United Overseas Bank Ltd

United Overseas Bank Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 32 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 45 counsels. Through 13 law firms. Their track record shows a 43.8% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 8 complex cases, representing 25.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

United Overseas Bank Ltd has been represented by 13 law firms and 45 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 case	Lee Eng Beng Chew Ming Hsien Rebecca Cheong Tian Ci Torsten Ang Siok Hoon
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Lee Eng Beng Lynette Koh Lionel Tay Ng Pei Jing Esme Wei
Drew & Napier LLC	4 cases	Tham Feei Sy Mohan Gopalan Hri Kumar Nair Hri Kumar Nair SC Hri Kumar
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 case	Keith Tnee Ang Wee Tiong Leonard Loh Pang Hui Min Siaw Hui Eddee Ng Geraint Kang Sherlene Goh Cheryl Nah Kannan Ramesh Jasmine Foong Shu Jun Jasmine Foong Kanyakumari d/o Veerasamy Kanan Ramesh
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	1 case	Ng Yeow Khoon Ho Wei Liang Sherman
KhattarWong LLP	1 case	Ng Yeow Khoon
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	Wong Pei Ting Kenneth Lim
TSMP Law Corporation	1 case	Thio Shen Yi Karen Teo Angela Thiang
Wong Partnership	2 cases	Alvin Yeo Sim Bock Eng Sannie Sng Sng Sannie
Khattar Wong and Partners	1 case	Chan Kia Pheng Ang Keng Ling
Yeo-Leong and Peh LLC	1 case	Kenny Chooi David Kong Kelvin Fong
M/s Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 case	Kannan Ramesh Cheryl Koh
Tan Kok Quan Partners	1 case	Seetha Ramasamy

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of United Overseas Bank Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 8 (25.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	3.1%
Lost	92.9 parties avg	2.9	28.1%
Neutral	54.8 parties avg	4.8	15.6%
Partial	33.0 parties avg	3.0	9.4%
Won	143.4 parties avg	3.4	43.8%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	116.0 parties avg	16.0
2021	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2018	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	52.4 parties avg	2.4
2009	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	52.6 parties avg	2.6
2005	52.8 parties avg	2.8
2003	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of United Overseas Bank Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(3.1%)	3.1%
Lost	9(28.1%)	28.1%
Neutral	5(15.6%)	15.6%
Partial	3(9.4%)	9.4%
Won	14(43.8%)	43.8%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,308,657.88	135,803.4017 cases	17

