Keeping Mark John v Public Prosecutor: Abetment of Cheating by Personation & People Smuggling

In Keeping Mark John v Public Prosecutor, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal against a 12-month imprisonment sentence imposed on Keeping Mark John by the District Court for abetment of cheating by personation under s 419 read with s 109 of the Penal Code. The High Court, on 15 March 2017, found the sentence manifestly excessive, setting a new benchmark sentence of four to six months' imprisonment for such offenses in the context of people smuggling. The court ordered the appellant's release, considering he had already served a nine-month imprisonment term.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Allowed

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The High Court reduced the sentence for abetment of cheating by personation in a people smuggling scheme, setting a new benchmark sentence.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal DismissedLost
Nathaniel Khng of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Keeping Mark JohnAppellantIndividualAppeal AllowedWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chao Hick TinJudge of AppealYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Nathaniel KhngAttorney-General’s Chambers

4. Facts

  1. The Appellant pleaded guilty to abetting cheating by personation under s 419 read with s 109 of the Penal Code.
  2. The Appellant was recruited by a people smuggling syndicate to facilitate illegal entry into another country.
  3. The Appellant's role was to check in for a flight and hand the boarding pass to a Sri Lankan national, Kajanan.
  4. Kajanan used the boarding pass and a forged passport to attempt to board the flight.
  5. The Appellant received US$600 for his role in the scheme.
  6. The Appellant admitted to a similar operation in Tokyo in 2016, for which he was paid US$500.
  7. The District Judge sentenced the Appellant to 12 months' imprisonment.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Keeping Mark John v Public Prosecutor, Magistrate’s Appeal No 9314 of 2016, [2017] SGHC 170
  2. Public Prosecutor v Keeping Mark John, , [2016] SGDC 344

6. Timeline

DateEvent
District Arrest Case No 940920 filed
Magistrate’s Appeal No 9314 filed
Appeal heard
Appellant ordered to be released
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Appropriate benchmark sentence for abetment of cheating by personation in people smuggling cases
    • Outcome: The court determined the benchmark sentence to be four to six months' imprisonment.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2017] SGCA 37
      • [2000] 3 SLR(R) 735
      • Magistrate’s Appeal No 152 of 1995
  2. Relevance of terrorism threat and increased maximum sentence on sentencing for s 419 offences
    • Outcome: The court found the evidence linking people smuggling to terrorism too thin to justify a higher benchmark sentence. The court gave some weight to the increase in the maximum sentence, but moderated it in light of parliamentary speeches.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Relevance of Passport Cases (abetment of breaches of s 47(6) of the Passports Act) to sentencing for s 419 offences
    • Outcome: The court found the Passport Cases not analogous to s 419 offences in terms of policy and punishment, and thus of limited relevance.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [2010] 1 SLR 707

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Abetment of Cheating by Personation

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Appeals

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Ng Kean Meng Terence v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2017] SGCA 37SingaporeCited for the explanation of the difference between the 'starting point' and 'benchmark sentence' approaches to sentencing.
Public Prosecutor v Keeping Mark JohnDistrict CourtYes[2016] SGDC 344SingaporeCited as the grounds of decision of the lower court being appealed.
Chua Bee Lay v Public ProsecutorDistrict CourtYesMagistrate’s Appeal No 152 of 1995SingaporeCited as a sentencing precedent for s 419 offences, but its precedential value was doubted due to it being an unreported case without grounds or explanations.
Public Prosecutor v Ng Tai Tee Janet and anotherHigh CourtYes[2000] 3 SLR(R) 735SingaporeCited as a relevant sentencing precedent for s 419 offences, where the offenders received a one-month imprisonment sentence.
Yong Siew Soon and another v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[1992] 2 SLR(R) 261SingaporeCited as a relevant sentencing precedent for abetment of cheating under s 417 read with s 109 of the Penal Code (Cap 224, 1985 Rev Ed).
Janardana Jayasankarr v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2016] 4 SLR 1288SingaporeCited for the principle that sentencing precedents without grounds or explanations are of little precedential value.
Yap Ah Lai v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2014] 3 SLR 180SingaporeCited for the principle that sentencing precedents without grounds or explanations must be approached with caution.
Luong Thi Trang Hoang Kathleen v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2010] 1 SLR 707SingaporeCited for the principle that care must be taken to ensure that two offences are analogous in terms of both policy and punishment when assessing the value of sentencing precedents based on a different offence.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 419Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 109Singapore
Passports Act (Cap 220, 2008 Rev Ed) s 47(6)Singapore
Passports Act (Cap 220, 2008 Rev Ed) s 47(3)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Abetment of Cheating by Personation
  • People Smuggling
  • Benchmark Sentence
  • Transnational Syndicate
  • False Passport
  • Boarding Pass

15.2 Keywords

  • Abetment
  • Cheating
  • Personation
  • People Smuggling
  • Singapore
  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing Guidelines
  • People Smuggling