Joseph Tay Weiwen

Joseph Tay Weiwen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and minority oppression. Their track record shows a 91.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 9% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated expertise across 62 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Securities	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intention to create legal relations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offer and Acceptance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts for sale and supply of goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
COVID-19 Pandemic	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Tenancy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loans	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best commercial endeavours	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transmission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors and Officers Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Parol Evidence Rule	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reverse Takeovers	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tay Weiwen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joseph Tay Weiwen has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	11 cases	100% of cases	Huber’s Pte Ltd v Hu Lee Impex Pte Ltd: Court-Ordered Easements, Land Titles Act, Property Redevelopment(Sep 2024) H P Construction v Mega Team: Interpretation of SOPA s 13(3)(a) Adjudication Application Deadline(Feb 2024) Soo Hoo Khoon Peng v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2906: Strata Titles, Common Property, and Balcony Screen Installation Dispute(Dec 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joseph Tay Weiwen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (9%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	9%
Won	102.7 parties avg	2.7	91%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joseph Tay Weiwen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(9%)	9%
Won	10(91%)	91%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
MYR	8,000,000.00	8,000,000.001 cases	1
SGD	380,291.50	54,327.367 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2024	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Huber’s Pte Ltd v Hu Lee Impex Pte Ltd: Court-Ordered Easements, Land Titles Act, Property Redevelopment 05 Sep 2024 Huber’s Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	05 Sep 2024	Huber’s Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedApplication for temporary court-ordered easements was allowed. The judgment does not specify a monetary amount for the outcome of Huber's Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	H P Construction v Mega Team: Interpretation of SOPA s 13(3)(a) Adjudication Application Deadline 14 Feb 2024 Mega Team Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	14 Feb 2024	Mega Team Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedSuccessfully defended the appeal; costs awarded at $30,400 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Soo Hoo Khoon Peng v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2906: Strata Titles, Common Property, and Balcony Screen Installation Dispute 18 Dec 2023 Soo Hoo Khoon Peng (Applicant)Lost	18 Dec 2023	Soo Hoo Khoon Peng (Applicant): Application dismissedThe applicant's application for permission to appeal was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	H P Construction v Mega Team: SOPA Adjudication Application Timeline Dispute 22 Oct 2023 Mega Team Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	22 Oct 2023	Mega Team Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; claimant's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed, and the claimant was ordered to pay costs of $13,000 to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Tan Tien Sek v Tan Tien Sai: Oral Contract & Parol Evidence Rule Dispute 30 Mar 2023 Tan Tien Sai (Defendant)Won	30 Mar 2023	Tan Tien Sai (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against the defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Dathena Science v Justco: Frustration & Unfair Contract Terms in Workspace Lease Dispute 27 Sep 2021 Dathena Science Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	27 Sep 2021	Dathena Science Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $286,891.50 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Cheong Chee Hwa v. China Star Food Group: Breach of Contract & Best Endeavours in Reverse Takeover 28 Mar 2019 China Star Food Group Limited (formerly known as Brooke Asia Limited) (Defendant)Won	28 Mar 2019	China Star Food Group Limited (formerly known as Brooke Asia Limited) (Defendant): Action dismissedThe defendant won the case as the plaintiff's action was dismissed.
8	Mann Holdings v Ung Yoke Hong: Debt Recovery & Loan Dispute over Metahub Shares 22 Mar 2018 Chew Ghim Bok (Plaintiff)Won	22 Mar 2018	Chew Ghim Bok (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of RM4 million with interest at 5.33% from the date of the writ of summons (19 June 2015) and costs to be taxed on a standard basis unless otherwise agreed.
9	JX Holdings Inc v Singapore Airlines: Universal Succession, Share Transmission & Companies Act 28 Sep 2016 JX Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation (Plaintiff)Won	28 Sep 2016	JX Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation (Plaintiff): Order granted in terms of amended prayersOrder granted to the plaintiffs in terms of their amended prayers 1–3 and 5–7.
10	Mann Holdings v Ung Yoke Hong: Forum Non Conveniens & Loan Repayment Dispute 07 Jun 2016 Chew Ghim Bok (Plaintiff)Won	07 Jun 2016	Chew Ghim Bok (Plaintiff): Claim for repayment of loan to proceed in SingaporeThe plaintiff's claim for repayment of the loan will be heard in Singapore, as the court dismissed the defendant's application for a stay of proceedings.
11	Peh Yeng Yok v Tembusu Systems: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order in Minority Oppression Suit 14 Mar 2016 Jarrod Luo (Defendant)Won	14 Mar 2016	Jarrod Luo (Defendant): Search order set asideSearch order set aside; costs awarded to Jarrod fixed at $25,000 excluding disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).