Re Opti-Medix Ltd: Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceedings for Companies Incorporated Outside Jurisdiction

The High Court of Singapore, in Re Opti-Medix Ltd, granted an application by Masaaki Sawano, the Bankruptcy Trustee appointed by the Tokyo District Court of Japan, to recognize the foreign insolvency proceedings for Opti-Medix Limited and Medical Trend Limited, both incorporated in the British Virgin Islands. The court, presided over by Aedit Abdullah JC, considered the location of the companies' primary business operations in Japan and the protection of Singapore creditors in making its decision. The court ultimately recognized the bankruptcy orders of the Tokyo District Court and the appointment of the Applicant as the Bankruptcy Trustee of the Companies.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Recognition of the bankruptcy orders of the Tokyo District Court and of the appointment of the Applicant as the Bankruptcy Trustee of the Companies granted.

1.3 Case Type

Insolvency

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore court recognizes Tokyo District Court's bankruptcy orders for Opti-Medix Ltd, emphasizing the center of main interest (COMI) test.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
MASAAKI SAWANOApplicantIndividualApplication GrantedWonStephanie Yeo Xiu Wen
OPTI-MEDIX LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)RespondentCorporationOrders GrantedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Aedit AbdullahJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Stephanie Yeo Xiu WenWongPartnership LLP

4. Facts

  1. The Companies were incorporated in the British Virgin Islands.
  2. The Companies' main business was factoring receivables from medical institutions in Japan.
  3. The factoring was funded by non-recourse notes issued by the Companies.
  4. The Securities and Surveillance Commission of Japan suspended the issuing of new notes by the Companies in 2015.
  5. Bankruptcy orders were granted by the Tokyo District Court on 13 November 2015.
  6. The Applicant was appointed as the Bankruptcy Trustee of the Companies.
  7. The Companies held balance monies in various Singapore bank accounts.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Re Opti-Medix Ltd (in liquidation) and another matter, , [2016] SGHC 108

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Bankruptcy orders granted by the Tokyo District Court
Hearing date
Judgment date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceedings
    • Outcome: The court granted recognition of the bankruptcy orders of the Tokyo District Court and of the appointment of the Applicant as the Bankruptcy Trustee of the Companies.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2014] 2 SLR 815
      • [1958] 2 MC 81
  2. Centre of Main Interest (COMI)
    • Outcome: The court considered the COMI of the companies to be Japan, which supported the recognition of the Japanese bankruptcy orders.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2008] 1 WLR 852

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings
  2. Appointment of a foreign bankruptcy trustee

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Insolvency Law
  • Cross Border Insolvency

11. Industries

  • Finance
  • Healthcare

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Beluga Chartering GmbH (in liquidation) and others v Beluga Projects (Singapore) Pte Ltd (in liquidation) and another (Deugro (Singapore) Pte Ltd, non-party)Court of AppealYes[2014] 2 SLR 815SingaporeCited for the principle that a foreign liquidator will be recognised as the representative of the company and their claims will generally be accepted.
Re Lee Wah Bank LtdN/AYes[1958] 2 MC 81SingaporeCited as an example of Singapore courts recognizing a liquidator appointed by a jurisdiction other than the place of incorporation.
Re Russo-Asiatic BankN/AYes[1929] HKCU 8Hong KongCited in support of the argument that the Singapore court should recognise the appointment of the Applicant-Trustee even though he was not a liquidator appointed in the place of incorporation of the Companies.
Re HIH Casualty and General Insurance LtdN/AYes[2008] 1 WLR 852N/ACited for the proposition that the centre of main interest (COMI) test can be a basis for the recognition at common law of foreign insolvency proceedings.
Rubin v Eurofinance SAN/AYes[2013] 1 AC 236N/ACited for the proposition that the introduction of judge-made law extending the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments would be only to the detriment of United Kingdom businesses without any corresponding benefit.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Foreign insolvency proceedings
  • Bankruptcy Trustee
  • Centre of main interest
  • COMI
  • Recognition
  • Liquidation

15.2 Keywords

  • Insolvency
  • Cross-border
  • Singapore
  • Japan
  • Recognition
  • COMI

16. Subjects

  • Insolvency Law
  • Cross-Border Insolvency
  • Company Law

17. Areas of Law

  • Insolvency
  • Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceedings
  • Cross-Border Insolvency