I-Admin v Hong Ying Ting: Copyright Breach & Confidential Information Misuse

I-Admin (Singapore) Pte Ltd sued Hong Ying Ting and others in the High Court of Singapore, alleging breach of copyright and misuse of confidential information. I-Admin claimed the defendants, former employees and a related company, wrongfully accessed and used its software systems and client data. The court, presided over by Choo Han Teck J, dismissed I-Admin's application to provide disclosed materials to the police, finding no exceptional circumstances to justify the release of such information.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Application dismissed with costs reserved to the trial judge.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

I-Admin sues Hong Ying Ting for copyright breach and misuse of confidential client data. The court dismissed I-Admin's application to share disclosed materials with the police.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiff provides computerised payroll management services.
  2. The first and second defendants were formerly employed by the plaintiff.
  3. The first and second defendants resigned in 2011.
  4. The first and second defendants were appointed as directors of the third defendant in September 2012.
  5. The third defendant provides similar services as the plaintiff.
  6. The plaintiff claims the defendants breached its copyright in software systems.
  7. The plaintiff alleges the defendants accessed and downloaded confidential client data.

5. Formal Citations

  1. I-Admin (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Hong Ying Ting and others, Suit No 585 of 2013 (Summons No 728 of 2015), [2015] SGHC 153

6. Timeline

DateEvent
First defendant resigned
Second defendant resigned
First defendant appointed as a director of the third defendant
Second defendant appointed as a director of the third defendant
Defendants' previous police report
Summons No 728 of 2015 filed
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Copyright
    • Outcome: The court did not make a ruling on the breach of copyright itself, but rather on whether the plaintiff could share disclosed materials with the police.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Misuse of Confidential Information
    • Outcome: The court did not make a ruling on the misuse of confidential information itself, but rather on whether the plaintiff could share disclosed materials with the police.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Disclosure of Information
    • Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's application to disclose extracted information to the police.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Injunction
  2. Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Copyright
  • Breach of Contract
  • Misuse of Confidential Information

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Intellectual Property Litigation

11. Industries

  • Technology
  • Banking

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • ePayroll
  • PayAdmin
  • Confidential Information
  • Anton Piller Order
  • Confidentiality Club
  • Payroll Management
  • Computerised Services

15.2 Keywords

  • Copyright
  • Confidential Information
  • Payroll
  • Singapore
  • High Court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Copyright Dispute
  • Confidentiality
  • Civil Procedure