Hamidul Haq

Hamidul Haq is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 25 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and extradition law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Hamidul Haq has demonstrated expertise across 89 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	24 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 24 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	14 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extradition Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Match-fixing	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice14% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Import and Export Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Manpower Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receiving stolen property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bail	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Agencies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegal importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities and Futures Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rule of Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Review of Detention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Trespass	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asylum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Charitable Giving	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Services Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sports Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Endangered Species Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hamidul Haq has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Hamidul Haq has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	9 cases	36% of cases	Ding Si Yang v Public Prosecutor: Bail Pending Appeal for Corruption Charges(Feb 2015) Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act for Match-Fixing(Jan 2015) Ding Si Yang v PP: Match-Fixing, Corruption, and Sentencing in Football(Jan 2015)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	5 cases	20% of cases	Ng Keng Yong v PP: Negligence Causing Death at Sea, Collision Regulations Breach(Aug 2004) Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Ridwan: Sentencing for Grievous Hurt with Dangerous Weapons under Penal Code(Mar 2003) Wong Soon Lee v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Outrage of Modesty(Sep 2002)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	4 cases	16% of cases	Navayo International AG v Ministry of Defence: Enforcement of Arbitral Award & Public Policy(Apr 2024) Lim Jun Yao Clarence v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Trading under Companies Act(Oct 2022) Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention Order & Limits of Executive Power under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act(Nov 2015)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	4 cases	16% of cases	Chan Chan Wah v PP: Receiving Stolen Property & Knowledge of Theft(Nov 2004) Low Lin Lin v Public Prosecutor: Cocaine Possession, Presumption of Possession, Adverse Inference(Aug 2002) Public Prosecutor v Tan Lian Tiong: Negligence, Road Accidents, and Causation of Death(Jul 2002)
Public Prosecutor	2 cases	8% of cases	Yeoh Aik Wei v PP: Import of Diamorphine & Presumption of Knowledge(Feb 2003) Public Prosecutor v Kuah Kok Choon: Illegal Possession of Endangered Lear's Macaws(Nov 2000)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	4% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Mark Kalaivanan: Rape and Abetment of Rape at Newton Hawker Centre(Aug 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Hamidul Haq's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 5 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	112.9 parties avg	2.9	44%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	8%
Won	133.5 parties avg	3.5	52%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	24.4 parties avg	4.4
2013	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2015	53.5 parties avg	3.5
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Hamidul Haq's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	11(42%)	42%
Partial	2(8%)	8%
Won	13(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,008,500.00	401,700.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2003	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2013	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	5 32	Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 25 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Navayo International AG v Ministry of Defence: Enforcement of Arbitral Award & Public Policy 21 Apr 2024 Ministry of Defence, Government of Indonesia (Defendant)Lost	21 Apr 2024	Ministry of Defence, Government of Indonesia (Defendant): Application for extension of time to file SUM 589 dismissedApplication for extension of time to file SUM 589 dismissed; assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lim Jun Yao Clarence v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Trading under Companies Act 09 Oct 2022 Lim Jun Yao Clarence (Appellant)Lost	09 Oct 2022	Lim Jun Yao Clarence (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appellant's appeal against conviction, sentence and compensation order was dismissed.
3	Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention Order & Limits of Executive Power under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act 24 Nov 2015 Tan Seet Eng (Appellant)Won	24 Nov 2015	Tan Seet Eng (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the conclusion we have reached makes it unnecessary for us to deal with two other grounds of challenge raised by the Appellant, namely, irrationality and procedural irregularity. It follows that the Appellant should be freed and the costs order made against him below should be set aside. We will hear the parties on any other issues that remain outstanding, including the question of costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	PP v Ng Sae Kiat: Securities Fraud & CFD Manipulation Appeal 29 Jul 2015 Tan Kian Ming, Joseph (Respondent)Won	29 Jul 2015	Tan Kian Ming, Joseph (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Prosecution’s appeal against the sentence imposed on Tan Kian Ming, Joseph was dismissed.
5	Ding Si Yang v Public Prosecutor: Bail Pending Appeal for Corruption Charges 01 Feb 2015 Ding Si Yang (Applicant)Lost	01 Feb 2015	Ding Si Yang (Applicant): Motion dismissedThe Applicant's motion for bail pending appeal was dismissed.
