Sarawak Timber v Asia Pulp: Enforcement of Malaysian Judgment on Unpaid Share Capital

The Singapore High Court heard an appeal by Sarawak Timber Industry Development Corp (STIDC) and State Financial Secretary Incorporated (SFS) against Asia Pulp & Paper Co Ltd (APP), regarding the enforcement of a Malaysian court order. The Malaysian court had granted a liquidator leave to make a call on APP for unpaid share capital in Borneo Pulp & Paper Sdn Bhd (BPP). The High Court allowed the appeal, reinstating the registration of the Malaysian court order, finding that it was an order for a sum of money and that the delay in registration was justified.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Allowed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore High Court allows enforcement of a Malaysian court order for unpaid share capital against Asia Pulp & Paper, addressing registration delays.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Judith PrakashJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Sarawak HC made a winding up order in respect of BPP.
  2. APP, STDIC, and SFS were shareholders of BPP.
  3. Liquidator applied for leave to make a call on APP for unpaid share capital.
  4. Liquidator issued a report stating all creditors of BPP had been paid.
  5. Liquidator sought to set off the sum payable to APP from the sum to be called from APP.
  6. Sarawak HC granted the Liquidator leave to make a call on APP.
  7. Liquidator served a call on APP for the sum of RM117m.
  8. APP did not make any payment to STDIC and SFS.
  9. APP appealed against the Sarawak HC’s decisions, but the appeal was dismissed.
  10. STIDC and SFS commenced Originating Summons in Singapore to enforce their right to payment.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Sarawak Timber Industry Development Corp and another v Asia Pulp & Paper Co Ltd, Originating Summons No 1075 of 2012 (Registrar's Appeal No 109 of 2013), [2013] SGHC 243

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Sarawak High Court made a winding up order in respect of Borneo Pulp & Paper Sdn Bhd.
Liquidator applied for leave from the Sarawak High Court to make a call on APP.
Liquidator issued a report on the status of the liquidation of BPP.
Liquidator filed a Notice of Motion seeking orders from the Sarawak High Court.
Sarawak High Court heard the SIC application and the NOM together.
Liquidator served a call on APP for the sum of RM117m.
Malaysian Court of Appeal dismissed APP's appeal.
STIDC and SFS commenced Originating Summons No 1075 of 2012 in Singapore.
Assistant Registrar granted orders in terms of OS 1075.
APP applied to set aside the AR’s decision.
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Enforceability of Foreign Judgment
    • Outcome: The court held that the Relevant Order was a judgment for a sum of money and allowed the late registration of the order.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Whether the Relevant Order is for a sum of money
      • Whether it was too late to apply to register the Relevant Order
    • Related Cases:
      • [2009] 2 SLR(R) 166
  2. Delay in Registration of Foreign Judgment
    • Outcome: The court found that the delay was not inordinate and that the judgment debtor had not demonstrated prejudice.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Reasonable explanation for delay
      • Prejudice to the judgment debtor
    • Related Cases:
      • [2009] 2 SLR(R) 166

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Registration of Foreign Judgment
  2. Enforcement of Payment

9. Cause of Actions

  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgment
  • Debt Recovery

10. Practice Areas

  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Insolvency Law

11. Industries

  • Timber
  • Pulp and Paper

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Westacre Investments Inc v The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (also known as Jugoimport-SDPR)Court of AppealYes[2009] 2 SLR(R) 166SingaporeCited for the approach to take when faced with a late application to register a foreign judgment under the Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act.
In re Peter Lalor Home Building Co-operative Society Limited (in liquidation; Tuckman v DunlopSupreme Court of VictoriaYes[1958] VR 165AustraliaCited regarding the creation of a new cause of action when a call of unpaid capital is made by a liquidator in winding up proceedings.
Duer v FrazerEngland and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division)Yes[2001] 1 WLR 919England and WalesCited as an example of a situation in which a judgment debtor may rely on prejudice to resist late registration of a judgment.
Deutsche Bank AG and another v Asia Pulp & Paper Co LtdCourt of AppealYes[2003] 2 SLR(R) 320SingaporeCited regarding APP's insolvency and lack of significant tangible assets or operations in Singapore.
Deutsche Bank AG and another v Asia Pulp & Paper Co LtdHigh CourtYes[2002] SGHC 257SingaporeCited regarding APP's insolvency and lack of significant tangible assets or operations in Singapore.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Malaysian Companies (Winding Up) Rules 1972
Singapore Companies (Winding Up) Rules (Cap 50, R 1, 2006 Rev Ed)

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act (Cap 264, 1985 Rev Ed)Singapore
Malaysian Companies Act 1965Malaysia
Singapore Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Winding up order
  • Liquidator
  • Call on unpaid share capital
  • Contributories
  • Rights of enforcement
  • Balance Payment
  • Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act
  • Sarawak High Court
  • Malaysian Court of Appeal

15.2 Keywords

  • Foreign Judgment
  • Enforcement
  • Winding Up
  • Share Capital
  • Singapore
  • Malaysia

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
  • Company Law
  • Insolvency Law