Anparasan s/o Kamachi

Anparasan s/o Kamachi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 29 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and workplace accident. Their track record shows a 45.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated expertise across 195 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	14 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	13 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	12 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	10 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res ipsa loquitur	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifeguard Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Swimming Pool Safety	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deputyship	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Separability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Waiver of objections	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Revision of Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Complicity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Grievous Hurt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trustee Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trustee Powers	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Force Majeure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting Irregularities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prescription Regulations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Time-Fixing Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joinder of similar offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unreasonable Behaviour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proper Notice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Provisional Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Submission to Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Switch Bills of Lading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Acknowledgment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Total failure of consideration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
House-trespass	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personating a public servant	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Preventive detention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Peremptory orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ship Mortgage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Transnational issue estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Show cause action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Codicils	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quantum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Nuisance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate self-representation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rule in Rylands v Fletcher	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ship Repair	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Diving Accident	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Investment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholding Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collective Sale	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rylands v Fletcher Rule	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ancillary Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lump Sum Maintenance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Homemaker Contributions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gifts in Matrimonial Context	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipwright	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non-Competition Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Heart Attack	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy Chapter 11	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cerebral Palsy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Erinford Injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Custody of Children	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Touting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Trust Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Holding out	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lack of proper notice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Infra petita	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Similar fact evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vexatious and oppressive conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual discretions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anparasan s/o Kamachi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Anparasan s/o Kamachi has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
KhattarWong LLP	13 cases	45% of cases	LQS Construction v Mencast Marine: Unconscionability in Performance Bond Call(Jun 2017) Arnold William v Tanoto Shipyard: Negligence, Contributory Negligence & Duty of Care in Diving Accident(May 2016) SGB Starkstrom v Commissioner for Labour: Work Injury Compensation & Mental Capacity(Apr 2016)
KhattarWong	9 cases	31% of cases	BNM v National University of Singapore: Negligence, Drowning, and Duty of Care(Jan 2014) AQS v AQR: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Wife's Maintenance Post-Divorce(Jan 2012) Keppel Singmarine v Ng Chan Teng: Transfer of Proceedings from District Court to High Court(Mar 2010)
WhiteFern LLC	6 cases	21% of cases	Ee Hup Construction v China Jingye: Performance Bond Call & Unconscionability(Feb 2025) Gomez v Bird & Bird: Professional Negligence Appeal over Enforcement of Judgment Sum(Dec 2022) Chan Hui Peng v Public Utilities Board: Witness Subpoena & Compensation Dispute(Sep 2022)
William Chai & Rama	1 cases	3% of cases	Sim Chiang Lee v Lee Hock Chuan: Negligence, Duty of Care & Rylands v Fletcher(Dec 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anparasan s/o Kamachi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 5 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	112.8 parties avg	2.8	38%
Neutral	23.0 parties avg	3.0	7%
Partial	32.3 parties avg	2.3	10%
Won	133.4 parties avg	3.4	45%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2006	32.8 parties avg	2.8
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	33.7 parties avg	3.7
2015	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	32.8 parties avg	2.8
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	33.8 parties avg	3.8
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anparasan s/o Kamachi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	11(38%)	38%
Neutral	2(7%)	7%
Partial	3(10%)	10%
Won	13(45%)	45%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,592,453.14	75,831.1021 cases	21

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2015	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2016	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 29 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ee Hup Construction v China Jingye: Performance Bond Call & Unconscionability 10 Feb 2025 India International Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent)Neutral	10 Feb 2025	India International Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent): Civil proceedings discontinuedCivil proceedings against India International Insurance Pte Ltd were discontinued; no costs sought.
2	Gomez v Bird & Bird: Professional Negligence Appeal over Enforcement of Judgment Sum 05 Dec 2022 Bird & Bird ATMD LLP (Respondent, Defendant)Won	05 Dec 2022	Bird & Bird ATMD LLP (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Defendant; costs awarded in the amount of $70,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Chan Hui Peng v Public Utilities Board: Witness Subpoena & Compensation Dispute 22 Sep 2022 Public Utilities Board (Defendant)Won	22 Sep 2022	Public Utilities Board (Defendant): WonThe defendant's offer to settle was accepted by the plaintiff, and the court dismissed the claims for payment made by Mr. Sim.
