Anthony Wee

Anthony Wee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 36 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 8 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and negligence. Their track record shows a 30.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Anthony Wee has demonstrated expertise across 107 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	28 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 28 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	28 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 28 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	21 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 21 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	17 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	14 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	12 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	11 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	10 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	9 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	9 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claim	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of future earnings	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal injuries cases	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traffic Accident Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Future Medical Expenses	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Whiplash Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Motor accident	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Traffic Accident	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recusal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accident Reconstruction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Apportionment of Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Standard form contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Actuarial Tables	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Excessive judicial interference	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Third party liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loss of Earning Capacity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Motor Vehicle Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Motor Vehicles (Third-Party Risks and Compensation) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loss of Earnings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inconsiderate Driving	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loss of Dependency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loss of Inheritance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loss of Amenities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Motor Workshop Instructions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vehicle Insurance Policy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Psychiatric Harm	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cervical Spinal Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tetraplegic	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Clinical Depression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Traffic Police Investigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loss of Memory	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loss of Support	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Animal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fatal Accidents Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Appeals	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Apparent bias	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Apportionment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure Obligations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anthony Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Anthony Wee has been affiliated with 8 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 20 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
United Legal Alliance LLC	20 cases	56% of cases	Walker v Soh: Extension of Time for Appeal Application Regarding Dog's Death(May 2021) Hew Chee Chin v Tan Kia Tock: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury(Dec 2020) Wong Siew Mee v Jee Lee: Transfer of Negligence Claim to High Court(May 2020)
Rajah and Tann	5 cases	14% of cases	Muhammad Shaun Eric bin Abdullah v Ng Ah Tee: Assessment of Damages and Causation in Negligence Claim(Sep 2005) Masters v To: Fatal Accident, Dependency Claim, Loss of Inheritance & Support(Jan 2005) Muhammad Shaun Eric v Ng Ah Tee: Causation of Injuries in Negligence Claim(Nov 2004)
Titanium Law Chambers LLC	4 cases	11% of cases	Lee Sim Leng v SMRT Buses Ltd: Personal Injury Claim - Damages Assessment(Jan 2025) Muhammad Adam Lee v Tay Jia Rong Sean: Damages for Personal Injuries(Dec 2021) Ng Li Ning v Ting Jun Heng: Apportionment of Liability in Traffic Accident(Sep 2021)
Rajah & Tann	3 cases	8% of cases	Stork Technology v First Capital: Notice Provision as Condition Precedent in Insurance Policy(Jul 2006) Stafford v Goo Tong Sing: Negligence, Contributory Negligence & Motor Vehicle Accident(May 2006) Mohammad Kassim v Quah Lai Tee: Negligence & Road Accident Liability on Expressway(May 2003)
Cooma Lau & Loh	1 cases	3% of cases	Chua Ah Beng v C & P Holdings: Employee's Fall from Crane & Employer's Liability(May 2001)
Lee Shergill LLP	1 cases	3% of cases	Riaz LLC v Sharil bin Abbas: Mental Capacity, Warrant to Act, and Solicitor's Costs(Sep 2013)
United Legal Alliance	1 cases	3% of cases	Ng Hua Bak v. Eu Kok Thai: Assessment of Damages for Taxi Driver's Accident Injuries(Nov 2016)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	3% of cases	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Application to Set Aside Judgment Based on Judicial Bias(May 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anthony Wee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 6 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	172.7 parties avg	2.7	47%
Neutral	23.0 parties avg	3.0	6%
Partial	62.8 parties avg	2.8	17%
Unknown	14.0 parties avg	4.0	3%
Won	112.6 parties avg	2.6	31%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2005	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2006	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2007	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	42.6 parties avg	2.6
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2021	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anthony Wee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	17(46%)	46%
Neutral	2(5%)	5%
Partial	6(16%)	16%
Unknown	1(3%)	3%
Won	11(30%)	30%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
AUD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
SGD	4,780,462.64	199,185.9424 cases	24

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Unknown: 1 cases (33.3%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 111	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2021	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 36 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Sim Leng v SMRT Buses Ltd: Personal Injury Claim - Damages Assessment 19 Jan 2025 SMRT Buses Ltd (Defendant)Lost	19 Jan 2025	SMRT Buses Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant in the amount of $17,373.16 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Muhammad Adam Lee v Tay Jia Rong Sean: Damages for Personal Injuries 22 Dec 2021 Tay Jia Rong Sean (Defendant)Lost	22 Dec 2021	Tay Jia Rong Sean (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against Defendant; required to pay damages in the amount of $2,186,182.40 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ng Li Ning v Ting Jun Heng: Apportionment of Liability in Traffic Accident 29 Sep 2021 Ng Li Ning (Appellant)Lost	29 Sep 2021	Ng Li Ning (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the apportionment of liability was dismissed. Appellant ordered to pay costs to the respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Teelek Realty Pte Ltd v Ng Tang Hock: Oppression Action & Company Winding Up 21 Jul 2021 Teelek Realty Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	21 Jul 2021	Teelek Realty Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Winding-up order set asideWinding-up order was replaced with a buyout order in accordance with the parties’ agreement. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
5	Walker v Soh: Extension of Time for Appeal Application Regarding Dog's Death 09 May 2021 Soh Poh Geok (Respondent)Neutral	09 May 2021	Soh Poh Geok (Respondent): No order as to costsNo order as to costs.
