Li Jianlin v Asnah bte AB Rahman: Negligence, Pedestrian Safety, and Road Traffic Accident

In Li Jianlin v Asnah bte AB Rahman, the High Court of Singapore heard a case regarding a road traffic accident. The plaintiff, Li Jianlin, was hit by a taxi driven by the defendant, Asnah bte AB Rahman, while crossing a road at a pedestrian crossing with the lights in his favor. The court, presided over by Justice Choo Han Teck, found the defendant negligent and ruled in favor of the plaintiff, determining that the defendant's negligence was the sole cause of the accident. The court rejected the defendant's argument of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Judgment for the plaintiff.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment Reserved

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court found the defendant taxi driver liable for negligence in a road accident, causing injury to the plaintiff pedestrian. The court rejected contributory negligence.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Li JianlinPlaintiffIndividualJudgment for the plaintiffWonEric Liew Hwee Tong, Rebecca Chia Wei Lin
Asnah bte AB RahmanDefendantIndividualJudgment against the defendantLostAnthony Wee

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Eric Liew Hwee TongGabriel Law Corporation
Rebecca Chia Wei LinGabriel Law Corporation
Anthony WeeUnited Legal Alliance LLC

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiff was crossing Bukit Batok West Avenue 5 at a pedestrian crossing with the lights in his favour.
  2. The defendant's taxi hit the plaintiff while he was two or three steps into the right lane.
  3. The defendant driver pleaded guilty to a charge under s 64(1) of the Road Traffic Act for dangerous driving.
  4. The impact of the collision was caused by the front right side of the taxi.
  5. The plaintiff suffered injuries to his head and hips, including fractures.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Li Jianlin v Asnah bte AB Rahman, Suit No 720 of 2013, [2014] SGHC 198

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Plaintiff knocked down by taxi
Suit filed
Judgment Reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Negligence
    • Outcome: The court found the defendant negligent.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Contributory Negligence
    • Outcome: The court found that the plaintiff had not contributed to the accident.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence

10. Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents

11. Industries

  • Transportation

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Powell v PhillipsN/AYes[1972] 3 All ER 864N/ACited to show that pedestrians are not legally required to wear high visibility clothing.
Probert v MooreN/AYes[2012] EWHC 2324N/ACited to show that pedestrians are not legally required to wear high visibility clothing.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Highway Code (Cap 276, R 11, 1990 Rev Ed) Rule 8

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Road Traffic Act (Cap 276, 2004 Rev Ed) s 64(1)Singapore
Evidence Act (Cap 97, 1997 Rev Ed) s 45ASingapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Pedestrian crossing
  • Contributory negligence
  • Road traffic accident
  • Dangerous driving
  • Traffic lights

15.2 Keywords

  • negligence
  • road accident
  • pedestrian
  • traffic
  • Singapore

16. Subjects

  • Road Accidents
  • Personal Injury
  • Negligence

17. Areas of Law

  • Tort Law
  • Negligence
  • Road Traffic Law