Muhammad Sutarno bin Nasir v Public Prosecutor: Aggravated Rape, House-breaking, Drug Possession Sentencing

Muhammad Sutarno bin Nasir appealed against the High Court's sentence for aggravated rape, house-breaking by night with theft, and possession of diamorphine. The Court of Appeal, comprising Sundaresh Menon CJ, Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA, and Quentin Loh J, delivered the judgment on 2018-07-30. The court found the original sentence manifestly excessive, and reduced the aggregate sentence to 19 years’ imprisonment and 18 strokes of the cane.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Allowed in Part

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Ex Tempore Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal against sentence for aggravated rape, house-breaking, and drug possession. The court reduced the aggregate sentence to 19 years' imprisonment and 18 strokes of the cane.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorRespondentGovernment AgencyAppeal Allowed in PartPartial
Charlene Tay Chia of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Nicholas Lai of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Muhammad Sutarno bin NasirAppellantIndividualAppeal Allowed in PartPartial

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Sundaresh MenonChief JusticeYes
Andrew Phang Boon LeongJudge of AppealNo
Quentin LohJudgeNo

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Charlene Tay ChiaAttorney-General’s Chambers
Nicholas LaiAttorney-General’s Chambers

4. Facts

  1. The appellant broke into the victim's home at night.
  2. The appellant punched the victim several times.
  3. The appellant raped the victim.
  4. The appellant stole items from the victim's home.
  5. The appellant possessed diamorphine.
  6. The victim suffered psychological trauma and physical injuries, including lesions suggestive of acute bleeding in the brain.
  7. The victim was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Muhammad Sutarno bin Nasir v Public Prosecutor, Criminal Appeal No 60 of 2017, [2018] SGCA 43

6. Timeline

DateEvent
House-breaking by night with theft at a post office
House-breaking by night at a café
Diamorphine found at café
Aggravated rape and house-breaking
Arrest made
Judgment delivered

7. Legal Issues

  1. Sentencing
    • Outcome: The court reduced the sentence for the rape charge to 14 years and 18 strokes of the cane and the sentence for the possession charge back to the statutorily-prescribed minimum of two years’ imprisonment.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Totality principle
      • Rule against double counting
    • Related Cases:
      • [2017] 2 SLR 449
      • [2017] 2 SLR 68
      • [2018] SGHC 148
      • [2014] 2 SLR 998

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Appeal against sentence

9. Cause of Actions

  • Aggravated Rape
  • House-breaking by night with theft
  • Possession of Diamorphine

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Appeals

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Ng Kean Meng Terence v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2017] 2 SLR 449SingaporeLaid down the sentencing framework for rape offences.
Public Prosecutor v Ravindran AnnamalaiHigh CourtNo[2013] SGHC 77SingaporeCited as an example of a case within the middle to upper reaches of Band 2 for rape sentencing.
Public Prosecutor v BNNHigh CourtNo[2014] SGHC 7SingaporeCited as an example of a case within the middle to upper reaches of Band 2 for rape sentencing.
Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Fadzli bin Abdul RahimHigh CourtNo[2008] SGHC 177SingaporeCited as an example of a case within the middle to upper reaches of Band 2 for rape sentencing.
Chang Kar Meng v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2017] 2 SLR 68SingaporeCited for the principle that offenders who plead guilty to sexual offences should be given some credit.
Public Prosecutor v Raveen BalakrishnanHigh CourtYes[2018] SGHC 148SingaporeCited for the principle that a factor fully taken into account at one stage in the sentencing analysis should not feature at another stage and for the aggregation principle.
Mohamed Shouffee bin Adam v PPCourt of AppealYes[2014] 2 SLR 998SingaporeCited for the principle that distinct offences should be punished separately with consecutive sentences.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 375(3)(a)(i)Singapore
Penal Code s 457Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) s 8(a)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) s 33(1)Singapore
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68, 2012 Rev Ed) s 307(1)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Aggravated rape
  • House-breaking
  • Diamorphine
  • Sentencing
  • Totality principle
  • Consecutive sentences
  • Concurrent sentences
  • Mitigating factors
  • Aggravating factors

15.2 Keywords

  • aggravated rape
  • house-breaking
  • drug possession
  • sentencing
  • criminal appeal

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing