Shipping Disputes
Shipping Disputes is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 16 cases from 2000 to 2024.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Shipping Disputes, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Oon & Bazul LLP25.00% success rate | 4 cases25.0% of area |
AsiaLegal LLC33.33% success rate | 3 cases18.8% of area |
Rajah & Tann33.33% success rate | 3 cases18.8% of area |
Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate | 2 cases12.5% of area |
Ang & Partners100.00% success rate | 2 cases12.5% of area |
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP50.00% success rate | 2 cases12.5% of area |
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP50.00% success rate | 2 cases12.5% of area |
CLASIS LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases6.3% of area |
Robert Wang & Woo LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases6.3% of area |
Niru & Co LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases6.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Shipping Disputes, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Song Swee Lian Corina0.00% success rate | 2 cases12.5% of area |
Govindarajalu Asokan0.00% success rate | 2 cases12.5% of area |
Bazul Ashhab bin Abdul Kader50.00% success rate | 2 cases12.5% of area |
Liew Teck Huat100.00% success rate | 1 cases6.3% of area |
Kok Jia An Alwyn100.00% success rate | 1 cases6.3% of area |
Tan Thye Hoe Timothy0.00% success rate | 1 cases6.3% of area |
Dawn Tan Si Jie100.00% success rate | 1 cases6.3% of area |
Kenneth Tan100.00% success rate | 1 cases6.3% of area |
Seow Hwang Seng John100.00% success rate | 1 cases6.3% of area |
Toh Kian Sing SC100.00% success rate | 1 cases6.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 16 most recent judgments out of 16 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Da Hui Shipping v An Rong Shipping: Permission to Appeal under Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act | Appellate Division of the High Court | 18 Feb 2024 | PTA Application dismissed. |
2 | Sai Wan Shipping v Landmark Line: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice | General Division of the High Court | 13 Jan 2022 | Order granted setting aside the entire second award, pursuant to s 24(b) of the IAA and Art 34(2)(a)(ii) of the Model Law. |
3 | Banque Cantonale v Jeil Crystal: Admiralty Claim Amendment & Warrant of Arrest | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 29 Dec 2021 | Warrant of Arrest upheld on the basis of the amended claim. |
4 | Batavia EXIMP v Owner of New Breeze: Stay of Proceedings & Time Bar Defence in Arbitration | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 26 Oct 2021 | Appeal dismissed |
5 | Natixis v Owner of MIRACLE HOPE: Setting Aside Arrest Warrant for Material Non-Disclosure | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 26 May 2020 | Application to set aside the warrant of arrest is dismissed. |
6 | DP Shipbuilding v Owner of LONG BRIGHT: Judicial Sale of Vessel & Plaintiff's Right to Release | High Court of Singapore | 02 Oct 2018 | Order for appraisement and sale discharged, and release of the vessel allowed. |
7 | DHJS Hull v Skaugen Marine: Winding Up Dismissal Due to Disputed Debt & Improper Pressure | High Court of Singapore | 20 May 2018 | Companies Winding Up No 7 of 2018 is dismissed; the plaintiff’s application to be substituted by a supporting creditor is dismissed; and costs to the defendant are fixed at $18,000 plus reasonable disbursements. |
8 | Janata Flour v Dream Star: Collision at Sea, COLREGS, & Negligence | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 11 Sep 2017 | Interlocutory judgment for the defendant with damages to be assessed and apportioned 70:30 in favour of the defendant. |
9 | Consorcio MGT v Owner of MIN RUI: Admiralty Claim for Damaged Steel Structures | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 01 Sep 2016 | Appeal Allowed |
10 | S E Shipping Lines v Austral Asia Line: Winding-Up Application Dispute | High Court | 29 Oct 2012 | Application dismissed. |
11 | SK Shipping v IOF: Rules of Court O 24 r 11 Application for Document Production | High Court | 24 Sep 2012 | The court ordered the plaintiff to file and serve a list of documents and an affidavit verifying the same, stating whether it has or has had at any time in its possession, custody or power documents in categories 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of Annex A. No order is made for the documents in categories 8, 14, 15 and 16. |
12 | Union Bank of Taiwan v Sin Chuen No 112: Master's Wage Claim Dismissed for Fraudulent Contracts | High Court | 08 Apr 2007 | The Bank's application to strike out the Master's Statement of Claim was allowed. |
13 | Credit Agricole v Far East Shipping: Admissibility of Further Affidavit in Appeal | High Court | 17 Oct 2006 | Application to admit further affidavit dismissed. |
14 | Pacific Inter-Link Sdn Bhd v OAS Asia Star: Voyage Charterparty Dispute over Unfit Cargo Tanks | High Court | 28 Jun 2006 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
15 | Marubeni v Projector SA: Interim Mandatory Injunction & Letters of Indemnity Dispute | High Court | 15 Aug 2004 | Interim mandatory injunction discharged; decision on costs and inquiry as to damages reserved to the trial judge. |
16 | Zarkovic Stanko v Owners of the Ship MARA: Admiralty Jurisdiction, Personal Injury, and Contractual Compensation | Court of Appeal | 31 Aug 2000 | Appeal allowed. |