Zeng Min v Mak Weng Tuck: Assessment of Damages for Fatal Collision

In Zeng Min and others v Mak Weng Tuck, the High Court of Singapore assessed damages arising from a fatal collision where Zhang Lan was killed. The plaintiffs, Zeng Min (wife), Zhang Gu (father), and Luo Ping (mother), sued Mak Weng Tuck for depriving them of pecuniary benefits. The court determined the amounts for bereavement, special damages, and dependency claims for the wife and parents, considering factors like the deceased's income, potential salary increments, and the dependants' financial circumstances. The court awarded a total of $261,952.25 in general damages.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for the plaintiffs; damages assessed for bereavement, special damages, and dependency claims.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Assessment of damages arising from a fatal collision. The court determined the dependency claims of the wife and parents of the deceased.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Zeng MinPlaintiffIndividualDependency claim allowedWon
Zhang GuPlaintiffIndividualDependency claim allowedWon
Luo PingPlaintiffIndividualDependency claim allowedWon
Mak Weng TuckDefendantIndividualDamages assessed against defendantLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Terence Tan Zhong WeiAssistant RegistrarYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Zhang Lan died on 21 June 2009 due to injuries sustained in a collision on 20 June 2009.
  2. At the time of the accident, Zhang Lan was working as a research fellow with I2R, earning $4,600.00 per month.
  3. I2R's offer of appointment stated that Zhang Lan's salary would be revised to $4,900.00 upon conferment of a PhD.
  4. Zhang Lan was conferred his PhD on 31 May 2010.
  5. Zeng Min, the wife, was 29 years old at the time of Zhang Lan's death and was working as an engineer earning $3,700.00 per month at the time of the judgement.
  6. Zhang Gu and Luo Ping, the parents, are retired and live in China, receiving monthly pensions of RMB2,659.00 and RMB1,500.00 respectively.
  7. The parents claimed the deceased sent them money since 2004, gave them money during festive occasions, and contributed to their home purchase in 2008.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Zeng Min and others (dependants of Zhang Lan, deceased) v Mak Weng Tuck, Suit No 11 of 2011/S, [2012] SGHCR 9

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Fatal collision between Zhang Lan and Mak Weng Tuck's taxi
Zhang Lan passed away
Zhang Lan conferred PhD
Suit filed by Zeng Min and others
Judgment reserved
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Assessment of Damages
    • Outcome: The court assessed damages for bereavement, special damages, and dependency claims.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [1998] 2 SLR(R) 801
      • [1990] SLR 331
      • [1921] 2 KB 461
      • [1994] 3 SLR(R) 395
      • [1999] 1 SLR(R) 1068
      • [2009] 1 SLR(R) 819
      • [1983-1984] SLR(R) 618
      • [1990] 1 SLR(R) 235
      • [2004] 1 SLR(R) 513
      • [2004] SGHC 21
      • [1992] 1 SLR(R) 535
      • [2004] SGHC 93
      • [1995] SGHC 116
      • [2008] 3 SLR(R) 735
  2. Dependency Claim
    • Outcome: The court determined the dependency claims of the wife and parents of the deceased, considering factors like the deceased's income, potential salary increments, and the dependants' financial circumstances.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [1998] 2 SLR(R) 801
      • [1990] SLR 331
      • [1921] 2 KB 461
      • [1994] 3 SLR(R) 395
      • [1999] 1 SLR(R) 1068
      • [2009] 1 SLR(R) 819
      • [1983-1984] SLR(R) 618
      • [1990] 1 SLR(R) 235
      • [2004] 1 SLR(R) 513
      • [2004] SGHC 21
      • [1992] 1 SLR(R) 535
      • [2004] SGHC 93
      • [1995] SGHC 116
      • [2008] 3 SLR(R) 735