6	Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act for Match-Fixing 21 Jan 2015 Tan Seet Eng (Applicant)Lost	21 Jan 2015	Tan Seet Eng (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for an Order for Review of Detention was dismissed. The Applicant was ordered to pay the Attorney-General costs of $8,500, inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Ding Si Yang v PP: Match-Fixing, Corruption, and Sentencing in Football 15 Jan 2015 Ding Si Yang (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	15 Jan 2015	Ding Si Yang (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed with respect to sentenceDing's appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
8	Fatimah bte Kumin Lim v Attorney-General: Extradition, Bail Application, Criminal Procedure Code 05 Nov 2013 Fatimah bte Kumin Lim (Applicant)Lost	05 Nov 2013	Fatimah bte Kumin Lim (Applicant): Application DismissedThe applicant's application for bail was dismissed.
9	Hia Soo Gan Benson v PP: Extradition, Criminal Procedure - Jurisdiction and Appeal 14 Jul 2013 Hia Soo Gan Benson (Applicant)Lost	14 Jul 2013	Hia Soo Gan Benson (Applicant): Criminal motion dismissedCriminal motion dismissed as the Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal against the Judgment and leave should not be granted for the Parties’ questions of law to be referred to the Court of Appeal under s 397(1) of CPC 2010.
10	Wong Yuh Lan v Public Prosecutor: Extradition, Conspiracy to Defraud the US, Export Regulations 06 Aug 2012 Hia Soo Gan Benson (Applicant)Lost	06 Aug 2012	Hia Soo Gan Benson (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for Order for Review of Detention dismissed.
11	Christanto Radius v Public Prosecutor: Extradition, Bail, and Criminal Procedure Code 23 May 2012 Christanto Radius (Applicant)Won	23 May 2012	Christanto Radius (Applicant): Bail GrantedBail granted at $2,000,000 in two sureties with specific conditions.
12	Goh Kah Heng v Public Prosecutor: Falsification, Misappropriation & False Information to Charities Commissioner 26 May 2010 Goh Kah Heng (alias Shi Ming Yi) (Appellant)Partial	26 May 2010	Goh Kah Heng (alias Shi Ming Yi) (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part.Appeal against conviction dismissed. Appeal against sentence allowed in part, with the aggregate imprisonment term reduced from 10 months to 6 months. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Goh Kah Heng v Public Prosecutor: Application to Transfer Trial to High Court 11 Mar 2009 Goh Kah Heng (alias Shi Ming Yi) (Applicant)Lost	11 Mar 2009	Goh Kah Heng (alias Shi Ming Yi) (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication to transfer the trial from the District Court to the High Court was dismissed.
14	Chan Chan Wah v PP: Receiving Stolen Property & Knowledge of Theft 03 Nov 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Nov 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against conviction.
15	Ng Keng Yong v PP: Negligence Causing Death at Sea, Collision Regulations Breach 12 Aug 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	12 Aug 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction.
16	Public Prosecutor v Mark Kalaivanan: Rape and Abetment of Rape at Newton Hawker Centre 10 Aug 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	10 Aug 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty as charged and convictedAll three accused were found guilty as charged and convicted.
17	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Ridwan: Sentencing for Grievous Hurt with Dangerous Weapons under Penal Code 04 Mar 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Mar 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentences imposedSentences of imprisonment and caning imposed on all five accused.
18	Yeoh Aik Wei v PP: Import of Diamorphine & Presumption of Knowledge 05 Feb 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	05 Feb 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction for unauthorized import of diamorphine was dismissed.
19	Wong Soon Lee v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Outrage of Modesty 16 Sep 2002 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	16 Sep 2002	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Sentence variedThe High Court upheld the imprisonment sentence but set aside the caning sentence.
20	Low Lin Lin v Public Prosecutor: Cocaine Possession, Presumption of Possession, Adverse Inference 29 Aug 2002 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Aug 2002	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment upheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction for possession of cocaine.
21	Public Prosecutor v Tan Lian Tiong: Negligence, Road Accidents, and Causation of Death 21 Jul 2002 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	21 Jul 2002	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe prosecution's appeal against the respondent's acquittal was dismissed.
22	PP v Tubbs: Negligence, Road Accidents, and Standard of Care for Drivers 05 Aug 2001 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	05 Aug 2001	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe prosecution's appeal against the acquittal was dismissed.
23	PP v Saeng-Un Udom: Murder Conviction for Fatal Head Injuries Inflicted with Metal Rod during Quarrel 10 Jan 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	10 Jan 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of murder.
24	Public Prosecutor v Kuah Kok Choon: Illegal Possession of Endangered Lear's Macaws 22 Nov 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution, Appellant)Won	22 Nov 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution, Appellant): Appeal allowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against Kuah Kok Choon's acquittal was allowed.
25	Tee Teng Heng v PP: Criminal Trespass, Intent to Annoy, and Requisite Evidence 12 Nov 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	12 Nov 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentAppeal dismissed; original sentence upheld and enhanced (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).