Tan Kah Hin

Tan Kah Hin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and wills and probate. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Acknowledgment of Debt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mutual Wills	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Supply Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Subletting Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ready-Mixed Concrete	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reinstatement Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kah Hin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Kah Hin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Choo Hin & Partners	5 cases	83% of cases	Rotor Mix v Feng Ming: Breach of Contract & Subletting Dispute over Ready-Mixed Concrete Supply(Jun 2012) Rajaratnam Kumar v Estate of Rajaratnam Saravana Muthu: Validity of Mutual Wills Dispute(May 2010) Worldwide Convention Planners v Lee Khiam Long: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Director's Duties(Sep 2008)
Choo Hin and Partners	1 cases	17% of cases	By Products Traders v JAK Alhadad: Refund of Deposits & Misrepresentation in Property Sale(Nov 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Kah Hin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	23.5 parties avg	3.5	33%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Kah Hin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,528,080.07	705,616.015 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rotor Mix v Feng Ming: Breach of Contract & Subletting Dispute over Ready-Mixed Concrete Supply 24 Jun 2012 Feng Ming Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	24 Jun 2012	Feng Ming Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant on counterclaimDefendant was awarded judgment with interest on its counterclaim against the plaintiff for the outstanding outgoings on the Jalan Bahar land to the extent that the sums tallied with the invoices submitted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Rajaratnam Kumar v Estate of Rajaratnam Saravana Muthu: Validity of Mutual Wills Dispute 25 May 2010 Tan Kah Hin (Defendant)Won	25 May 2010	Tan Kah Hin (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Worldwide Convention Planners v Lee Khiam Long: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Director's Duties 14 Sep 2008 Lee Khiam Long (Defendant)Partial	14 Sep 2008	Lee Khiam Long (Defendant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartJudgment on the counterclaim by the first defendant for $111,122.25 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Greenline-Onyx v Otto Systems: Acknowledgment of Debt & 'Without Prejudice' Rule in Settlement Negotiations 25 Apr 2007 Greenline-Onyx Envirotech Phils, Inc (Appellant)Lost	25 Apr 2007	Greenline-Onyx Envirotech Phils, Inc (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of the trial judge was dismissed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Otto Systems v Greenline-Onyx: Acknowledgment of Debt under Settlement Agreement 28 Sep 2006 Greenline-Onyx Envirotech Phils, Inc (Defendant)Lost	28 Sep 2006	Greenline-Onyx Envirotech Phils, Inc (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	By Products Traders v JAK Alhadad: Refund of Deposits & Misrepresentation in Property Sale 25 Nov 2004 David Reginald Ellis Broadley (Plaintiff)Won	25 Nov 2004	David Reginald Ellis Broadley (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; deposit of $2,750,000.00 to be refunded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).