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2018	1 2	Neutral: 2 cases (200.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	2 14	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 4 cases (200.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	3 113	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 32	Lost: 3 cases (150.0%) Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 32 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sghc-43 23 Feb 2023	23 Feb 2023	Other	WonOpposed the JM Applications.
2	2021-sghca-6 22 Aug 2021	22 Aug 2021	Respondent, Defendant	WonAppeal upheld; Poh Chiak Ow to pay United Overseas Bank Ltd $40,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2021-sgca-78 09 Aug 2021	09 Aug 2021	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed; UOB can proceed with Singapore proceedings.
4	2018-sghc-211 30 Sep 2018	30 Sep 2018	Other	NeutralUnited Overseas Bank Ltd was the Security Agent for United Overseas Bank Ltd, the Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, Bank of America, NA and UniCredit Bank AG.
5	2018-sghc-180 15 Aug 2018	15 Aug 2018	Other	NeutralUOB submitted a proof of debt to the Judicial Managers based on the corporate guarantees executed by SHL.
6	2017-sghc-27 13 Feb 2017	13 Feb 2017	Defendant	PartialUOB to pay interest at 5.33% per annum on the interim payment amount from 16 July 2008 to 2 February 2010. UOB was awarded costs on a standard basis from 3 February 2010 to 19 December 2012 and on an indemnity basis from 20 December 2012 to date.
7	2016-sghc-285 27 Dec 2016	27 Dec 2016	Defendant	NeutralNo further award on the Plaintiff’s claim against United Overseas Bank Ltd as the interim payment already satisfied the liability (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	2015-sghc-266 19 Oct 2015	19 Oct 2015	Respondent	WonAppeal allowed; the Debtor was ordered to pay the Bank costs of the appeal fixed at $8,000 plus reasonable disbursements. The costs were fixed on an indemnity basis which the Bank was entitled to under the Guarantees. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	2015-sghcr-9 13 Apr 2015	13 Apr 2015	Plaintiff	PartialMortgagee shall be entitled to enter into vacant possession of the Property starting from 1 August 2015, 12pm. Costs fixed in the sum of $6,500 (all in) which was to be added to the amount described in [36(c)] above and to be satisfied out of the available proceeds from the sale of the Property. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	2012-sghc-56 15 Mar 2012	15 Mar 2012	Applicant	NeutralUOB was granted interpleader relief and ordered to pay the balance sale proceeds into Court. The bank's solicitor's attendance at future hearings was dispensed with.
11	2011-sghc-268 19 Dec 2011	19 Dec 2011	Defendant	LostAccount of profits ordered against United Overseas Bank Limited.
12	2011-sghc-234 26 Oct 2011	26 Oct 2011	Defendant	NeutralThe bank adopted the same position as the plaintiff.
13	2010-sghc-363 16 Dec 2010	16 Dec 2010	Plaintiff, Respondent	WonAppeal allowed against the decision to dismiss the application for summary judgement. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	2010-sgca-9 02 Mar 2010	02 Mar 2010	Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed; UOB to pay Main-Line $1,962,424.30 as interim payment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	2010-sghc-43 04 Feb 2010	04 Feb 2010	Defendant, Respondent	WonThe defendant's statutory demand was upheld as the plaintiff's appeal was dismissed.
16	2010-sghc-42 04 Feb 2010	04 Feb 2010	Respondent	WonThe appeal against the Assistant Registrar’s dismissal of the plaintiff’s application to set aside the defendant’s statutory demand was dismissed.
17	2010-sghc-41 04 Feb 2010	04 Feb 2010	Defendant, Respondent	WonThe defendant's statutory demand was upheld as the appeal was dismissed.
18	2009-sghc-232 15 Oct 2009	15 Oct 2009	Defendant, Respondent	LostThe appeal against the decision to allow Main-Line to elect an account of profits was dismissed.
19	2009-sghc-212 22 Sep 2009	22 Sep 2009	Defendant, Respondent	WonDefendant's appeal against the order for interim payment was allowed.
20	2008-sghc-55 09 Apr 2008	09 Apr 2008	Defendant	DismissedApplication for further discovery against the first defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	2006-sghc-233 20 Dec 2006	20 Dec 2006	Defendant	LostThe defendant's counterclaim for invalidating the patent was dismissed.
22	2006-sghc-205 22 Nov 2006	22 Nov 2006	Defendant	PartialPartial loss; ordered to transfer interest in unit upon payment of specified amount.
23	2006-sgca-30 24 Sep 2006	24 Sep 2006	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed with costs and the usual consequential orders. Order for costs against the respondent rescinded.
24	2006-sghc-87 24 May 2006	24 May 2006	Plaintiff	WonDeclaration acknowledging its prior right to conduct the sale of the mortgaged property granted. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
25	2006-sghc-80 15 May 2006	15 May 2006	Defendant	WonJudgment in favour of UOB; entitled to $128,499.69 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26	2005-sgca-46 27 Sep 2005	27 Sep 2005	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed with costs.
27	2005-sghc-113 29 Jun 2005	29 Jun 2005	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
28	2005-sghc-112 23 Jun 2005	23 Jun 2005	Respondent	WonApplication dismissed with costs fixed at $750 each for the two creditors which had appeared at the hearing to oppose the application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
29	2005-sghc-68 13 Apr 2005	13 Apr 2005	Defendant, Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed.
30	2005-sghc-50 09 Mar 2005	09 Mar 2005	Petitioner	WonThe petitioner's application for the respondent to be wound up was granted.
31	2003-sghc-256 21 Oct 2003	21 Oct 2003	Appellant, Judgment Creditor	LostAppeal dismissed; the court ruled that wages or salary is exempted from garnishment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
32	2003-sghc-170 06 Aug 2003	06 Aug 2003	Appellant	LostThe appeal against the dismissal of the bankruptcy petition was dismissed.