HSBC Trust v Chief Assessor: Property Tax Assessment & Annual Value of Shopping Center Units

In HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Ltd v Chief Assessor, the Court of Appeal of Singapore, on 17 January 2013, addressed whether the depreciation of asset items in a shopping center's common area should be included in the gross rent when computing the annual value of units for property tax assessment. HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Ltd, as the trustee of CapitaMall Trust, appealed against the High Court's decision, which favored the Chief Assessor's ruling to include the depreciation component. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, holding that the depreciation component should be included in the annual value of each unit.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal

1.2 Outcome

Appeal dismissed with costs.

1.3 Case Type

Tax

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The court determined whether depreciation of common area assets should be included in gross rent when computing the annual value for property tax.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) LtdAppellantCorporationAppeal DismissedLostTan Kay Kheng, Tan Shao Tong, Novella Chan
Chief AssessorRespondentGovernment AgencyJudgment for RespondentWonFoo Hui Min, Joanna Yap, Alvin Chia

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Sundaresh MenonChief JusticeNo
Chao Hick TinJustice of the Court of AppealYes
V K RajahJustice of the Court of AppealNo

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Tan Kay KhengWongPartnership LLP
Tan Shao TongWongPartnership LLP
Novella ChanWongPartnership LLP
Foo Hui MinInland Revenue Authority of Singapore
Joanna YapInland Revenue Authority of Singapore
Alvin ChiaInland Revenue Authority of Singapore

4. Facts

  1. HSBC Institutional Trust Services is the trustee of CapitaMall Trust, which owns Bugis Junction.
  2. Bugis Junction is a shopping center with 180 units leased to various businesses.
  3. Asset Items include escalators, lifts, air-conditioning, and fire safety systems.
  4. Tenants paid $0.20 per square foot per month, included in gross rent, for asset depreciation.
  5. The Chief Assessor ruled that the depreciation component should not be excluded from annual value.
  6. The Valuation Review Board initially found for the Appellant, excluding the depreciation component.
  7. The High Court reversed the Board's decision, including the depreciation component in annual value.

5. Formal Citations

  1. HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Ltd v Chief Assessor, Civil Appeal No 80 of 2012, [2013] SGCA 4
  2. Chief Assessor v HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Ltd, , [2012] 3 SLR 933
  3. BCH Retail Investment Pte Ltd v Chief Assessor, , [2007] 2 SLR(R) 580
  4. Tan Hee Liang v Chief Assessor and another, , [2009] 1 SLR(R) 335
  5. Bell Property Trust Limited v Assessment Committee for the Borough of Hampstead, , [1940] 2 KB 543
  6. BCH Retail Investment Pte Ltd v Chief Assessor, , [2002] 2 SLR(R) 973
  7. First DCS Pte Ltd v Chief Assessor and another, , [2007] 3 SLR(R) 326
  8. Chief Assessor and another v First DCS Pte Ltd, , [2008] 2 SLR(R) 724
  9. Pullen v St Saviour’s Union, , [1900] 1 QB 138
  10. Chartered Bank v The City Council of Singapore, , [1959–1986] SPTC 1
  11. Hamilton v National Coal Board, , [1960] AC 633

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Valuation Review Board found for the Appellant.
Decision from which this appeal arose is reported.
Judgment reserved.
Valuation year.
Valuation year.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Annual Value Computation
    • Outcome: The court held that the depreciation component of asset items should be included in the annual value computation.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Inclusion of depreciation component in gross rent
      • Exclusion of cost of services from gross rent
    • Related Cases:
      • [2012] 3 SLR 933
      • [2007] 2 SLR(R) 580
      • [2009] 1 SLR(R) 335
  2. Interpretation of 'Annual Value' under Property Tax Act
    • Outcome: The court clarified the test for determining whether an expense should be excluded from the annual value, focusing on whether it relates to the use or occupation of the heritable subject.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Meaning of 'rent or letting'
      • Application of fixture and enhancement tests
    • Related Cases:
      • [2007] 2 SLR(R) 580
      • [2009] 1 SLR(R) 335
      • [1940] 2 KB 543

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Exclusion of depreciation component from annual value computation

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Tax Assessment
  • Property Valuation

11. Industries

  • Real Estate
  • Retail

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Chief Assessor v HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) LtdHigh CourtYes[2012] 3 SLR 933SingaporeThe High Court decision which is being appealed against in the current judgment.
BCH Retail Investment Pte Ltd v Chief AssessorCourt of AppealYes[2007] 2 SLR(R) 580SingaporeCited for the principle that the annual value of a property must include only elements of rent or letting.
Tan Hee Liang v Chief Assessor and anotherHigh CourtYes[2009] 1 SLR(R) 335SingaporeCited for affirming the principle that the annual value of a property must include only elements of rent or letting.
Bell Property Trust Limited v Assessment Committee for the Borough of HampsteadKBYes[1940] 2 KB 543England and WalesCited for the principle that the cost of services could be deducted from the gross rent for the purposes of calculating the gross value.
Chartered Bank v The City Council of SingaporeSingapore High CourtYes[1959–1986] SPTC 1SingaporeCited for the principle that the cost of services and depreciation of equipment could be excluded from a computation of annual value.
Pullen v St Saviour’s UnionQBYes[1900] 1 QB 138England and WalesCited as an example of a case that was incorrectly decided regarding the inclusion of costs for services in the gross value of tenements.
BCH Retail Investment Pte Ltd v Chief AssessorHigh CourtYes[2002] 2 SLR(R) 973SingaporeCited for the proposition that the cost of services are deductible from the gross rent when computing the annual value under the Property Tax Act.
First DCS Pte Ltd v Chief Assessor and anotherHigh CourtYes[2007] 3 SLR(R) 326SingaporeCited for holding that escalators, lifts and air-conditioning units were not excluded from assessment under s 2(2) of the Property Tax Act.
Chief Assessor and another v First DCS Pte LtdHigh CourtYes[2008] 2 SLR(R) 724SingaporeCited for the principle that expenses related to fixtures which are components of the heritable subject are related to rent or letting.
Hamilton v National Coal BoardHouse of LordsYes[1960] AC 633United KingdomCited for defining 'maintain' in the context of the Mines and Quarries Act 1954 (c 70) (UK).

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Property Tax Act (Cap 254, 2005 Rev Ed)Singapore
Property Tax Act (Cap 254, 2005 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Annual Value
  • Depreciation Component
  • Gross Rent
  • Asset Items
  • Property Tax
  • Rent or Letting
  • Fixture Test
  • Enhancement Test
  • Qualifying Words
  • Heritable Subject

15.2 Keywords

  • property tax
  • annual value
  • depreciation
  • assessment
  • shopping center
  • Singapore
  • CapitaMall Trust
  • HSBC
  • Chief Assessor

16. Subjects

  • Property Tax
  • Valuation
  • Depreciation
  • Real Estate

17. Areas of Law

  • Property Tax Law
  • Tax Law
  • Real Estate Law