JX Holdings Inc v Singapore Airlines: Universal Succession, Share Transmission & Companies Act

JX Holdings Inc and JX Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation sought rectification of Singapore Airlines Limited's register of members in the High Court of Singapore. The application concerned shares originally purchased by Kyodo Oil Co Ltd, which underwent multiple corporate restructuring exercises under Japanese law. The plaintiffs claimed that JX Holdings Inc was the ultimate successor in title to these shares. The court considered the doctrine of universal succession under private international law and the distinction between a 'transfer' and a 'transmission' of shares under the Companies Act. The court granted the plaintiffs an order in the terms of their amended prayers.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Order granted to the plaintiffs in terms of their amended prayers.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Rectification of Singapore Airlines' register of members was sought due to a complex series of mergers. The court examined universal succession under private international law.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
JX Holdings IncPlaintiffCorporationOrder granted in terms of amended prayersWonJoseph Tay Weiwen, Claire Yeo
JX Nippon Oil & Energy CorporationPlaintiffCorporationOrder granted in terms of amended prayersWonJoseph Tay Weiwen, Claire Yeo
Singapore Airlines LimitedDefendantCorporationOrder granted to PlaintiffLostChan Chee Yin Andrew, Teo Jun Yi, Michelle Lim Wen Yong

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Edmund LeowJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Joseph Tay WeiwenShook Lin & Bok LLP
Claire YeoShook Lin & Bok LLP
Chan Chee Yin AndrewAllen & Gledhill LLP
Teo Jun YiAllen & Gledhill LLP
Michelle Lim Wen YongAllen & Gledhill LLP

4. Facts

  1. Kyodo Oil Co Ltd purchased 20,000 ordinary shares in Singapore Airlines Limited in February 1986.
  2. Kyodo Oil Co Ltd underwent multiple corporate restructuring exercises between December 1992 and July 2010.
  3. Kyodo Oil Co Ltd ceased to exist in 1993, and its rights and obligations passed to Nippon Oil Corporation.
  4. Nippon Oil Corporation underwent an absorption-type split in July 2010, transferring the shares to JX Holdings Inc.
  5. The shares were still registered in Kyodo Oil Co Ltd's name despite the restructuring.
  6. JX Holdings Inc commenced Originating Summons No 303 of 2016 to rectify the register.
  7. Singapore Airlines Limited did not object to the application in principle but disputed which plaintiff owned the shares.

5. Formal Citations

  1. JX Holdings Inc and another v Singapore Airlines Ltd, Originating Summons No 303 of 2016, [2016] SGHC 212

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Kyodo Oil Co Ltd purchased 20,000 ordinary shares in Singapore Airlines Limited
Share issuance in Singapore Airlines Limited
Kyodo Oil Co Ltd underwent multiple corporate restructuring exercises
Capital reduction exercise in Singapore Airlines Limited
Singapore Airport Terminal Services Limited shares issued as dividends in specie on the Singapore Airlines Limited shares
Nippon Oil Corporation underwent an absorption-type split
Expert Opinion of Kotaro Kubo dated
Oral hearing
Input of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore received
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Rectification of Register of Members
    • Outcome: The court granted the order for rectification.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Omission of name from register without sufficient cause
  2. Universal Succession
    • Outcome: The court recognized the succession of corporate personality under Japanese law.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Succession of corporate personality
      • Transfer of assets and liabilities
  3. Transfer vs. Transmission of Shares
    • Outcome: The court held that the transfer of shares took place by way of transmission, not transfer.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Application of s 130(1) of the Companies Act
      • Requirement of proper instrument of transfer

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Amendment of the register of members of Singapore Airlines Limited
  2. Transfer of Singapore Airport Terminal Services Limited shares to the first plaintiff
  3. Payment of all dividends declared in respect of the shares to the first plaintiff

