Chuang Aik Engineering Works, sued SDL Technologies Pte Ltd in the High Court of Singapore on 29 November 2010, seeking a refund of deposits and damages for breach of two contracts for the supply of a drilling machine and a lathe machine. Chai Cher Watt claimed that SDL Technologies breached the contracts by delivering a non-new drilling machine, delivering the lathe machine late, and failing to arrange for inspection of the lathe machine. The court dismissed Chai Cher Watt's claim and ordered costs to SDL Technologies.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment reserved.
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Chai Cher Watt sues SDL Technologies for refund of deposits and damages due to alleged breaches of contracts for drilling and lathe machines. The court dismissed the claim.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chai Cher Watt (trading as Chuang Aik Engineering Works) | Plaintiff | Individual | Claim Dismissed | Lost | |
SDL Technologies Pte Ltd | Defendant | Corporation | Judgment for Defendant | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Philip Pillai | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant for the supply of a drilling machine.
- Plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant for the supply of a lathe machine.
- The drilling machine was delivered to the plaintiff but rejected.
- Plaintiff claimed the drilling machine was not new but refurbished.
- Plaintiff claimed the drilling machine was not the correct length.
- Plaintiff claimed the drilling machine had the wrong model number.
- Plaintiff claimed the lathe machine was delivered late.
- Plaintiff claimed the defendant failed to arrange for inspection of the lathe machine.
5. Formal Citations
- Chai Cher Watt (trading as Chuang Aik Engineering Works) v SDL Technologies Pte Ltd, Suit No 439 of 2009, [2010] SGHC 348
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Drill Contract signed | |
Lathe Contract signed | |
Drilling Machine delivered to plaintiff | |
Lathe machine arrived in Singapore | |
Judgment reserved |
7. Legal Issues
- Breach of Contract
- Outcome: The court found that the defendant did not breach the contract in a way that entitled the plaintiff to repudiate it.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Late delivery
- Failure to provide inspection
- Delivery of non-conforming goods
- Repudiation of Contract
- Outcome: The court held that the plaintiff was not entitled to repudiate either the Drill Contract or the Lathe Contract.
- Category: Substantive
8. Remedies Sought
- Refund of deposits
- Monetary Damages
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
11. Industries
- Engineering
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chuan Hiap Seng (1979) Pte Ltd v Progress Manufacturing Pte Ltd | High Court | Yes | [1995] 1 SLR(R) 122 | Singapore | Cited to support the proposition that contracts containing specifications are contracts of sale by description within the meaning of s 13 of the Sale of Goods Act. |
Arcos Ltd v E A Ronaasen & Son | House of Lords | Yes | [1933] AC 470 | United Kingdom | Cited for the principle that minor discrepancies between delivered goods and their description may entitle the purchaser to reject the goods. |
Andrew Bros Ltd v Singer & Co Ltd | King's Bench Division | Yes | [1934] 1 KB 17 | United Kingdom | Cited as an example where the delivery of a second-hand model did not satisfy a contract for a new car. |
Varley v Whipp | Queen's Bench Division | Yes | [1900] 1 QB 513 | United Kingdom | Cited as an example where a very old machine did not perform a contract for a one-year-old second-hand reaping machine. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Sale of Goods Act (Cap 393, 1999 Rev Ed) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Drilling Machine
- Lathe Machine
- Drill Contract
- Lathe Contract
- Repudiatory Breach
- Sale of Goods Act
- Refurbished
- Model Number
- Delivery Time
- Warranty
15.2 Keywords
- contract
- sale of goods
- drilling machine
- lathe machine
- breach of contract
- refund
- damages
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Contract Law | 90 |
Sale of Goods | 80 |
Damages | 50 |
Drilling Machine | 30 |
Lathe Machine | 30 |
16. Subjects
- Contract Dispute
- Sale of Goods