6	Hew Chee Chin v Tan Kia Tock: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury 17 Dec 2020 Tan Kia Tock (Defendant)Partial	17 Dec 2020	Tan Kia Tock (Defendant): Partial JudgmentPartial judgment against the defendant in the amount of $192,900, along with sums agreed by parties at [4] above (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Wong Siew Mee v Jee Lee: Transfer of Negligence Claim to High Court 26 May 2020 Andy Tan Poh Weng (Third Party)Neutral	26 May 2020	Andy Tan Poh Weng (Third Party): NeutralThe Third Party's position was maintained as the appeal was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Tay Chin Seng v Syahirah bte Sa’ad: Apportionment of Liability in Road Accident 22 Aug 2019 Tay Chin Seng (Appellant)Partial	22 Aug 2019	Tay Chin Seng (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed; Motorcyclist 90% liable and the Driver 10% liable for causing the accident. Costs awarded to the appellant fixed at $2,500 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Chua Peng Ho v Saravanan: Discontinuance of Suit Under Order 21 Rule 2(6) of the Rules of Court 02 May 2017 Chua Peng Ho (Appellant)Lost	02 May 2017	Chua Peng Ho (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Ng Hua Bak v. Eu Kok Thai: Assessment of Damages for Taxi Driver's Accident Injuries 01 Nov 2016 Eu Kok Thai (Defendant)Lost	01 Nov 2016	Eu Kok Thai (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages awarded to the Plaintiff in the amount of $227,165.66 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Asnah Bte Ab Rahman v Li Jianlin: Contributory Negligence & Pedestrian Safety at Signalised Crossings 16 Mar 2016 Asnah Bte Ab Rahman (Appellant)Partial	16 Mar 2016	Asnah Bte Ab Rahman (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; damages reduced by 15% due to contributory negligence. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Lyu Yongqiang v Yu Mau Hing: Negligence in Bus Accident Causing Injury to Cyclist 30 Jul 2015 Yu Mau Hing (Defendant)Lost	30 Jul 2015	Yu Mau Hing (Defendant): Liability ApportionedFound 90% liable for the accident. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Law Kin Ying v Lim Hong Hock: Dependency Claim, Personal Injury, PTSD & Depression 09 Jul 2015 Lim Hong Hock (Defendant)Lost	09 Jul 2015	Lim Hong Hock (Defendant): Judgment against Defendant in partJudgment against Defendant in part for PTSD & Depression, Future medical expenses and Future transport expenses. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Li Jianlin v Asnah bte AB Rahman: Negligence, Pedestrian Safety, and Road Traffic Accident 07 Oct 2014 Asnah Bte Ab Rahman (Defendant)Lost	07 Oct 2014	Asnah Bte Ab Rahman (Defendant): Judgment against the defendantJudgment against the defendant; monetary amount to be determined. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Lai Wai Keong Eugene v Loo Wei Yen: Assessment of Damages for Loss of Future Earnings and Medical Expenses in Personal Injury Case 28 May 2014 Lai Wai Keong Eugene (Appellant)Lost	28 May 2014	Lai Wai Keong Eugene (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; no costs ordered against the appellant.
16	Riaz LLC v Sharil bin Abbas: Mental Capacity, Warrant to Act, and Solicitor's Costs 04 Sep 2013 Sharil bin Abbas (through his deputy and litigation representative, Salbeah bte Paye) (Respondent)Won	04 Sep 2013	Sharil bin Abbas (through his deputy and litigation representative, Salbeah bte Paye) (Respondent): Successful in resisting the appealThe respondent successfully resisted the applicant's appeal against the disallowance of the bill of costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	Lai Wai Keong Eugene v Loo Wei Yen: Negligence Claim for Paraplegic Injuries 27 Jun 2013 Lai Wai Keong Eugene (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	27 Jun 2013	Lai Wai Keong Eugene (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the Assistant Registrar's assessment of damages for loss of future earnings and future medical expenses was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Jaidin bin Jaiman v Loganathan: Res Judicata & Apportionment of Liability in Road Accident Claim 30 Sep 2012 Driver of car bearing license plate number SFA 3400 H (Defendant)Lost	30 Sep 2012	Driver of car bearing license plate number SFA 3400 H (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantInterlocutory Judgment entered against the Defendant with 60% liability. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Lai Wai Keong Eugene v Loo Wei Yen: Damages Assessment for Motorcycle Accident Resulting in Paraplegia 28 Jun 2012 Lai Wai Keong Eugene (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jun 2012	Lai Wai Keong Eugene (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; special damages of $335,399.49 and general damages of $1,738,032.93 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Chan Susan v Lai Tet Chong: Negligence Claim for Bus Accident Dismissed 27 Jun 2012 SBS Transit (Defendant)Won	27 Jun 2012	SBS Transit (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Ter Yin Wei v Lim Leet Fang: Interpretation of Full and Final Settlement Clause in Discharge Voucher 19 Apr 2012 Ter Yin Wei (Appellant, Defendant)Won	19 Apr 2012	Ter Yin Wei (Appellant, Defendant): Judgment for AppellantAppeal allowed; judgment entered for the Appellant. Costs awarded to the Appellant both in this appeal and in the court below (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	Chai Kang Wei Samuel v Shaw Linda Gillian: Road Accident, Damages Assessment, Loss of Future Earnings 26 May 2010 Chai Kang Wei Samuel (Appellant)Partial	26 May 2010	Chai Kang Wei Samuel (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, restoring the AR’s awards for loss of earning capacity and for pain and suffering arising from the head injuries. No monetary amount specified.