9. Cause of Actions

  • Rectification of register of members under s 194 of the Companies Act

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Aviation
  • Energy

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
W Gregory Dawkins v The Right Hon Baron PenrhynN/AYes[1878] 4 App Cas 51N/ACited for the principle that limitation periods do not operate as a bar unless specifically pleaded as a defence.
Sing Eng (Pte) Ltd v PIC Property LtdCourt of AppealYes[1990] 1 SLR(R) 792SingaporeCited for the interpretation of 'person aggrieved' under s 194(1) of the Companies Act.
Re Asian Organisation LtdN/AYes[1961] MLJ 295N/ACited for the principle that the court has a wide discretion in applications for rectification of the register.
Bellerby v Rowland & Marwood’s Steamship Company LimitedEnglish High CourtYes[1901] 2 Ch 265EnglandCited for the test of whether the plaintiff has shown sufficient 'equity to disturb the existing state of affairs' in rectification applications.
Lazard Brothers and Company v Midland Bank, LimitedN/AYes[1933] AC 289N/ACited for the principle that the law of incorporation governs the dissolution of a corporation.
National Bank of Greece and Athens SA v MetlissHouse of LordsYes[1957] AC 509EnglandCited as the leading case on the doctrine of universal succession.
Adams and others v National Bank of Greece SA and other appealsHouse of LordsYes[1960] AC 255EnglandCited for the principle that courts will scrutinise the juridical nature of the question before it to determine the applicable law in cases of corporate succession.
Natural Section Clothing Ltd v Commissioner of Trade MarksHigh Court of New ZealandYes[1995] 3 NZLR 599New ZealandCited as an example of Metliss being followed in the Commonwealth.
Re Maple Leaf Mills LtdSupreme Court of British ColumbiaYes(1963) 35 DLR (2d) 683CanadaCited as an example of Metliss being followed in the Commonwealth.
Re Sidex Australia Pty Ltd (rec and mgr apptd); Sipad Holding ddpo and another v Popovic and othersFederal Court of AustraliaYes[1995] 18 ASCR 436AustraliaCited for the principle that a change in the ownership of assets pursuant to a process of corporate succession may be effected without the need for an instrument of transfer.
Re KenzlerSupreme Court of QueenslandYes(1983) 7 ACLR 767AustraliaCited for the distinction between a 'transfer' and a 'transmission' of shares.
Seah Teong Kang (co-executor of the will of Lee Koon, deceased) and another v Seah Yong Chwan (executor of the estate of Seah Eng Teow)Court of AppealYes[2015] 5 SLR 792SingaporeCited for the distinction between a 'transfer' and a 'transmission' of shares.
Centro Latino Americano de Commercio Exterior SA v Owners of the Ship “Kommunar” (The “Kommunar” (No 2))English High CourtYes[1997] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 8EnglandCited for clarifying the nature of the doctrine of universal succession.
Astra SA Insurance and Reinsurance Co v Sphere Drake Insurance Ltd and anotherEnglish High CourtYes[2000] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 550EnglandCited for the principle that succession can be found even though the succeeding entity inherits only a part of the patrimony of the original entity.
Eurosteel Ltd v Stinnes AGN/AYes[2000] 1 All ER (Comm) 964N/ACited for the principle that succession can extend to the uninterrupted continuation of pending arbitration proceedings.
Q & M Enterprises Sdn Bhd v Poh KiatN/AYes[2005] 4 SLR(R) 494N/ACited for the principle of international comity.
Beluga Chartering GmbH (in liquidation) and others v Beluga Projects (Singapore) Pte Ltd (in liquidation) and another (deugro (Singapore) Pte Ltd, non-party)N/AYes[2014] 2 SLR 815N/ACited for the principle that matters relating to substantive company law fall to be governed by the law of incorporation.
Focus Energy Ltd v Aye Aye SoeN/AYes[2009] 1 SLR(R) 1086N/ACited for the principle that matters relating to internal management fall to be governed by the law of incorporation.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed) s 194Singapore
Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed) s 130(1)Singapore
Stamp Duties Act (Cap 312, 2006 Rev Ed)Singapore
Companies Ordinance 1940 (Ord No 49 of 1940) s 66Singapore
Companies Act 1929 (c 23) (UK) s 63United Kingdom
Companies (New South Wales) Code (NSW) s 183(2)Australia
Japanese Companies Act Art 2(xxix)Japan
Japanese Companies Act Art 759(1)Japan
Japanese Companies Act Art 923Japan

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Universal succession
  • Absorption-type split
  • Transmission of shares
  • Rectification of register
  • Companies Act
  • Instrument of transfer
  • Corporate restructuring
  • Law of incorporation

15.2 Keywords

  • Companies Act
  • Shares
  • Universal succession
  • Singapore Airlines
  • Rectification
  • Transmission
  • Corporate law
  • Japanese law

16. Subjects

  • Companies
  • Shares
  • Transmission
  • Conflict of Laws
  • Choice of law
  • Corporations

17. Areas of Law

  • Company Law
  • Conflict of Laws
  • Private International Law