Toh Buan Eileen v Ho Kiang Fah: Division of Matrimonial Assets After Divorce
In the High Court case of Toh Buan Eileen v Ho Kiang Fah, Judith Prakash J made orders to finalize the distribution of matrimonial property following a divorce. The orders concerned the valuation and sale of properties, including the Sims property, the Aspen Heights property, and the Vistana property, to achieve a 50:50 split of matrimonial assets. The court addressed the husband's non-compliance and made orders to ensure the wife received her share of the assets.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Orders made for the valuation and sale of matrimonial properties to effect a 50:50 distribution of assets.
1.3 Case Type
Family
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
High Court case regarding the division of matrimonial assets after divorce, focusing on property valuation and sale orders. Judgment outlines the distribution of assets.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Toh Buan Eileen | Plaintiff | Individual | Orders made in her favor | Won | |
Ho Kiang Fah | Defendant | Individual | Orders made against him | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Judith Prakash | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Yap Teong Liang | T L Yap & Associates |
4. Facts
- The parties were undergoing divorce proceedings.
- The court had previously ordered a 50:50 distribution of matrimonial assets.
- The matrimonial assets included the Sims property, the Aspen Heights property, and the Vistana property.
- The husband was the sole owner of the Aspen Heights property.
- The Sims and Vistana properties were held in the joint names of the parties.
- The husband did not cooperate with the valuation of the Sims property.
- The Vistana property had been sold by the bank through a public auction.
5. Formal Citations
- Toh Buan Eileen v Ho Kiang Fah, Divorce Transfer No 3914 of 2006 and Summons No 4553 of 2014, [2015] SGHC 12
- Toh Buan Eileen v Ho Kiang Fah, , [2013] SGHC 66
- Toh Buan Eileen v Ho Kiang Fah, , [2014] SGHC 170
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Divorce Transfer filed | |
Interim judgment given | |
First hearing of the ancillary matters | |
Vistana property sold at public auction | |
Second hearing on ancillary matters | |
Judgment dated | |
Appeal heard by the Court of Appeal | |
Hearing held | |
Wife filed an affidavit | |
Husband filed an appeal | |
Grounds of Decision dated | |
Husband applied for a stay of execution | |
Parties appeared before the judge | |
Plaintiff and defendant to file an affidavit | |
Wife filed an affidavit | |
Wife filed an affidavit | |
Husband filed an affidavit | |
Hearing held; orders made | |
Husband filed an appeal | |
Decision Date | |
Husband shall move out on or before |
7. Legal Issues
- Valuation of Matrimonial Assets
- Outcome: The court determined the value of the Sims property at $800,000 and the Aspen Heights property at $1,480,000 based on the evidence provided.
- Category: Substantive
- Distribution of Matrimonial Assets
- Outcome: The court ordered a 50:50 division of the net proceeds from the sale of the Aspen Heights property and directed the husband to pay the wife half of the sale price of the Vistana property.
- Category: Substantive
- Sale of Matrimonial Property
- Outcome: The court ordered the sale of the Sims and Aspen Heights properties, with specific instructions for handling the sales process and distributing the proceeds.
- Category: Procedural
8. Remedies Sought
- Division of Matrimonial Assets
- Sale of Property
9. Cause of Actions
- Divorce
- Ancillary Matters
10. Practice Areas
- Divorce
- Family Law
- Litigation
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Toh Buan Eileen v Ho Kiang Fah | High Court | Yes | [2013] SGHC 66 | Singapore | The judgment provides the general background of the parties and history of the litigation. |
Toh Buan Eileen v Ho Kiang Fah | High Court | Yes | [2014] SGHC 170 | Singapore | The grounds of decision contained the reasons for certain consequential orders that I had made at a hearing on 23 July 2014 |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Matrimonial Assets
- Sims Property
- Aspen Heights Property
- Vistana Property
- Valuation
- Distribution
- Sale Proceeds
15.2 Keywords
- divorce
- matrimonial assets
- property valuation
- property sale
- Singapore
- High Court
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Matrimonial Assets | 98 |
Division of Assets | 98 |
Family Law | 95 |
Divorce | 90 |
Judgments and Orders | 40 |
Costs | 30 |
Real Estate | 30 |
16. Subjects
- Family Law
- Divorce
- Property Law