Others

Others is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 26 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 71 counsels. Through 29 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 11.5% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Others has been represented by 29 law firms and 71 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
WongPartnership LLP	1 case	Tan Chee Meng SC Tan Chee Meng Joel Chng Chang Man Phing Sim Bock Eng Lim Ke Xiu Chloe Lee Yong Shu Hsien
Rodyk & Davidson	1 case	Low Chai Chong Lim Jun Hao Alvin
Advocatus Law LLP	1 case	Kenneth Pereira
Eldan Law LLP	2 cases	Wong Tjen Wee Wong Siew Hong Senthil Dayalan Lawrence Tan Gavin Foo Foo Juyuan
JLC Advisors LLP	2 cases	Sim Chong Loo Chieh Ling Kate Khoo Ching Shin Shem Kate Loo Huang Haogen
Drew & Napier	1 case	Cavinder Bull Davinder Singh Davinder Singh SC
Premier Law LLC	2 cases	Siraj Omar Premalatha Silwaraju Prema Latha
Lee Bon Leong & Co	1 case	Jeffrey Beh
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 case	Lok Vi Ming Audrey Chiang Ju Hua Calvin Lim
Allen & Gledhill	1 case	Eugene Thuraisingam Ashok Kumar
Khattar Wong & Partners	1 case	Teo Weng Kie Kanita Mahendran
Allen and Gledhill	1 case	Kenny Yap Leona Wong
Rajah & Tann	1 case	Dominic Chan Andre Yeap Dawn Tan
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Adrian Tan Gim Hai Kelvin Tan Suresh Divyanathan Aaron Kok Ther Chien
Tan Jin Hwee, Eunice & Lim Choo Eng	1 case	Tan Cheng Han Benjamin Leong
MPillay	1 case	Melissa Heng Li Ya
LVM Law Chambers LLC	1 case	Yong Tian Wei Jason
RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP	1 case	Nandakumar Renganathan Simren Kaur
Oliver Quek & Associates	1 case	Oliver Quek
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Chandra Mohan Gillian Hauw
Phang & Co	1 case	Michael Hwang Phang Sin Kat
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 case	Stanley Lai Clara Tung Yi Lin Gloria Goh En-Ci
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 case	Michael Chia Kannan Ramesh Karam Parmar
Rajah and Tann	1 case	Jainil Bhandari
Harry Elias Partnership	1 case	Philip Fong K S Rajah
Haq and Selvam	1 case	Wendy Tan Michael Lai
Tan Jin Hwee LLC	1 case	Gopinath S/O Pillai Tan Kian Hong Aloysius
M Rama Law Corporation	1 case	Shirley Lim
William Lai & Alan Wong	1 case	Alan Wong Hoi Ping

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Others's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 3 (11.5%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	73.0 parties avg	3.0	26.9%
Neutral	45.0 parties avg	5.0	15.4%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	7.7%
Won	133.1 parties avg	3.1	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	53.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	53.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2001	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2000	34.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Others's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(26.9%)	26.9%
Neutral	4(15.4%)	15.4%
Partial	2(7.7%)	7.7%
Won	13(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	163,860.83	14,896.4411 cases	11

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2014	2 32	Lost: 3 cases (150.0%) Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2010	4 1112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2000	2 12	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 26 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2021-sghc-69 22 Mar 2021	22 Mar 2021	Defendant	WonThe defendant's application for a stay of the suit pending arbitration was granted.
2	2015-sghc-153 10 Jun 2015	10 Jun 2015	Defendant	WonApplication by the plaintiff to provide the police with a copy of the defendants’ disclosed materials was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2015-sghc-96 12 Apr 2015	12 Apr 2015	Defendant	WonDefendant's application to vary the Mareva injunction was allowed.
4	2014-sghc-244 20 Nov 2014	20 Nov 2014	Defendant	LostFreezing order granted against the defendant.
5	2014-sghc-209 22 Oct 2014	22 Oct 2014	Defendant, Respondent	LostApplication to set aside service of action allowed by AR, appeal allowed with costs to the plaintiffs to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2014-sghcr-13 01 Jul 2014	01 Jul 2014	Defendant	WonCosts of compliance with the order for a re-tender of the 1,903 drawings in the native format, including all associated disbursements incurred in so complying, shall be borne by the plaintiff on an indemnity basis. Costs of the application awarded to the fifth defendants which I fix at $4,000 and additionally, all disbursements reasonably incurred. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	2014-sghcr-8 15 Apr 2014	15 Apr 2014	Defendant	WonPlaintiff's application for summary judgment was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	2014-sghc-36 24 Feb 2014	24 Feb 2014	Defendant	LostThe defendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's claim for the upkeep of the child was unsuccessful, and the claim was directed to proceed to trial.
9	2013-sghc-47 24 Feb 2013	24 Feb 2013	Defendant	LostThe court struck out the defendant's defence. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	2012-sghc-193 24 Sep 2012	24 Sep 2012	Plaintiff	WonAwarded $70,000 as general damages and $35,000 as aggravated damages (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	2012-sghc-32 09 Feb 2012	09 Feb 2012	Defendant	LostDefendants to remove the caveat lodged against the property at 82 Cove Drive.
12	2011-sghc-203 13 Sep 2011	13 Sep 2011	Defendant	PartialFirst week of trial dates vacated; new directions issued with 'unless' orders.
13	2011-sghc-180 28 Jul 2011	28 Jul 2011	Defendant	NeutralThe 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants did not enter an appearance in the action, and were not involved in the proceedings at trial.
14	2011-sghc-76 30 Mar 2011	30 Mar 2011	Defendant	LostDamages assessed at 10% against the second and third defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	2010-sgca-35 23 Sep 2010	23 Sep 2010	Respondent	NeutralThe rest of the Order of Court was to stand.
16	2010-sghc-110 11 Apr 2010	11 Apr 2010	Defendant, Respondent	WonStay of proceedings granted on the ground of forum non conveniens. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	2010-sghc-101 31 Mar 2010	31 Mar 2010	Respondent	LostAcquittal set aside; matter remitted to trial judge for conviction and sentencing.
18	2010-sghc-60 18 Feb 2010	18 Feb 2010	Respondent, Claimant	WonJudgment for Respondent; the appeal was dismissed and the original Small Claims Tribunal decision was upheld. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	2010-sghc-15 13 Jan 2010	13 Jan 2010	Defendant	PartialAppeal against the order allowing the amendment of the statement of claim was dismissed. Appeal against the order for further discovery was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	2007-sghc-174 10 Oct 2007	10 Oct 2007	Second Intervener	NeutralThe intervener's position was noted but no specific outcome was assigned.
21	2005-sgca-6 25 Jan 2005	25 Jan 2005	Respondent	WonSuccessfully resisted the appeal against the interim order.
22	2001-sghc-297 04 Oct 2001	04 Oct 2001	Defendant	WonThe application against the defendant was dismissed.
23	2001-sghc-227 16 Aug 2001	16 Aug 2001	Respondent	WonThe respondents successfully defended the appeal.
24	2000-sghc-265 04 Dec 2000	04 Dec 2000	Defendant	NeutralThe trial continued against the third defendants.
25	2000-sgca-40 07 Aug 2000	07 Aug 2000	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed in favor of the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
26	2000-sghc-17 30 Jan 2000	30 Jan 2000	Defendant, Respondent	WonJudgment in favour of the defendant. The plaintiff was ordered to pay the first and third defendants $10,000 in costs for the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.