DHJS Hull v Skaugen Marine: Winding Up Dismissal Due to Disputed Debt & Improper Pressure

In DHJS Hull No 2007-002 LLC v Skaugen Marine Investments Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore dismissed winding up proceedings commenced by DHJS Hull No 2007-002 LLC against Skaugen Marine Investments Pte Ltd due to a disputed debt and the improper use of proceedings to pressure the defendant. The court also dismissed the plaintiff's application to be substituted by a supporting creditor, DHJS Hull No. 2007-001 LLC. Costs were awarded to the defendant. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck J on 21 May 2018.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Companies Winding Up No 7 of 2018 is dismissed; the plaintiff’s application to be substituted by a supporting creditor is dismissed; and costs to the defendant are fixed at $18,000 plus reasonable disbursements.

1.3 Case Type

Insolvency

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Winding up proceedings dismissed as the debt was disputed and the proceedings were used to improperly pressure the defendant. The court also dismissed the plaintiff's application for substitution.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
DHJS Hull No 2007-002 LLCPlaintiffCorporationWinding up dismissed, Application to be substituted by a supporting creditor is dismissedDismissed, DismissedLin Weiwen Moses, Seet An Xiang Justin
Skaugen Marine Investments Pte LtdDefendantCorporationWinding up dismissedWonDaryll Ng, Lauren Tang Hui Jing, Ong Huijun Christine

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Lin Weiwen MosesIncisive Law LLC
Seet An Xiang JustinIncisive Law LLC
Daryll NgVirtus Law LLP
Lauren Tang Hui JingVirtus Law LLP
Ong Huijun ChristineVirtus Law LLP

4. Facts

  1. The defendant chartered a vessel from the plaintiff on 28 July 2008 but did not pay after receiving invoices for the charter.
  2. The plaintiff issued a statutory demand and a notice of arbitration on 20 December 2017.
  3. The defendant's solicitors stated on 10 January 2018 that the debt was disputed.
  4. The plaintiff commenced winding up proceedings on 15 January 2018.
  5. The defendant alleges a common understanding that hire would not be paid in accordance with invoices.
  6. The defendant claims to have counterclaims against the plaintiff.
  7. The supporting creditor had obtained a partial final arbitral award in its favour.

5. Formal Citations

  1. DHJS Hull No 2007-002 LLC v Skaugen Marine Investments Pte Ltd, Companies Winding-Up No 7 of 2018 and HC/Summons No 1931 of 2018, [2018] SGHC 122

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Defendant chartered a vessel from the plaintiff
Plaintiff issued a statutory demand and a notice of arbitration
Defendant's solicitors stated the debt was disputed
Plaintiff commenced winding up proceedings
Defendant applied for proceedings to be abridged
Hearing for winding up application and application to be substituted by a supporting creditor
Last day of payment for supporting creditor's statutory demand
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Whether the debt is disputed
    • Outcome: The court found that the debt was disputed on substantial grounds.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Abuse of process
    • Outcome: The court found that the winding up proceedings were being used for the collateral purpose of exerting improper pressure on the defendant.
    • Category: Procedural
  3. Application for substitution of creditor
    • Outcome: The court declined to exercise its discretion to substitute the supporting creditor for the plaintiff.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Winding up of the company

9. Cause of Actions

  • Failure to pay charter hire

10. Practice Areas

  • Winding Up
  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Shipping

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Companies Act (Cap 50)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Winding up
  • Statutory demand
  • Disputed debt
  • Arbitration
  • Substitution of creditor
  • Abuse of process
  • Charter party
  • Counterclaims

15.2 Keywords

  • Winding up
  • Singapore
  • Disputed debt
  • Arbitration
  • Shipping

16. Subjects

  • Insolvency
  • Winding Up
  • Company Law
  • Arbitration

17. Areas of Law

  • Insolvency Law
  • Company Law
  • Civil Procedure