Rotor Mix v Feng Ming: Breach of Contract & Subletting Dispute over Ready-Mixed Concrete Supply

In 2012, Rotor Mix Pte Ltd sued Feng Ming Construction Pte Ltd in the High Court of Singapore, alleging breach of a ready-mixed concrete supply agreement and a subletting agreement. Rotor Mix claimed Feng Ming failed to purchase the agreed quantity of concrete and sought damages. Feng Ming counterclaimed for outstanding outgoings and reinstatement costs. Justice Lai Siu Chiu dismissed Rotor Mix's claim, finding no contractual obligation for Feng Ming to order a specific quantity of concrete. The court awarded judgment to Feng Ming on its counterclaim for outstanding outgoings, but denied the claim for reinstatement costs due to lack of evidence.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs; Judgment for Defendant on counterclaim.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Rotor Mix sued Feng Ming for breach of contract over a ready-mixed concrete supply agreement. The court dismissed the claim and awarded judgment to Feng Ming on its counterclaim.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Rotor Mix Pte LtdPlaintiffCorporationClaim DismissedLost
Feng Ming Construction Pte LtdDefendantCorporationJudgment for Defendant on counterclaimPartial

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lai Siu ChiuJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff and defendant entered into a subletting agreement for the plaintiff to set up a concrete batching plant on land leased by the defendant.
  2. Plaintiff and defendant entered into a supply agreement for the plaintiff to supply ready-mixed concrete to the defendant for the Jurong Port project.
  3. The supply agreement stated an estimated total quantity of 10,000 cubic meters of concrete.
  4. The defendant purchased only 2,532m3 of ready-mixed concrete from the plaintiff.
  5. The plaintiff terminated the supply agreement and the subletting agreement.
  6. The defendant counterclaimed for outstanding outgoings and reinstatement costs.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Rotor Mix Pte Ltd v Feng Ming Construction Pte Ltd, Suit No 478 of 2011, [2012] SGHC 131

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Defendant informed the plaintiff that it could sublet the Jalan Bahar land to the plaintiff to set up a concrete batching plant.
Defendant stated in a letter to the National Environment Agency the benefits of setting up the concrete batching plant.
Approval for the batching plant was granted by Jurong Town Corporation.
Plaintiff and defendant entered into a subletting agreement.
Defendant secured the contract for the Jurong Port project.
Batching plant was fully set up.
Agreement to supply ready-mixed concrete to the defendant for the Jurong Port project was entered into.
Defendant accepted the supply agreement.
Plaintiff started supplying ready-mixed concrete to the defendant.
Defendant stopped its purchase of ready-mixed concrete from the plaintiff.
Plaintiff reduced the price of ready-mixed concrete by $18.00 per m³.
Defendant allegedly abandoned the supply agreement.
Plaintiff notified the defendant of its intention to terminate the supply agreement and the subletting agreement.
Plaintiff handed over the site to the defendant’s storeman.
Defendant handed the land back to Jurong Town Corporation.
Judgment reserved.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court held that the defendant did not breach the contract by failing to place orders for the shortfall of ready-mixed concrete.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to purchase contractual quantity
      • Unilateral termination of contract
    • Related Cases:
      • [1994] 3 SLR(R) 452
  2. Termination of Subletting Agreement
    • Outcome: The court held that the plaintiff wrongfully terminated the subletting agreement and the defendant was entitled to forfeit the deposit.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Wrongful termination of subletting agreement
      • Forfeiture of deposit

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Loss of profit
  2. Return of deposit
  3. Payment for ready-mixed concrete supplied

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Construction Contracts

11. Industries

  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Turner (East Asia) Pte Ltd v Pioneer Concrete (Singapore) Pte LtdCourt of AppealYes[1994] 3 SLR(R) 452SingaporeCited for the principle that the nature and effect of a contract must be sought from the provisions of the contract themselves, having regard to the circumstances in which the contract came into being.
Percival, Lim v London County Council Asylums and Mental Deficiency CommitteeN/AYesPercival, Lim v London County Council Asylums and Mental Deficiency Committee (1918) 87 LJ KB 677N/ACited for the three types of contracts for the supply of goods and materials.
Chong Ah Kwee and another v Viva Realty Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[1990] 1 SLR(R) 244SingaporeCited to construe the word “estimated” as a warranty.
RDC Concrete Pte Ltd v Seto Kogyo (S) Pte LtdN/AYes[2007] 4 SLR(R) 413SingaporeCited for the situations where a breach of a term in the contract deprived the innocent party of substantially the whole benefit which it was intended to obtain from a contract.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Ready-mixed concrete
  • Subletting agreement
  • Supply agreement
  • Estimated quantity
  • Batching plant
  • Jurong Port project
  • Reinstatement costs
  • Outgoings

15.2 Keywords

  • breach of contract
  • ready-mixed concrete
  • subletting agreement
  • construction
  • Singapore

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Contract Dispute
  • Construction Dispute
  • Subletting