23	Shaw Linda Gillian v Chai Kang Wei Samuel: Road Accident Damages Assessment 18 Aug 2009 Chai Kang Wei Samuel (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	18 Aug 2009	Chai Kang Wei Samuel (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partDefendant's appeal to set aside the award for loss of future earnings was dismissed.
24	Ngiam Kong Seng v Lim Chiew Hock: Negligence, Duty of Care & Psychiatric Harm 28 May 2008 Lim Chiew Hock (Respondent)Won	28 May 2008	Lim Chiew Hock (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against him was dismissed.
25	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Application to Set Aside Judgment Based on Judicial Bias 07 May 2007 Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Applicant)Lost	07 May 2007	Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Applicant): Application DismissedOriginating Summons dismissed due to failure to serve the OS on affected parties and lack of jurisdictional foundation.
26	Ngiam Kong Seng v CityCab: Negligence Claim for Tetraplegia After Motorcycle Accident on CTE 20 Mar 2007 Lim Chiew Hock (Defendant)	20 Mar 2007	Lim Chiew Hock (Defendant): -
27	SBS Transit v Stafford: Contributory Negligence in Motorcycle-Bus Collision at Intersection 29 Jan 2007 SBS Transit Ltd (Appellant)Lost	29 Jan 2007	SBS Transit Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	Stork Technology v First Capital: Notice Provision as Condition Precedent in Insurance Policy 02 Jul 2006 First Capital Insurance Ltd (Defendant)Won	02 Jul 2006	First Capital Insurance Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantOriginating Summons dismissed with costs to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
29	Stafford v Goo Tong Sing: Negligence, Contributory Negligence & Motor Vehicle Accident 10 May 2006 Goo Tong Sing (Defendant)Lost	10 May 2006	Goo Tong Sing (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantInterlocutory judgment will be entered against the second defendant, with damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
30	Muhammad Shaun Eric bin Abdullah v Ng Ah Tee: Assessment of Damages and Causation in Negligence Claim 26 Sep 2005 Chua Seng Thye (Third Party)Won	26 Sep 2005	Chua Seng Thye (Third Party): Judgment for Third PartyThe third party was successful in defending the appeal.
31	Masters v To: Fatal Accident, Dependency Claim, Loss of Inheritance & Support 09 Jan 2005 To Keng Lam (alias Toh Jeanette) (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	09 Jan 2005	To Keng Lam (alias Toh Jeanette) (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed in respect of loss of support. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
32	Muhammad Shaun Eric v Ng Ah Tee: Causation of Injuries in Negligence Claim 30 Nov 2004 Chua Seng Thye (Third Party)Partial	30 Nov 2004	Chua Seng Thye (Third Party): Partial JudgmentConsent judgment was entered against the defendant with the plaintiff agreeing to bear 10% of the liability and the third party to indemnity the defendant for 15% of the damages that the defendant has to pay to the plaintiff. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
33	Lassiter v To: Appeal on Damages Assessment & Admissibility of Evidence 25 Mar 2004 To Keng Lam (alias Toh Jeanette) (Respondent)Won	25 Mar 2004	To Keng Lam (alias Toh Jeanette) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with two-thirds costs to the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
34	Masters v To Keng Lam: Appeal of Damages Assessment, Admissibility of Further Evidence 19 Aug 2003 To Keng Lam (alias Toh Jeanette) (Defendant)Won	19 Aug 2003	To Keng Lam (alias Toh Jeanette) (Defendant): Applications dismissed with costsThe defendant successfully opposed the plaintiff's applications to adduce further evidence, and was awarded costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
35	Mohammad Kassim v Quah Lai Tee: Negligence & Road Accident Liability on Expressway 27 May 2003 Chew Kim Teck (Defendant)Lost	27 May 2003	Chew Kim Teck (Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff against the 3rd Defendant, Chew Kim Teck, with damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
36	Chua Ah Beng v C & P Holdings: Employee's Fall from Crane & Employer's Liability 07 May 2001 C & P Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	07 May 2001	C & P Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the Defendant; Plaintiff's claim dismissed.