ARV v ARW: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance Dispute in Divorce Proceedings

In ARV v ARW, before the High Court of Singapore on March 16, 2015, the court addressed the division of matrimonial assets and maintenance for the Wife and their three children following divorce proceedings. The court drew an adverse inference against the Husband for failing to provide full disclosure of his assets, leading to a rough allocation of assets favoring the Wife. The Wife was awarded the Matrimonial Home, the Second Apartment, the Chongqing Apartment, and an interest in [F] Company. The court declined to award maintenance to the Wife but granted the requested maintenance for the children.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Division of assets ordered in favor of the Wife; maintenance for the Wife declined; maintenance of the children awarded as sought.

1.3 Case Type

Family

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore High Court addresses division of matrimonial assets and maintenance for wife and children in ARV v ARW divorce case, drawing adverse inference against husband.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
ARWDefendantCorporationAssets division againstLost
ARVPlaintiffIndividualAssets awarded as soughtWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Aedit AbdullahJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The parties were married in 1992 and divorce proceedings commenced in 2011.
  2. The Wife sought division of matrimonial assets and maintenance for herself and three children.
  3. The Husband failed to give full and frank disclosure of his assets, particularly regarding companies and trusts.
  4. The Wife contended that the Husband had not given full disclosure of assets.
  5. The Husband claimed several assets had low or negligible value.
  6. The Wife sought specific assets, including two Singapore apartments, one China apartment, and a company.
  7. The Husband proposed holding the First and Second Apartments until an en-bloc sale.

5. Formal Citations

  1. ARV v ARW, , [2015] SGHC 72

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Parties were married.
Divorce proceedings commenced.
Interim judgment was given.
Judgment reserved.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Division of Matrimonial Assets
    • Outcome: The court ordered a division of assets, awarding the Wife the Matrimonial Home, the Second Apartment, the Chongqing Apartment, and the interest in [F] Company, drawing an adverse inference against the Husband for non-disclosure.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Non-disclosure of assets
      • Valuation of assets
      • Direct and indirect contributions
  2. Maintenance for Wife
    • Outcome: The court declined to award maintenance to the Wife, considering the distribution of property and the uncertain means of the Husband.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Maintenance for Children
    • Outcome: The court ordered the Husband to pay $7,050 per month for the maintenance of the three children and to bear the costs of their tertiary studies.
    • Category: Substantive
  4. Adverse Inference for Non-Disclosure
    • Outcome: The court drew an adverse inference against the Husband due to his failure to provide full and frank disclosure of his assets.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Division of Matrimonial Assets
  2. Maintenance for Wife
  3. Maintenance for Children

9. Cause of Actions

  • Divorce
  • Division of Matrimonial Assets
  • Claim for Maintenance

10. Practice Areas

  • Family Litigation
  • Divorce
  • Matrimonial Asset Disputes

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
BCB v BCCCourt of AppealYes[2013] 2 SLR 324SingaporeCited for the broad-brush approach in division of property under s 112 of the Women’s Charter, taking into account both direct and indirect contributions.
NK v NLUnknownYes[2007] 3 SLR(R) 743SingaporeCited for the methodologies in division of matrimonial property, including identification of assets and determination of a just division.
Koh Bee Choo v Choo Chai HuahCourt of AppealYes[2007] SGCA 21SingaporeCited for the requirements to draw an adverse inference against a party for failure to disclose assets.
Yeo Chong Lin v Tay Ang Choo Nancy and another appealUnknownYes[2011] 2 SLR 1157SingaporeCited for the principle that a higher proportion of known assets may be given where full disclosure has not been given.
ANZ v AOAHigh CourtYes[2014] SGHC 243SingaporeCited for the presumption that any gift to the husband would be a gift to the parties equally.
Wan Lai Cheng v Quek Seow Kee and another appeal and another matterUnknownYes[2012] 4 SLR 405SingaporeCited in relation to the formula applied in maintenance cases.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Women’s Charter (Cap 353, 2009 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Matrimonial Assets
  • Maintenance
  • Adverse Inference
  • Full and Frank Disclosure
  • Broad-Brush Approach
  • Questionable Assets
  • Trusts
  • Companies
  • Litigant-in-Person

15.2 Keywords

  • divorce
  • matrimonial assets
  • maintenance
  • Singapore
  • family law
  • adverse inference
  • non-disclosure

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Asset Division
  • Maintenance