4	Pilgrim v Asian Appraisal: Negligence in Asset Valuation and Loan Security 16 Jan 2022 Asian Appraisal Company Private Limited (Defendant)Won	16 Jan 2022	Asian Appraisal Company Private Limited (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff is to pay costs to the defendant.
5	Sulzer Pumps Spain v Hyflux: Unconscionability & Performance Bond Call Injunction 16 Jun 2020 Sulzer Pumps Spain, SA (Applicant)Lost	16 Jun 2020	Sulzer Pumps Spain, SA (Applicant): Injunction dischargedThe court discharged the injunction that Sulzer Pumps Spain, SA had obtained.
6	Ding Horng Industrial Pte Ltd v Sulzer Singapore Pte Ltd: Corporate Self-Representation and Compliance with Court Orders 03 Jul 2019 Sulzer Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	03 Jul 2019	Sulzer Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Application deniedThe plaintiff's application for leave to appeal was denied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	LQS Construction v Mencast Marine: Unconscionability in Performance Bond Call 28 Jun 2017 First Capital Insurance Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	28 Jun 2017	First Capital Insurance Ltd (Defendant): NeutralFCI was ordered to make payment of the guaranteed sum in 14 days. The outcome is neutral as FCI was merely the issuer of the performance bond.
8	Arnold William v Tanoto Shipyard: Negligence, Contributory Negligence & Duty of Care in Diving Accident 05 May 2016 Tanoto Shipyard Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	05 May 2016	Tanoto Shipyard Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedDefendant's appeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	SGB Starkstrom v Commissioner for Labour: Work Injury Compensation & Mental Capacity 20 Apr 2016 SGB STARKSTROM PTE LTD (Appellant)Lost	20 Apr 2016	SGB STARKSTROM PTE LTD (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant's arguments regarding the validity of the work injury compensation claim and substantive legitimate expectations were rejected.
10	Rahman Lutfar v Scanpile Constructors: Personal Injury Damages Assessment 16 Mar 2016 Scanpile Constructors Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	16 Mar 2016	Scanpile Constructors Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be paid to the Plaintiff in the amount of $426,437.90 (SGD).
11	Haneda Construction v Huttons Asia: Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Property Sale 11 Nov 2015 Huttons Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	11 Nov 2015	Huttons Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; plaintiff to pay costs of $120,000 plus disbursements of $13,100 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Lee Hung Pin v Lim Bee Lian: Unwinding Winding Up Due to Procedural Irregularities and Company Matters 30 Jun 2015 Lim Bee Lian (Defendant)Won	30 Jun 2015	Lim Bee Lian (Defendant): Application dismissedThe defendant successfully opposed the plaintiff's application to unwind the winding up of the company. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Chua Ser Kenon v Karuppiah Jai Sankar: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury 07 May 2015 Chua Ser Kenon (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	07 May 2015	Chua Ser Kenon (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Assistant Registrar's award of a nominal sum of $1,000 for loss of future earnings and dismissal of the claim for loss of earning capacity were upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Tan Lip Tiong v Commissioner of Labour: Mental Capacity Act & Work Injury Compensation 01 Apr 2015 SBG Starkstrom Pte Ltd (Respondent, Applicant)Lost	01 Apr 2015	SBG Starkstrom Pte Ltd (Respondent, Applicant): Application DismissedThe court dismissed OS 918.
15	Maryani Sadeli v Arjun Permanand Samtani: Equitable Compensation & Breach of Fiduciary Duties in Horizon Towers Collective Sale 19 Nov 2014 Mamata Kapildev Dave (Respondent)Won	19 Nov 2014	Mamata Kapildev Dave (Respondent): Appeal DismissedCosts of $30,000 awarded against the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	BNM v National University of Singapore: Negligence Claim for Drowning at NUS Swimming Pool 25 Sep 2014 National University of Singapore (Respondent, Appellant)Won	25 Sep 2014	National University of Singapore (Respondent, Appellant): Cross-Appeal DismissedCross-appeal dismissed; awarded costs of $12,000 from the Appellant's security deposit (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	BNM v National University of Singapore: Negligence, Drowning, and Duty of Care 08 Jan 2014 National University of Singapore (Defendant)Won	08 Jan 2014	National University of Singapore (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against the National University of Singapore was dismissed as the court found that the negligence of the lifeguards did not cause the Deceased's death. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	BNJ v SMRT Trains: Negligence, Occupier's Liability, and Breach of Duty in MRT Accident 30 Dec 2013 Land Transport Authority of Singapore (Defendant)Won	30 Dec 2013	Land Transport Authority of Singapore (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed.
