Fatimah bte Kumin Lim v Attorney-General: Extradition, Bail Application, Criminal Procedure Code

In Fatimah bte Kumin Lim v Attorney-General, the High Court of Singapore heard an application for bail by Fatimah bte Kumin Lim, who was the subject of an extradition request from the United Kingdom for alleged theft. The court, presided over by Justice Woo Bih Li, dismissed the application, holding that the High Court's power to grant bail in extradition proceedings is circumscribed by section 95(1)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Application for bail dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court considered an application for bail in extradition proceedings, focusing on the interpretation of the Criminal Procedure Code.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Fatimah bte Kumin LimApplicantIndividualApplication DismissedLostThong Chee Kun, Hamidul Haq, Istyana Ibrahim, Wong Shi Yun
Attorney-GeneralRespondentGovernment AgencyApplication DismissedWonKow Keng Siong, Luke Tan

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Woo Bih LiJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Thong Chee KunRajah & Tann LLP
Hamidul HaqRajah & Tann LLP
Istyana IbrahimRajah & Tann LLP
Wong Shi YunRajah & Tann LLP
Kow Keng SiongAttorney-General's Chambers
Luke TanAttorney-General's Chambers

4. Facts

  1. The Applicant was the subject of an extradition request from the UK for alleged offences under s 1 of the Theft Act 1968 (UK).
  2. A warrant for the arrest of the Applicant was issued by the Hammersmith Magistrates’ Court on 3 May 2012.
  3. A warrant of apprehension was issued under s 24 of the Extradition Act on 21 May 2013, and the Applicant was arrested on the same day.
  4. The Applicant was initially employed by Mariam Aziz as a badminton coach and later became her bodyguard and personal assistant.
  5. The Applicant borrowed two diamonds from Mariam Aziz’s daughter, Afifa Abdullah, and allegedly sold the originals after arranging for copies to be made.
  6. The diamonds were purchased by a third party on 23 December 2009 for US$7,083,972.86.
  7. The deception was uncovered when Mariam Aziz asked for the ‘blue diamond’ to be resized and it was discovered to be counterfeit.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Fatimah bte Kumin Lim v Attorney-General, Criminal Motion No 30 of 2013, [2013] SGHC 232

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Applicant employed by Mariam Aziz as badminton coach.
Applicant borrowed diamonds from Afifa Abdullah.
Diamonds handed to Applicant.
Diamonds purchased by third party.
Warrant for arrest of Applicant issued by Hammersmith Magistrates’ Court.
Disposition sworn at the Westminster Magistrates’ Court.
Warrant of apprehension issued under s 24 of the Extradition Act; Applicant arrested.
Applicant filed application to be released on bail.
Application for bail dismissed.
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Bail Application
    • Outcome: The court held that the High Court's power to grant bail in extradition proceedings is circumscribed by s 95(1)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Related Cases:
      • [2011] 4 SLR 868
      • [2012] 3 SLR 749
  2. Interpretation of Statutes
    • Outcome: The court considered the principles of statutory interpretation in determining the meaning of the relevant provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Bail

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Extradition Proceedings

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Mohamed Hisham bin Sapandi v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2011] 4 SLR 868SingaporeDiscusses the High Court's power to grant bail under s 97(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and whether it is fettered by s 95(1).
Christanto Radius v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2012] 3 SLR 749SingaporeDeals with an application for bail in extradition proceedings and the High Court's power to grant bail under s 97 CPC 2010.
S Selvamsylvester v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2005] 4 SLR(R) 409SingaporeConsiders whether bail can be offered for all offences, including those punishable with death or imprisonment for life, under the Criminal Procedure Code.
King Emperor v Nga San Htwa and othersFull BenchYesAIR 1927 Rangoon 205IndiaDiscusses the extent to which a court's discretion to release an accused on bail is fettered by the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Emperor v Joglekar and othersFull BenchYesAIR 1931 All 504IndiaDeals with the discretion of the High Court or the Court of Session to admit an accused person to bail under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Gurcharan Singh & Ors v State (Delhi Administration)Supreme CourtYes1978 AIR 179IndiaInvolves the revocation of bail previously granted and the applicable law under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Re K S MenonHigh CourtYes[1946] 12 MLJ 49MalaysiaDeals with the discretion of a judge of the High Court to grant bail free from the limitations of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Shanmugam v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[1971] 1 MLJ 283MalaysiaDiscusses the power of a president or magistrate to grant bail under the Criminal Procedure Code.
Public Prosecutor v Dato Balwant Singh (No 1)High CourtYes[2002] 4 MLJ 427MalaysiaConcerns the medical exception in the Criminal Procedure Code and whether the prohibited circumstances for granting bail arose.
Wright v HenkelSupreme CourtYes190 US 40 (1903)United States of AmericaDeals with the admission to bail in cases of foreign extradition and the obligations of the government to surrender the accused.
Thomas Beaulieu v James HartiganUnited States District Court for the District of MassachusettsYes430 F Supp 915 (1977)United States of AmericaDeals with the granting of bail pending completion of extradition proceedings.
Thomas Beaulieu v James HartiganUnited States Court of Appeals, First CircuitYes554 F 2d 1 (1st Cir, 1977)United States of AmericaDeals with the granting of bail pending completion of extradition proceedings.
Parretti v USUnited States Court of Appeals, Ninth CircuitYes122 F 3d 758 (9th Cir, 1997)United States of AmericaDeals with the granting of bail pending completion of extradition proceedings.
United Mexican States v CabalHigh CourtYes[2001] HCA 60AustraliaDeals with the granting of bail pending completion of extradition proceedings.
Vasiljkovic v CommonwealthHigh CourtYes[2006] HCA 40AustraliaDeals with the granting of bail pending completion of extradition proceedings.
Sek Kon Kim v Attorney-GeneralHigh CourtYes[1984] 1 MLJ 60MalaysiaDeals with the granting of bail pending completion of extradition proceedings.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Extradition Act (Cap 103, 2000 Rev Ed)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (Act 15 of 2010)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed)Singapore
Theft Act 1968 (c 60)United Kingdom
Interpretation Act (Cap 1, 2002 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Extradition
  • Bail
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Warrant of Apprehension
  • Fugitive
  • Presumption of Innocence
  • Special Circumstances
  • Extradition Act
  • Committal Hearing

15.2 Keywords

  • Extradition
  • Bail
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Singapore
  • High Court
  • Fugitive
  • Theft
  • Diamonds

16. Subjects

  • Extradition
  • Criminal Law
  • Bail
  • Statutory Interpretation

17. Areas of Law

  • Extradition Law
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Constitutional Law