UOB v Loh Boon Hua: Mortgagee's Right to Rent After Mortgagor's Bankruptcy and Advance Rent Payment

In United Overseas Bank Ltd v Loh Boon Hua, the High Court of Singapore addressed whether a mortgagee, United Overseas Bank Ltd, could demand rent from a tenant, Mdm Ding Yilian, after the mortgagor, Mr. Loh Boon Hua, became bankrupt and had already received rent in advance. The court ruled that the mortgagee was only entitled to vacant possession of the property after the existing lease expired, as the tenant had already paid rent in advance to the mortgagor.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Mortgagee shall be entitled to enter into vacant possession of the Property starting from 1 August 2015, 12pm.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

UOB seeks vacant possession of mortgaged property. Court considers mortgagee's right to rent after mortgagor's bankruptcy and advance rent payment to tenant.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
United Overseas Bank LtdPlaintiffCorporationPartialPartial
Loh Boon HuaDefendantIndividualLostLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Colin SeowAssistant RegistrarYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Ng Yeow KhoonKhattarWong LLP

4. Facts

  1. Mr Loh Boon Hua mortgaged his property to United Overseas Bank Ltd.
  2. The property was leased to Mdm Ding Yilian under a tenancy agreement.
  3. The tenancy agreement stipulated monthly rent payments from August 1, 2013, to July 31, 2015.
  4. Mr Loh Boon Hua became bankrupt on June 26, 2014.
  5. UOB sought vacant possession of the property.
  6. The tenant had paid rent in advance to the mortgagor.
  7. The mortgagee's security interest in the Property should strictly be subject to the exact terms set out in the tenancy agreement.

5. Formal Citations

  1. United Overseas Bank Ltd v Loh Boon Hua, Originating Summons No 1193 of 2014, [2015] SGHCR 9

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Tenancy agreement signed between Mr Loh Boon Hua and Mdm Ding Yilian.
Mortgage granted to United Overseas Bank Limited.
Mr Loh Boon Hua declared bankrupt.
Letter of demand issued by Mortgagee's solicitors.
Notices issued to Mortgagor and Occupiers to deliver possession.
Notice for possession of the Property delivered to the Tenant.
Notice for possession of the Property delivered to the Tenant.
Mortgage action commenced.
First hearing of the mortgage action.
Second hearing of the mortgage action.
Third hearing of the mortgage action.
Hearing proceeded.
Decision Date
Mortgagee shall be entitled to enter into vacant possession of the Property.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Mortgagee's Right to Possession
    • Outcome: The court held that the mortgagee was only entitled to vacant possession after the lease expired.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • (1779) Doug KB 279
      • [1950] Ch 134
      • (1881) 18 Ch D 229
      • (1882) 19 Ch D 539
      • [1971-1973] SLR(R) 511
  2. Mortgagee's Right to Rent
    • Outcome: The court held that the mortgagee was not entitled to demand further rent from the tenant who had already paid rent in advance to the mortgagor.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • (1779) Doug KB 279
      • (1882) 19 Ch D 539

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Delivery of vacant possession of the Property to the Mortgagee

9. Cause of Actions

  • Mortgage Action
  • Claim for Possession

10. Practice Areas

  • Mortgage Actions
  • Real Estate Litigation

11. Industries

  • Banking
  • Real Estate

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Moss v GallimoreKing's BenchYes(1779) Doug KB 279EnglandCited regarding a mortgagee's entitlement to rent after giving notice to a tenant, but distinguished as the present case involves rent paid in advance.
Kitchen’s Trustee v Madders and AnotherChancery DivisionYes[1950] Ch 134EnglandCited to support that Moss v Gallimore remained good law in England.
Mohamed Said bin Ali and others v Ka Wah BankCourt of AppealYes[1989] 1 SLR(R) 689SingaporeCited regarding joining a party to the action as a co-defendant.
Harlock v AshberryHigh CourtYes(1881) 18 Ch D 229EnglandCited regarding the treatment to be accorded to receipts of rent.
Harlock v AshberryCourt of AppealYes(1882) 19 Ch D 539EnglandCited regarding the treatment to be accorded to receipts of rent and endorsed by the Singapore Court of Appeal.
Tan Hin Choon and others v Ban Hin Lee Bank LtdSingapore Court of AppealYes[1971-1973] SLR(R) 511SingaporeEndorsed and applied Jessel MR’s and Brett LJ’s judicial opinions in Harlock v Ashberry (CA).
Cockburn v EdwardsCourt of AppealYes(1881) 18 Ch D 449EnglandCited for the same effect as Jessel MR’s holding.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Order 83 of the Rules of Court (R 5, 2006 Rev Ed)
O 83 r 1 of the ROC

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Land Titles Act (Cap 157, 2004 Rev Ed)Singapore
Land Titles Act (Cap 157, 2004 Rev Ed) section 75(2)Singapore
Conveyancing and Law of Property Act (Cap 61, 1994 Rev Ed)Singapore
Conveyancing and Law of Property Act (Cap 61, 1994 Rev Ed) section 24Singapore
Land Titles Act (Cap 157, 2004 Rev Ed) section 69(1)Singapore
Conveyancing and Law of Property Act (Cap 61, 1994 Rev Ed) section 29Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Mortgage
  • Mortgagee
  • Mortgagor
  • Tenancy Agreement
  • Vacant Possession
  • Rent in Advance
  • Bankruptcy

15.2 Keywords

  • mortgage
  • bankruptcy
  • rent
  • possession
  • tenancy

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Mortgages
  • Landlord and Tenant
  • Bankruptcy