K Ravi Law Corporation
K Ravi Law Corporation is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2025. The firm has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 8 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and construction law. They have managed 1 complex cases, representing 11.1% of their total caseload.
Areas of Practice and Expertise
K Ravi Law Corporation has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and construction law.
| Practice Area | Case Volume |
|---|---|
| Criminal Law | 5 cases |
| Construction Law | 1 cases |
| Commercial Law | 1 cases |
| Litigation | 1 cases |
| Personal Injury | 1 cases |
| Work Injury Compensation | 1 cases |
| Insurance | 1 cases |
Legal Team and Representation
K Ravi Law Corporation has 8 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 2 cases.
| Counsel Name | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Ram Goswami | 2 cases |
| Shabira Banu d/o Abdul Kalam Azad | 2 cases |
| Jeeva Arul Joethy | 1 cases |
| Tan Siew Gek Suzanne | 1 cases |
| K Ravintheran | 1 cases |
| Shanmugam Suppiah | 1 cases |
| K Ravi | 1 cases |
| Gopal Perumal | 1 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of K Ravi Law Corporation's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.4
- Complex Cases
- 1 (11.1%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 82.4 parties avg |
| Partial | 12.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2009 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2010 | 42.2 parties avg |
| 2017 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2021 | 14.0 parties avg |
| 2022 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2025 | 13.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of K Ravi Law Corporation's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 8(88.9%) |
| Partial | 1(11.1%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 8200.004 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2009 | 01 1 |
| 2010 | 04 4 |
| 2017 | 01 1 |
| 2021 | 01 1 |
| 2022 | 01 1 |
| 2025 | 01 1 |
Represented Parties
List of parties represented by K Ravi Law Corporation in various cases
| Party Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| Ee Hup Construction Pte LtdAppellant Lost (1) | 1 case |
| Wan Azasar bin Wan YusoffDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
| Kamalnathan a/l MuniandyAppellant Lost (1) | 1 case |
| Chia Kee ChenDefense Lost (1) | 1 case |
| Chai Cher Watt (trading as Chuang Aik Engineering Works)Plaintiff Lost (1) | 1 case |
| Rosman bin AbdullahDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
| Roslan bin BakarDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
| Tang Kheok Hwa Rosemary (trading as R M Martin Supplies and Services)Plaintiff, Appellant Lost (1) | 1 case |
| Akhinur Nashu KaziPlaintiff, Appellant Partial (1) | 1 case |
Case History
Displaying all 9 cases
| Case |
|---|
10 Feb 2025 Ee Hup Construction Pte LtdLost |
17 Apr 2022 Wan Azasar bin Wan YusoffLost |
25 Nov 2021 Kamalnathan a/l MuniandyLost |
16 Jan 2017 Chia Kee ChenLost |
28 Nov 2010 Chai Cher Watt (trading as Chuang Aik Engineering Works)Lost |
13 Sep 2010 Rosman bin AbdullahLost |
21 Apr 2010 Roslan bin BakarLost |
19 Jan 2010 Tang Kheok Hwa Rosemary (trading as R M Martin Supplies and Services)Lost |
07 Jun 2009 Akhinur Nashu KaziPartial |