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Damages for pecuniary loss

9. Cause of Actions

  • Wrongful Act Causing Death

10. Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury Litigation

11. Industries

  • Research
  • Technology

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Teo Chee Yeow Aloysius and another v Tan Harry and anotherHigh CourtYes[2004] 3 SLR(R) 588SingaporeCited regarding the appropriate amount to award for costs of obtaining Letters of Administration.
Gul Chandiram Mahtani and another (administrators of the estate of Harbajan Kaur, deceased) v Chain Singh and anotherCourt of AppealYes[1998] 2 SLR(R) 801SingaporeCited for the principle that damages are to be calculated in reference to a reasonable expectation of pecuniary benefit from the continuance of life.
Ng Siew Choo v Tan Kian ChoonHigh CourtYes[1990] SLR 331SingaporeCited for the principle that there is no need to show that the dependant was receiving pecuniary benefit at the time of death; a purely prospective loss is sufficient.
Barnett v CohenKing's BenchYes[1921] 2 KB 461England and WalesCited to illustrate a case where the claim was too speculative.
Ling Kee Ling and another v Leow Leng Siong and othersHigh CourtYes[1994] 3 SLR(R) 395SingaporeCited for the principle that the starting point in the calculation of the multiplier is the number of years that it is anticipated the dependency would have lasted had the deceased not been killed.
Ho Yeow Kim v Lai Hai KuenCourt of AppealYes[1999] 1 SLR(R) 1068SingaporeCited for the principle that the court will consider the age and expected working life of the deceased, as well as the age and expected life span of the dependants in selecting the multiplier.
Balanalagirisamy Gowri Rajeswari and another (administrators of the estate of Radhakrishnan Hari Babu, deceased) v Wong Si WahHigh CourtYes[2009] 1 SLR(R) 819SingaporeCited for the method of ascertaining the deceased's net annual income and deducting from that figure the deceased's own expenses.
See Ah Haw v Ong Hock Thian and anotherHigh CourtYes[1983-1984] SLR(R) 618SingaporeCited for the principle that one should begin by considering the deceased's basic salary to arrive at the deceased's net annual income.
Ng Siew Choo v Tan Kian ChoonHigh CourtYes[1990] 1 SLR(R) 235SingaporeCited for the factors which affect the determination of the multiplicand.
Tan Harry and another v Teo Chee Yeow Aloysius and anotherHigh CourtYes[2004] 1 SLR(R) 513SingaporeCited regarding the consideration of future salary increases in calculating the multiplicand.
Zhang Xiao Ling (personal representative of the Estate of Chan Tak Man, deceased) v Er Swee Poo and AnotherHigh CourtYes[2004] SGHC 21SingaporeCited regarding the application of a percentage increase in salary.
See Soon Soon v Goh Yong Kwang and anotherHigh CourtYes[1992] 1 SLR(R) 535SingaporeCited for the conventional figure of 33% applied to a family unit of husband and wife in calculating the net dependency under the Fatal Accident Acts.
Cheong Gim Fah and Another v Murugian s/o RangasamyHigh CourtYes[2004] SGHC 93SingaporeCited regarding the value of the dependency as claimed by the plaintiff.
Ang Song Huay v Chu Yong ThiamHigh CourtYes[1995] SGHC 116SingaporeCited regarding the multiplier applied to a dependant plaintiff.
Man Mohan Singh s/o Jothirambal Singh and another v Zurich Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd (now known as QBE Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd) and another and another appealCourt of AppealYes[2008] 3 SLR(R) 735SingaporeCited regarding the multiplier for the parents.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Civil Law Act (Cap 43, 1999 Rev Ed)Singapore
Civil Law Act (Cap 43, 1999 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Dependency claim
  • Multiplier
  • Multiplicand
  • Bereavement sum
  • Special damages
  • General damages
  • Letters of Administration
  • Annual Wage Supplement
  • Monthly Variable Component

15.2 Keywords

  • fatal collision
  • assessment of damages
  • dependency claim
  • pecuniary loss
  • wrongful death

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Fatal Accidents
  • Damages
  • Civil Procedure