Pittis Stavros v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Breach of Trust in Marine Fuel Oil 'Buy-Back' Scheme

In Pittis Stavros v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal against conviction and sentence for criminal breach of trust. Pittis Stavros, the chief engineer of MV Sakura Princess, was charged with dishonestly misappropriating marine fuel oil by engaging in a 'buy-back' scheme. The District Judge convicted him and sentenced him to 18 months' imprisonment. The High Court allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the conviction under Section 408 of the Penal Code and substituting it with a conviction under Section 406, and reducing the sentence to 14 months' imprisonment.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Allowed in Part

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Pittis Stavros, chief engineer, was convicted of criminal breach of trust for his role in a marine fuel oil 'buy-back' scheme. The High Court allowed the appeal in part.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyPartial LossPartial
Sanjiv Vaswani of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Pittis StavrosAppellantIndividualAppeal allowed in partPartial

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
See Kee OonJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The appellant was the chief engineer of the MV Sakura Princess.
  2. V8 Pool Inc. chartered the Vessel under a time charter.
  3. Costank Singapore Pte Ltd was to supply the Vessel with 1,800 MT of MFO.
  4. The appellant was charged with criminal breach of trust for misappropriating MFO.
  5. The prosecution alleged the appellant initiated a scheme to short-supply MFO.
  6. The appellant denied being part of any buy-back or short-supply arrangement.
  7. The High Court found that there had been a short-supply scheme and that the appellant had participated in it.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Pittis Stavros v Public Prosecutor, Magistrate's Appeal No 82 of 2014, [2015] SGHC 67

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Voyage commenced from Nikiski in Alaska
Vessel entered Singapore waters
Bunker barge deployed to supply the Vessel with 500 MT of MFO
Bunkering commenced
Officers from the Maritime Port Authority and the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau came on board the Vessel and took a number of its occupants into custody
District Judge’s grounds of decision published as Public Prosecutor v Pittis Stavros [2014] SGDC 371
Magistrate's Appeal No 82 of 2014
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Criminal Breach of Trust
    • Outcome: The High Court found that the appellant was guilty of CBT simpliciter as defined by s 405 of the Penal Code.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2002] 2 SLR(R) 821
  2. Entrustment of Dominion over Property
    • Outcome: The High Court held that the appellant had been entrusted by V8 Pool with dominion over the misappropriated 200 MT of MFO.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2002] 2 SLR(R) 821
  3. Definition of 'Servant' under Section 408 of the Penal Code
    • Outcome: The High Court found that the appellant was not a servant of V8 Pool.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • (1873) LR 2 CCR 34
  4. Sentencing for Criminal Breach of Trust
    • Outcome: The High Court reduced the sentence to 14 months' imprisonment.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Related Cases:
      • [2012] 3 SLR 776
      • [2014] 4 SLR 892

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against conviction
  2. Appeal against sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Criminal Breach of Trust

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • Shipping
  • Maritime

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Public Prosecutor v Pittis StavrosDistrict CourtYes[2014] SGDC 371SingaporeCited as the District Judge's grounds of decision in the case.
Hon Chi Wan Colman v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2002] 2 SLR(R) 821SingaporeCited for the principle that the question of whether a person has dominion over property is a matter of the degree of control exercised by the person over the property.
The Queen v NegusCourt of Crown Cases ReservedYes(1873) LR 2 CCR 34EnglandCited by the respondent for the proposition that the test of whether the accused was a servant was whether he is 'under the control and bound to obey the orders of his master'.
Ong Chee Eng v PPHigh CourtYes[2012] 3 SLR 776SingaporeCited for the observation that where Parliament has enacted a range of possible sentences, it is the duty of the court to ensure that the full spectrum is carefully explored in determining the appropriate sentence.
Poh Boon Kiat v PPHigh CourtYes[2014] 4 SLR 892SingaporeCited with approval of Ong Chee Eng v PP [2012] 3 SLR 776 at [24].
Angliss Singapore Pte Ltd v PPHigh CourtYes[2006] 4 SLR(R) 653SingaporeCited for the statutory maximum sentence signals the gravity with which Parliament views any individual offence and that the sentencing judge ought to note the maximum penalty imposed and then apply his mind to determine precisely where the offender’s conduct falls within the entire range of punishment devised by Parliament.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 408Singapore
Penal Code s 405Singapore
Penal Code s 406Singapore
Penal Code s 403Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Marine Fuel Oil
  • Buy-back scheme
  • Short-supply arrangement
  • Criminal breach of trust
  • Time charter
  • Bunker barge
  • Bunker surveyor
  • Opening sounding
  • Closing sounding

15.2 Keywords

  • Criminal breach of trust
  • Marine fuel oil
  • Short supply
  • Shipping
  • Singapore
  • Penal Code

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Shipping Law
  • Commercial Crime