Public Prosecutor v Wang Jian Bin: Rape of a Minor & Criminal Intimidation

In Public Prosecutor v Wang Jian Bin, the High Court of Singapore sentenced Wang Jian Bin to 13 years' imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane after he pleaded guilty to raping a 13-year-old girl. The court, presided over by Justice Chan Seng Onn, also considered charges of criminal intimidation and penetration of the victim's vagina with his finger. The case involved a claim of rape and criminal intimidation.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Accused sentenced to 13 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Wang Jian Bin was convicted of raping a 13-year-old girl and criminal intimidation, sentenced to 13 years' imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyJudgment for ProsecutionWon
Chua Ying-Hong of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Wang Jian BinDefendant, AppellantIndividualAppeal against sentence filedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chan Seng OnnJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Chua Ying-HongAttorney-General’s Chambers
Lim Bee LiRHT Law LLP
Irving ChohRHT Law LLP

4. Facts

  1. The accused, Wang Jian Bin, pleaded guilty to raping a girl under 14 years of age.
  2. The victim was 13 years old at the time of the offence.
  3. The accused contacted the victim via MSN messenger after finding her email in Teenage magazine.
  4. The accused sent sexually explicit text messages to the victim, asking to meet her.
  5. The accused threatened the victim and her friend when she refused to meet him.
  6. The accused went to the victim's house and repeated his threats.
  7. The accused pushed the victim onto her bed, touched her breasts, and inserted his fingers into her vagina.
  8. The accused raped the victim in her bedroom.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Wang Jian Bin, Criminal Case No 21 of 2011, [2011] SGHC 212

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Accused came to Singapore from China with his family.
Accused became a Singapore citizen.
Accused contacted the victim via MSN messenger.
Accused texted the victim to ask for her address and to meet her at her home.
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Rape
    • Outcome: The accused was convicted of rape.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2006] 4 SLR(R) 849
      • R v Keith Billam (1986) 8 Cr App R (S) 48
  2. Sentencing
    • Outcome: The accused was sentenced to 13 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Related Cases:
      • [2006] 4 SLR(R) 849
      • [2008] 4 SLR(R) 500
      • [1992] 1 SLR(R) 63
  3. Criminal Intimidation
    • Outcome: The charge was taken into consideration for sentencing.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Imprisonment
  2. Caning

9. Cause of Actions

  • Rape
  • Criminal Intimidation

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Sexual Assault

11. Industries

  • Media
  • Technology

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
PP v NFHigh CourtYes[2006] 4 SLR(R) 849SingaporeCited for the four broad categories of rape elucidated in R v Keith Billam for sentencing purposes.
Keith BillamN/AYesR v Keith Billam (1986) 8 Cr App R (S) 48N/ACited for the four broad categories of rape for sentencing purposes.
PP v UICourt of AppealYes[2008] 4 SLR(R) 500SingaporeCited for endorsing the principles and sentencing benchmarks set out in PP v NF.
Chia Kim Heng Frederick v PPN/AYes[1992] 1 SLR(R) 63SingaporeCited for the starting point for sentencing in Category 1 rape cases.
Xia Qin Lai v PPN/AYes[1999] 3 SLR(R) 257SingaporeCited for the principle that a plea of guilt does not ipso facto entitle an offender to a discount in his sentence.
PP v Robiul Bhoreshuddin MondalHigh CourtYes[2010] SGHC 10SingaporeCited for placing weight on the fact that the victim had been raped in the sanctity of her locked room.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 375(1)(b)Singapore
Penal Code s 375(2)Singapore
Penal Code s 506 (first limb)Singapore
Penal Code s 376A(1)(b)Singapore
Penal Code s 376A(3)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Rape
  • Criminal Intimidation
  • Victim
  • Accused
  • MSN Messenger
  • Text Messages
  • Threats
  • Penal Code
  • Sentencing
  • Post-traumatic stress disorder

15.2 Keywords

  • Rape
  • Criminal Intimidation
  • Minor
  • Singapore
  • High Court
  • Sentencing
  • Penal Code

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Rape
  • Sentencing