Ho Kiang Fah

Ho Kiang Fah is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 2 counsels. Through 2 law firms.

Legal Representation

Ho Kiang Fah has been represented by 2 law firms and 2 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ho Kiang Fah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.0
Complex Cases
0 (0.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost62.0 parties avg
Partial12.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201512.0 parties avg
201412.0 parties avg
201312.0 parties avg
201012.0 parties avg
200922.0 parties avg
200812.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ho Kiang Fah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost6(85.7%)
Partial1(14.3%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD285,242.476 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20151
1
20141
1
20131
1
20101
1
20091
2
20081
1

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
18 Jan 2015
DefendantLostOrders made for the valuation and sale of matrimonial properties to effect a 50:50 distribution of assets. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
28 Aug 2014
DefendantLostHusband's jurisdictional objections dismissed.
20 Mar 2013
DefendantPartialMatrimonial assets to be divided equally between the parties. Subject to payment of the wife of all amounts due to her pursuant to this judgment, the husband shall be entitled to retain the cash, shares and other assets currently held in his sole name. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
22 Nov 2010
AppellantLostAppeal dismissed with costs of $3,500 to the wife (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
09 Mar 2009
Plaintiff, AppellantLostPlaintiff's action was struck out as an abuse of process. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
15 Jan 2009
AppellantLostAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondent, fixed at $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28 Feb 2008
Defendant, AppellantLostHusband's appeal was dismissed; each party to bear its own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.