19	Shaik Abu Bakar v Saag Oilfield & PPL Shipyard: Negligence Claim for Workplace Injury 17 Dec 2012 PPL Shipyard Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	17 Dec 2012	PPL Shipyard Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantJudgment against the second defendant for 50% of the damages to be assessed by the Registrar, due to contributory negligence. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Zeng Min v Mak Weng Tuck: Assessment of Damages for Fatal Collision 10 Jul 2012 Mak Weng Tuck (Defendant)Lost	10 Jul 2012	Mak Weng Tuck (Defendant): Damages assessed against defendantDamages assessed against the defendant for bereavement, special damages, and dependency claims (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	AQS v AQR: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Wife's Maintenance Post-Divorce 11 Jan 2012 AQS (Appellant)Partial	11 Jan 2012	AQS (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe wife was awarded 20% of the matrimonial assets (consisting of the matrimonial flat and the two Australian properties assessed at $2.5m). The outstanding maintenance payments ie $200,000 was to be paid in four (4) equal quarterly instalments commencing on 31 October 2011. The Judge’s order that the wife was to attend anger management counselling with a psychiatrist approved by the husband and at the husband’s expense was to remain. The wife was to move out of the matrimonial flat and hand over the keys to the husband on or before 30 November 2011. All other orders made below remained. The wife was awarded costs of $5000 plus disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Keppel Singmarine v Ng Chan Teng: Transfer of Proceedings from District Court to High Court 09 Mar 2010 Keppel Singmarine Dockyard Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	09 Mar 2010	Keppel Singmarine Dockyard Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs here and below. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
23	Hengxin Technology v Jiang Wei: Breach of Contract & Non-Compete Dispute 18 Nov 2009 Hengxin Technology Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	18 Nov 2009	Hengxin Technology Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of contract and fiduciary duties was dismissed.
24	Ng Chan Teng v Keppel Singmarine: District Court Jurisdiction & Damages for Industrial Accident 06 Sep 2007 Keppel Singmarine Dockyard Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	06 Sep 2007	Keppel Singmarine Dockyard Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal LostThe appeal was lost, meaning the defendant's argument regarding the calculation of damages was rejected.
25	NK v NL: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Wife Maintenance, Child Custody & Welfare 18 Jul 2007 NL (Respondent)Partial	18 Jul 2007	NL (Respondent): Appeal partially unsuccessfulAppeal partially unsuccessful. The court adjusted the division of matrimonial assets in the wife's favor, but affirmed the maintenance order and custody arrangements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
26	NTUC Income v Next of Kin of Narayasamy: Workmen's Compensation for Heart Attack Suffered During Employment 12 Sep 2006 NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Ltd (Applicant)Lost	12 Sep 2006	NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedThe application to reverse the Commissioner's decision was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
27	Tesa Tape v Wing Seng: Negligence, Nuisance & Rylands v Fletcher - Container Depot Liability 02 May 2006 Wing Seng Logistics Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	02 May 2006	Wing Seng Logistics Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28	Siah Eng Hock v Tan Cheng Huat: Negligence in Traffic Accident at Choa Chu Kang Way 26 Feb 2006 Tan Cheng Huat (Defendant)Won	26 Feb 2006	Tan Cheng Huat (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the first defendant. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
29	Sim Chiang Lee v Lee Hock Chuan: Negligence, Duty of Care & Rylands v Fletcher 04 Dec 2000 Second Defendants (Defendant)Won	04 Dec 2000	Second Defendants (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs' claim against the first and second defendants was dismissed.